1. Rayes, H. A., Tani, C., Kwan, A., et al. What is the prevalence of cognitive impairment in lupus and which instruments are used to measure it? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2018; 48(2): 240–255.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Yuen, K, Bingham, K, Tayer-Shifman, OE, et al. Measures of Cognition in Rheumatic Diseases. Arthritis Care research 2020; 72 (Suppl 10): 660–675.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. The American College of Rheumatology nomenclature and case definitions for neuropsychiatric lupus syndromes. Arthritis rheumatism. 1999;42(4):599–608.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Kozora, E., Ellison, M. C., West, S. Reliability and validity of the proposed American College of Rheumatology neuropsychological battery for systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 51(5): 810–818.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Kane, RL, Roebuck-Spencer, T, Short, P, et al. Identifying and monitoring cognitive deficits in clinical populations using Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) tests. Arch clinical neuropsychology : the official journal Natl Acad Neuropsychologists 2007; 22(Suppl 1): S115–26.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Hanly, J. G., Omisade, A., Su, L., et al. Assessment of cognitive function in systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and multiple sclerosis by computerized neuropsychological tests. Arthritis Rheum 2010; 62(5): 1478–1486.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Xie, S. S., Goldstein, C. M., Gathright, E. C., et al. Performance of the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) in detecting cognitive impairment in heart failure patients. Heart & Lung 2015; 44(5): 387–394.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. CRSC. ANAM . Technical Manual. Norman, OK: Cognitive Science Research Center, University of Oklahoma, 2013.
Google Scholar9. Tayer-Shifman, EO, Green, R, Beaton, D, et al. Validity Evidence Supports the Use of Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2019.
Google Scholar10. Morgan, J. Classification and Regression Tree Analysis. Boston University, 2014.
Google Scholar11. Breiman, L, Friedman, J, Stone, C, et al. Classification and Regression Trees. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1984, p. 368.
Google Scholar12. Lewis, RJ . An Introduction to Classification and Regression Tree (CART) Analysis. San Francisco, CA: Annual Meeting of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine, 2000, p. 14.
Google Scholar13. Kaul, A., Gordon, C., Crow, M. K., et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016; 2: 16039.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., et al. Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised: Normative Data and Analysis of Inter-Form and Test-Retest Reliability. The Clin neuropsychologist 1998; 12(1): 43–55.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI15. Shapiro, A. M., Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., et al. Construct and Concurrent Validity of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised. The Clin Neuropsychologist 1999; 13(3): 348–358.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Thorne, RD . Throughput: a simple performance index with desirable characteristics. Behav research Methods 2006; 38(4): 569–573.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI17. R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austira: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2013. http://www.R-project.org/
Google Scholar18. Atkinson, EJ, Therneau, TM. An Introduction to recursive partitioning using the RPART routines. Technical report 61. Rochester, MN: Mayo Clinic, Section of Statistics, 2000.
Google Scholar19. Kuhn, M, Wing, J, Weston, S, et al. Package 'caret' Classification and Regression Training, 6, pp. 0–86 ed2020.
Google Scholar20. Hanley, J. A., McNeil, B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143(1): 29–36.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. Sing, T, Sander, O, Beerenwinkel, N, et al. ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 2005; 21(20): 3940, 1.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI22. Robin, X., Turck, N., Hainard, A., et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12: 77.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI23. Milborrow, S . Package 'rpart.plot' rpart.plot: Plot 'rpart' Models: An Enhanced Version of 'plot, 3. rpart. DOI: 0.8 ed2019.
Google Scholar24. Williams, GJ . Data Mining with Rattle and R: The art of excavating data for knowledge discovery. New York, NY: Springer, 2011.
Google Scholar | Crossref25. Harvey, PD . Domains of cognition and their assessment. Dialogues clinical neuroscience 2019; 21(3): 227–237.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Diamond, A. Executive functions. Annu Rev Psychol 2013; 64: 135–168.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI27. Wilken, J. A., Kane, R., Sullivan, C. L., et al. The utility of computerized neuropsychological assessment of cognitive dysfunction in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J 2003; 9(2): 119–127.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI28. Short, P, Cernich, A, Wilken, JA, et al. Initial construct validation of frequently employed ANAM measures through structural equation modeling. Arch clinical neuropsychology : the official journal Natl Acad Neuropsychologists 2007; 22 (Suppl 1): S63–S77.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Kabat, M. H., Kane, R. L., Jefferson, A. L., et al. Construct validity of selected Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM) battery measures. Clin neuropsychologist 2001; 15(4): 498–507.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI30. Roebuck-Spencer, T. M., Yarboro, C., Nowak, M., et al. Use of computerized assessment to predict neuropsychological functioning and emotional distress in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum 2006; 55(3): 434–441.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline31. Touma, Z, Beaton, B, Tartaglia, C, et al. Can the automated neuropsychological assessment metrics (ANAM) predict cognitive impairment compared to a comprehensive neuropsychological battery in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)? Ann Rheum Dis 2018; 77: 1069.
Google Scholar32. Holliday, S. L., Navarrete, M. G., Hermosillo-Romo, D., et al. Validating a computerized neuropsychological test battery for mixed ethnic lupus patients. Lupus 2003; 12(9): 697–703.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI33. Brunner, H. I., Klein-Gitelman, M. S., Zelko, F., et al. Validation of the Pediatric Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res 2013; 65(3): 372–381.
Google Scholar | Crossref34. Vincent, A. S., Roebuck-Spencer, T. M., Fuenzalida, E., et al. Test-retest reliability and practice effects for the ANAM General Neuropsychological Screening battery. Clin neuropsychologist 2018; 32(3): 479–494.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Vincent, A. S., Roebuck-Spencer, T., Gilliland, K., et al. Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (v4) Traumatic Brain Injury Battery: military normative data. Mil medicine 2012; 177(3): 256–269.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Proctor, S. P., Nieto, K., Heaton, K. J., et al. Neurocognitive performance and prior injury among U.S. Department of Defense Military Personnel. Mil medicine 2015; 180: 660–669.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. Hanly, J. G., Kozora, E., Beyea, S. D., et al. Nervous System Disease in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Current Status and Future Directions. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019; 71(1): 33–42.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Ainiala, H., Loukkola, J., Peltola, J., et al. The prevalence of neuropsychiatric syndromes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Neurology 2001; 57(3): 496, 500.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI