1. Asimov, I . ‘Runaround’. I, Robot. New York City: Doubleday, 1950.
Google Scholar2. Selz, D . From electronic markets to data driven insights. Electron Mark 2020; 30: 57–59.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. Moor, J . The dartmouth college artificial intelligence conference: the next fifty years. AI Mag 2006; 27: 87–91.
Google Scholar4. Duan, Y, Edwards, JS, Dwivedi, YK. Artificial intelligence for decision making in the era of Big Data – evolution, challenges and research agenda. Int J Inf Manage 2019; 48: 63–71.
Google Scholar | Crossref5. Rai, A, Constantinides, P, Sarker, S. Next-generation digital platforms: toward human-AI hybrids. MIS Q 2019; 43: iii–ix.
Google Scholar6. Li, H, Wang, X, Liu, C, et al. Dual-input neural network integrating feature extraction and deep learning for coronary artery disease detection using electrocardiogram and phonocardiogram. IEEE Access 2019; 7: 146457–146469.
Google Scholar | Crossref7. López-Martínez, F, Núñez-Valdez, ER, Lorduy Gomez, J, et al. A neural network approach to predict early neonatal sepsis. Comput Electr Eng 2019; 76: 379–388.
Google Scholar | Crossref8. De Ramón Fernández, A, Ruiz Fernández, D, Prieto Sánchez, MT. A decision support system for predicting the treatment of ectopic pregnancies. Int J Med Inform 2019; 129: 198–204.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Denecke, K, Lutz Hochreutener, S, Pöpel, A, et al. Talking to Ana: a mobile self-anamnesis application with conversational user interface. In: International Conference on Digital Health, Lyon, France, 2018. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1145/3194658.3194670.
Google Scholar | Crossref10. Dellermann, D, Lipusch, N, Ebel, P, et al. Design principles for a hybrid intelligence decision support system for business model validation. Electron Mark 2018; 29: 423–441.
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Nasirian, F, Ahmadian, M, Lee, O-K. AI-based voice assistant systems: evaluating from the interaction and trust perspectives. In: Twenty-third Americas Conference on Information Systems, Boston, MA, USA, 2017.
Google Scholar12. Guha, S, Kumar, S. Emergence of big data research in operations management, information systems, and healthcare: past contributions and future roadmap. Prod Oper Manag 2018; 27: 1724–1735.
Google Scholar | Crossref13. Sonja, M, Ioana, G, Miaoqing, Y, et al. Understanding value in health data ecosystems: a review of current evidence and ways forward. Rand Heal Q; 7.
Google Scholar14. Salerno, J, Knoppers, BM, Lee, LM, et al. Ethics, big data and computing in epidemiology and public health. Ann Epidemiol 2017; 27: 297–301.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Libaque-Sáenz, CF, Wong, SF, Chang, Y, et al. The effect of fair information practices and data collection methods on privacy-related behaviors: a study of mobile apps. Inf Manag 2021; 58(1): 103284. DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2020.103284.
Google Scholar | Crossref16. EU . Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI, https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai (2020).
Google Scholar17. Dawson, D, Schleiger, E, Horton, J, et al. Artificial Intelligence: Australia’s Ethics Framework. Data61 CSIRO, Australia.
Google Scholar18. O’Sullivan, S, Nevejans, N, Allen, C, et al. Legal, regulatory, and ethical frameworks for development of standards in artificial intelligence (AI) and autonomous robotic surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2019; 15: e1968.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Schneeberger, D, Stöger, K, Holzinger, A. The European legal framework for medical AI. In: Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, pp. 209–226.
Google Scholar | Crossref20. Ploug, T, Holm, S. The right to refuse diagnostics and treatment planning by artificial intelligence. Med Heal Care Philos 2020; 23: 107–114.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Turel, O, Matt, C, Trenz, M, et al. Panel report: the dark side of the digitization of the individual. Internet Res 2019; 29: 274–288.
Google Scholar | Crossref22. Luxton, DD . Artificial intelligence in psychological practice: current and future applications and implications. Prof Psychol Res Pract 2014; 45: 332–339.
Google Scholar | Crossref23. Mirbabaie, M, Stieglitz, S, Frick, NRJ. Artificial intelligence in disease diagnostics: a critical review and classification on the current state of research guiding future direction. Health Technol (Berl) 2021; 11: 693–731.
Google Scholar | Crossref24. Mirbabaie, M, Hofeditz, L, Frick, NRJ, et al. Artificial intelligence in hospitals: providing a status quo of ethical considerations in academia to guide future research. AI Soc 2021 Epub ahead of print 28 June 2021. DOI: 10.1007/s00146-021-01239-4.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Page, K . The four principles: can they be measured and do they predict ethical decision making? BMC Med Ethics 2012; 13: 10. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-13-10.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline26. Price, J, Price, D, Williams, G, et al. Changes in medical student attitudes as they progress through a medical course. J Med Ethics 1998; 24: 110–117.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Bore, M, Munro, D, Kerridge, I, et al. Selection of medical students according to their moral orientation. Med Educ 2005; 39: 266–275.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI28. Rezler, AG, Schwartz, RL, Obenshain, SS, et al. Assessment of ethical decisions and values. Med Educ 1992; 26: 7–16.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Rezler, AG, Lambert, P, Obenshain, SS, et al. Professional decisions and ethical values in medical and law students. Acad Med 1990; 65: 31–32.
Google Scholar | Crossref30. Hebert, PC, Meslin, EM, Dunn, EV. Measuring the ethical sensitivity of medical students: a study at the University of Toronto. J Med Ethics 1992; 18: 142–147.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Milosevic, Z . Ethics in digital health: a deontic accountability framework. In: 2019 IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC), Paris, France. IEEE, pp. 105–111.
Google Scholar | Crossref32. Knijnenburg, B, Willemsen, M. Inferring capabilities of intelligent agents from their external traits. ACM Trans Interact Intell Syst 2016; 6: 1–25.
Google Scholar | Crossref33. Martinez-Martin, N, Kreitmair, K. ethical issues for direct-to-consumer digital psychotherapy apps: addressing accountability, data protection, and consent. JMIR Ment Heal 2018; 5: e32. DOI: 10.2196/mental.9423.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline34. Knight, W . The dark secret at the heart of AI. MIT Technol Rev, 2017.
Google Scholar35. Park, SH, Kim, Y-H, Lee, JY, et al. Ethical challenges regarding artificial intelligence in medicine from the perspective of scientific editing and peer review. Sci Ed 2019; 6: 91–98.
Google Scholar | Crossref36. Reddy, S, Allan, S, Coghlan, S, et al. A governance model for the application of AI in health care. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020; 27: 491–497.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. Recht, MP, Dewey, M, Dreyer, K, et al. Integrating artificial intelligence into the clinical practice of radiology: challenges and recommendations. Eur Radiol 2020; 30: 3576–3584.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline38. Luxton, DD . Ethical implications of conversational agents in global public health. Bull World Health Organ 2020; 98: 285–287.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. WHO . Big data and artificial intelligence, https://www.who.int/ethics/topics/big-data-artificial-intelligence/en/ (2020, accessed 19 September 2020).
Google Scholar40. Wiens, J, Saria, S, Sendak, M, et al. Do no harm: a roadmap for responsible machine learning for health care. Nat Med 2019; 25: 1337–1340.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline41. Floridi, L, Cowls, J, Beltrametti, M, et al. AI4People—An ethical framework for a good ai society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds Mach 2018; 28: 689–707.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline42. Benevolent . Principles developed in conjunction with the 2017 Asilomar conference, https://futureoflife.org/ai-principles (2017, accessed 19 September 2020).
Google Scholar43. de Montréal, U . The montreal declaration for the responsible development of artificial intelligence, https://www.montrealdeclaration-responsibleai.com/ (2020, accessed 19 September 2020).
Google Scholar44. UK Parliament . AI in the UK: ready, willing and able? Select Committee on Artificial Intelligence. Report of Session 2017 -19. 16 April 2018. Authority of the House of Lords.
Google Scholar45. Beauchamp, TL, Childress, JF. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
Google Scholar46. Lawrence, DJ . The Four principles of biomedical ethics: a foundation for current bioethical debate. J Chiropr Humanit 2007; 14: 34–40.
Google Scholar | Crossref47. Webster, J, Watson, R. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q 2002; 26: 13–23.
Google Scholar | ISI48. Bear, A, Knobe, J. Normality: part descriptive, part prescriptive. Cognition 2016; 167: 25–37.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline49. Bem, DJ . Writing a review article for Psychological Bulletin. Psychol Bull 1995; 118: 172–177.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI50. vom Brocke, J, Simons, A, Riemer, K, et al. Standing on the shoulders of giants: challenges and recommendations of literature search in information systems research. Commun Assoc Inf Syst 2015; 37: 205‐224. DOI: 10.17705/1CAIS.03709.
Google Scholar | Crossref51. vom Brocke, J, Simons, A, Niehaves, et al. Reconstructing the giant: on the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In: European Conference on Information Systems, Verona, Italy, . DOI: 10.1108/09600031211269721.
Google Scholar | Crossref52. Cooper, HM . Organizing knowledge syntheses: a taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowl Soc 1988; 1: 104–126.
Google Scholar53. Boell, SK, Blair, W. www.litbaskets.ioan IT artifact supporting exploratory literature searches. In: Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Perth, Western Australia, Australia, 2019.
Google Scholar54. Jones, TM . Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: an issue-contingent model. Acad Manag Rev 1991; 16: 366–395.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI55. Alami, H, Lehoux, P, Auclair, Y, et al. Artificial intelligence and health technology assessment: anticipating a new level of complexity. J Med Internet Res 2021; 22: e17707. DOI: 10.2196/17707.
Google Scholar | Crossref56. Alexiou, A, Psixa, M, Vlamos, P. Artificial intelligence applications and innovations. In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Neos Marmaras, Greece. Springer, 2011, pp. 297–302.
Google Scholar57. Alexiou, A, Theocharopoulou, G, Vlamos, P. Ethical issues in neuroinformatics. In: IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Paphos, Cyprus, 2013, pp. 700–705.
Google Scholar | Crossref58. Avila-Tomas, JF, Olano-Espinosa, E, Minué-Lorenzo, C, et al. Effectiveness of a chat-bot for the adult population to quit smoking: protocol of a pragmatic clinical trial in primary care ([email protected]). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2019; 19: 249. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-019-0972-z.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline59. Bærøe, K, Miyata-Sturm, A, Henden, E. How to achieve trustworthy artificial intelligence for health. Bull World Health Organ 2020; 98: 257–262.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline60. Bauer, M, Glenn, T, Monteith, S, et al. Ethical perspectives on recommending digital technology for patients with mental illness. Int J Bipolar Disord 2017; 5: 6.