Vaknin Z, Lahat Y, Barel O, Ben-Ami I, Reish O, Herman A, Maymon R. Termination of pregnancy due to fetal abnormalities performed after 23 weeks’ gestation: analysis of indications in 144 cases from a single medical center. Fetal Diagn Ther. 2009;25(2):291–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000229501 (Epub 2009 Jul 24 PMID: 19628945).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aslan H, Yildirim G, Ongut C, Ceylan Y. Termination of pregnancy for fetal anomaly. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007;99(3):221–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.047 (Epub 2007 Sep 24 PMID: 17889880).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Adamsbaum C, Moutard ML, André C, Merzoug V, Ferey S, Quéré MP, Lewin F, Fallet-Bianco C. MRI of the fetal posterior fossa. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35(2):124–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-004-1316-3 (Epub 2004 Nov 23 PMID: 15565345).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Limperopoulos C, du Plessis AJ. Disorders of cerebellar growth and development. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2006;18:621–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Garel C. New advances in fetal MR neuroimaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2006;36(7):621–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0200-8 (Epub 2006 May 3 PMID: 16770666).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Limperopoulos C, Robertson RL Jr, Khwaja OS, Robson CD, Estroff JA, Barnewolt C, Levine D, Morash D, Nemes L, Zaccagnini L, du Plessis AJ. How accurately does current fetal imaging identify posterior fossa anomalies? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190(6):1637–43. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3036.PMID:18492918;PMCID:PMC2692250.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Van Doorn M, Oude Rengerink K, Newsum EA, Reneman L, Majoie CB, Pajkrt E. Added value of fetal MRI in fetuses with suspected brain abnormalities on neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(18):2949–61. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1109621 (Epub 2015 Nov 23 PMID: 26592136).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rossi AC, Prefumo F. Additional value of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the prenatal diagnosis of central nervous system anomalies: a systematic review of the literature. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44(4):388–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13429 (Epub 2014 Aug 21 PMID: 24890732).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Batty R, Gawne-Cain ML, Mooney C, Mandefield L, Bradburn M, Mason G, Griffiths PD. Analysis of errors made on in utero MR studies of the foetal brain in the MERIDIAN study. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(1):195–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5508-x (Epub 2018 Jun 15. PMID: 29948083; PMCID: PMC6291426).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Coady AM, Bower S. Fetal Pathology. In Twining’s Textbook of Fetal Abnormalities (3rd edn). Churchil Livingstone: London, 2014.

Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Pauliah SS, Jacques TS, Chong WK, Gunny R, Saunders D, Addison S, Lally P, Cady E, Jones R, Norman W, Scott R, Robertson NJ, Wade A, Chitty L, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ. Magnetic resonance imaging autopsy study (MaRIAS) collaborative group. diagnostic accuracy and limitations of post-mortem MRI for neurological abnormalities in fetuses and children. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(8):872–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.008 (Epub 2015 Jun 6. PMID: 26050535).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shojania KG, Burton EC. The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(9):873–5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0707996 (PMID: 18305264).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cronin RS, Li M, Wise M, Bradford B, Culling V, Zuccollo J, Thompson JMD, Mitchell EA, McCowan LME. Late stillbirth post mortem examination in New Zealand: Maternal decision-making. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(6):667–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12790 (Epub 2018 Mar 5 PMID: 29505671).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Chong W, Olsen O, Gunny RS, Offiah AC, Owens CM, Saunders DE, Scott RJ, Jones R, Norman W, Addison S, Bainbridge A, Cady EB, Vita ED, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM; MARIAS collaborative group. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet. 2013 20;382(9888):223–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60134-8. Epub 2013 May 16. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013 Dec 14;382(9909):1980. Erratum in: Lancet. 2013;382(9888):208. PMID: 23683720.

Shelmerdine SC, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ. Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem ultrasound vs postmortem 1.5-T MRI for non-invasive perinatal autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;57(3):449–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22012 (PMID: 32149428).

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hutchinson JC, Kang X, Shelmerdine SC, Segers V, Lombardi CM, Cannie MM, Sebire NJ, Jani JC, Arthurs OJ. Postmortem microfocus computed tomography for early gestation fetuses: a validation study against conventional autopsy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(4):445.e1-445.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.01.040 (Epub 2018 Feb 2 PMID: 29410108).

Article  Google Scholar 

Kang X, Cannie MM, Arthurs OJ, Segers V, Fourneau C, Bevilacqua E, Cos Sanchez T, Sebire NJ, Jani JC. Post-mortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging of human fetuses: a comparison of 3-T vs. 1.5-T MR imaging with classical autopsy. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3542–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-016-4725-4 (Epub 2017 Jan 23. PMID: 28116518).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kang X, Carlin A, Cannie MM, Sanchez TC, Jani JC. Fetal postmortem imaging: an overview of current techniques and future perspectives. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020;223(4):493–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2020.04.034 (Epub 2020 May 4 PMID: 32376319).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shruthi M, Gupta N, Jana M, Mridha AR, Kumar A, Agarwal R, Sharma R, Deka D, Gupta AK, Kabra M. Conventional vs virtual autopsy with postmortem MRI in phenotypic characterization of stillbirths and fetal malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(2):236–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.17468 (PMID: 28295775).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ashwin C, Hutchinson JC, Kang X, Langan D, Jones R, Norman W, Cannie M, Jani J, Sebire NJ, Arthurs OJ. Learning effect on perinatal post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging reporting: single reporter diagnostic accuracy of 200 cases. Prenat Diagn. 2017;37(6):566–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5043 (Epub 2017 May 23 PMID: 28342279).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kang X, Sanchez TC, Arthurs OJ, Bevilacqua E, Cannie MM, Segers V, Lecomte S, Sebire NJ, Jani JC. Postmortem fetal imaging: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional ultrasound with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;54(6):791–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20217 (PMID: 30644623).

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shelmerdine SC, Arthurs OJ, Gilpin I, Norman W, Jones R, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS. Is traditional perinatal autopsy needed after detailed fetal ultrasound and post-mortem MRI? Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(9):818–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5448 (Epub 2019 Apr 15 PMID: 30892705).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arthurs OJ, Barber JL, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ. Normal perinatal and paediatric postmortem magnetic resonance imaging appearances. Pediatr Radiol. 2015;45(4):527–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3166-y (Epub 2015 Apr 1. PMID: 25828356; PMCID: PMC4381098).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Genest DR, Williams MA, Greene MF. Estimating the time of death in stillborn fetuses: I. Histologic evaluation of fetal organs; an autopsy study of 150 stillborns. Obstet Gynecol. 1992;80(4):575–84 (PMID: 1383898).

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

In Kline-Fath, B. M., In Bahado-Singh, R., & In Bulas, D. I. (2015). Fundamental and advanced fetal imaging: Ultrasound and MRI.

Izzo G, Talenti G, Falanga G, Moscatelli M, Conte G, Scola E, Doneda C, Parazzini C, Rustico M, Triulzi F, Righini A. Intrauterine fetal MR versus postmortem MR imaging after therapeutic termination of pregnancy: evaluation of the concordance in the detection of brain abnormalities at early gestational stage. Eur Radiol. 2019;29(6):2740–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5878-0 (Epub 2018 Dec 12 PMID: 30542750).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goergen SK, Alibrahim E, Govender N, Stanislavsky A, Abel C, Prystupa S, Collett J, Shelmerdine SC, Arthurs OJ. Diagnostic assessment of foetal brain malformations with intra-uterine MRI versus perinatal post-mortem MRI. Neuroradiology. 2019;61(8):921–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02218-9 (Epub 2019 May 10. PMID: 31076826; PMCID: PMC6620257).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Offiah CE, Dean J. Post-mortem CT and MRI: appropriate post-mortem imaging appearances and changes related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1058):20150851. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20150851 (Epub 2015 Nov 12. PMID: 26562099; PMCID: PMC4985223).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Victoria T, Capilla E, Chauvin NA, Johnson AM, Kramer SS, Epelman M. MR evaluation of fetal demise. Pediatr Radiol. 2011;41(7):884–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-1995-5 (Epub 2011 Mar 8 PMID: 21384261).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Montaldo P, Addison S, Oliveira V, Lally PJ, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ, Thayyil S, Arthurs OJ. Quantification of maceration changes using post mortem MRI in fetuses. BMC Med Imaging. 2016;27(16):34. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-016-0137-9.PMID:27121379;PMCID:PMC4849089.

Article  Google Scholar