This is a review of the learning points from the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review,1 chaired by Baroness Julia Cumberlege CBE DL. This system-wide review was initiated by the then Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, following patient-led campaigns. It looked at how the “healthcare system reacted as a whole, and how that response can be made more robust, speedy and appropriate”.

We aim to highlight the learning points for doctors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology as these are relevant to our current practice and future changes in our healthcare system. These are:

Aims of the review: why it was initiated and how it was conducted

Overarching themes and missed opportunities to prevent avoidable harm

Three clinical scenarios: their histories, issues and adverse events associated with their use and the current response in Scotland

The hormone pregnancy test - Primodos

The anti-epileptic drug - sodium valproate

Surgical mesh for prolapse & incontinence

The recommendations made by the review and implementation guidance

Responses to the review, such as apologies issued by BSUG2/BAUS3/RCOG,4 and compensations schemes such as the Scottish scheme as recommended by the review

1. Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review. First Do No Harm- The report of the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.immdsreview.org.uk/downloads/IMMDSReview_Web.pdf(accessed 16 July 2020).
Google Scholar2. British Society of Urogynaecology . BSUG apology in response to the Report of Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Feb 11]. Available from: https://bsug.org.uk/news-details/bsug-apology-in-response-to-the-report-of-independent-medicines-and-medical-devices-safety-review-/95/0/0
Google Scholar3. British Association of Urological Surgeons . Statement to BAUS members following publication of the Cumberlege Report [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.baus.org.uk/patients/sui_mesh_complications.aspx
Google Scholar4. Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists . President's response to the Independent Medicines and Medical Devices Safety Review [Internet]. [cited 2020 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/en/guidelines-research-services/patient-safety/mesh/
Google Scholar5. Levitt, R, Wall, A, Appleby, J. The reorganized national health service. 6th ed. United Kingdom: Stanley Thornes (Publishers) Ltd, 1995.
Google Scholar6. WHO . The World Health Organisation [Internet]. [cited 2020 Dec 17]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety
Google Scholar7. The Independent Medicines & Medical Devices Safety Review [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 Aug 18]. Available from: https://www.immdsreview.org.uk
Google Scholar8. Olszynko-Gryn, J, Bjørvik, E, Weßel, M A historical argument for regulatory failure in the case of primodos and other hormone pregnancy tests. Reprod Biomed Soc Online 2018; 6: 34–44.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Heneghan, C, Aronson, J, Spencer, Eet al. Oral hormone pregnancy tests and the risks of congenital malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Res 2018 Oct 31; 7: 1725.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Higgins, G, Sadler, W. A two-tablet oral pregnancy test Practitioner 1960; 185: 677–680.
Google Scholar | Medline11. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency . Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Annual Report and Accounts 2015/16 [Internet]. Williams Lea Group on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office; 2016 [cited 2020 Dec 27]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/539865/MHRA_annual_report_and_accounts_2015_to_2016_print.pdf
Google Scholar12. Commission on Human Medicines . Report of the Commission on Human Medicines’ Expert Working Group on Hormone Pregnancy Tests [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 Dec 27]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/report-of-the-commission-on-human-medicines-expert-working-group-on-hormone-pregnancy-tests
Google Scholar13. Britton, H . Pregnancy test Br Med J 1956; 2: 419.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Minshull, J . Prescribing of valproate in line with the valproate pregnancy prevention program (PREVENT) policy [internet]. Specialist Pharmacy Service. 2019 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://www.sps.nhs.uk/articles/prescribing-of-valproate-in-the-line-with-valproate-pregnancy-prevention-program-prevent-policy/
Google Scholar15. MICHAEL MANSFIELD QC representing INFACT [Internet]. INFACT National Valproate Campaign. 2018 [cited 2020 Dec 29]. Available from: https://infactuk.com/2018/03/05/michael-mansfield-qc-representing-infact/
Google Scholar16. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Valproate use by women and girls [Internet]. GOV.UK. 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 21]. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/valproate-use-by-women-and-girls
Google Scholar17. Shakespeare, J, Sisodiya, S. Guidance Document on Valproate Use in Women and Girls of Childbearing Years [Internet]. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; 2019 [cited 2021 Feb 25]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/valproate-guidance-march-2019.pdf
Google Scholar18. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency . Annual Risk Acknowledgement Form [Internet]. GOV.UK. 2021 [cited 2021 Feb 21]. Available from: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5cac898eed915d5d7318b646/Risk-acknowledgment.pdf
Google Scholar19. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse in women: management. Evidence reviews for surgical and physical management of stress urinary incontinence [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 24]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng123/evidence/evidence-review-e-surgical-and-physical-management-of-stress-urinary-incontinence-pdf-6725287410
Google Scholar | Crossref20. Campbell, P, Jha, S, Cutner, A. Vaginal mesh in prolapse surgery. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist 2018; 20: 49–56.
Google Scholar | Crossref21. The British Society of Urogynaecology . Non-Mesh Continence Surgery Mentorship Scheme [Internet]. Available from: https://bsug.org.uk/pages/information/nonmesh-continence-surgery-mentorship-scheme/123
Google Scholar22. British Society of Urogynaecology . Useful Documents [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 11]. Available from: https://bsug.org.uk/pages/useful-documents/143
Google Scholar23. British Society of Urogynaecology . England Mesh Complication Centres Announced [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 17]. Available from: https://bsug.org.uk/pages/information-for-patients/111
Google Scholar24. British Society of Urogynaecology . Mesh Information Leaflets [Internet]. [cited 2021 Jun 17]. Available from: https://bsug.org.uk/pages/for-patients/mesh-information-leaflets/156
Google Scholar25. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Treating complications from mesh used for stress urinary incontinence. Options for women referred to specialist centres. Patient decision aid [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Jun 18]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng123/resources/treating-complications-from-mesh-used-for-stress-urinary-incontinence-options-for-women-referred-to-specialist-centres-patient-decision-aid-pdf-6725286117
Google Scholar26. NHS National Services Scotland . Scottish Government Mesh Fund [Internet]. [cited 2021 Feb 11]. Available from: https://nhsnss.org/services/practitioner/medical/scottish-government-mesh-fund/
Google Scholar27. Christie, B Scotland to create patient champion role. BMJ [Internet]. 2020;370. Available from: https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3469
Google Scholar28. NHS Digital . Surgical Devices and Implants Pilot Data Collection [Internet]. 2020. Available from: https://digital.nhs.uk/about-nhs-digital/corporate-information-and-documents/directions-and-data-provision-notices/data-provision-notices-dpns/surgical-devices-and-implants
Google Scholar