Complications Associated With Totally Implanted Venous Access Devices in the Arm Versus the Chest: A Short-Term Retrospective Study

1. Li, G, Zhang, Y, Ma, H, Zheng, J. Arm port vs chest port: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:6099–6112. doi:10.2147/CMAR.S205988
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Akahane, A, Sone, M, Ehara, S, Kato, K, Tanaka, R, Nakasato, T. Subclavian vein versus arm vein for totally implantable central venous port for patients with head and neck cancer: a retrospective comparative analysis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2011;34(6):1222–1229. doi:10.1007/s00270-010-0051-4
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Burbridge, B . Pictorial essay: arm implantation of the cook vital-port mini titanium. Vasc Access. 2013;7:11–16. doi:10.1016%2Fj.carj.2015.11.007
Google Scholar4. Goltz, JP, Noack, C, Petritsch, B, Kirchner, J, Hahn, D, Kickuth, R. Totally implantable venous power ports of the forearm and the chest: initial clinical experience with port devices approved for high-pressure injections. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1019):e966–e972. doi:10.1259/bjr/33224341
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Weickhardt, A . Comparison of radiologically inserted arm ports versus surgically implanted chest ports for chemotherapy. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2009;5:181. doi:10.1111/j.1743-7563.2009.01231
Google Scholar | Crossref6. Kuriakose, P, Colon-Otero, G, Paz-Fumagalli, R. Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13(2 pt 1):179–184. doi:10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61936-8
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Shiono, M, Takahashi, S, Kakudo, Y, et al. Upper arm central venous port implantation: a 6-year single institutional retrospective analysis and pictorial essay of procedures for insertion. PLoS One. 2014;9(3):e91335. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0091335
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Liu, Y, Li, LL, Xu, L, et al. Comparison between arm port and chest port for optimal vascular access port in patients with breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2020;2020:9082924. Published 2020 Feb 13. doi:10.1155/2020/9082924
Google Scholar | Medline9. Marcy, PY . A comparison between distal and proximal port device insertion in head and neck cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2008;34(11):1262–1269. doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2007.09.011
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Burbridge, B, Stoneham, G, Lim, H, Chel-Hee, L. Radiology-implanted arm ports: a review of the literature. JAVA. 2015;20(2):81–90. doi:10.1016/j.java.2015.02.002
Google Scholar | Crossref11. Tabatabaie, O, Kasumova, GG, Kent, TS, et al. Upper extremity deep venous thrombosis after port insertion: what are the risk factors? Surgery. 2017;162(2):437–444. doi:10.1016/j.surg.2017.02.020
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline12. Burbridge, B, Goyal, K. Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD. J Vasc Access. 2016;17(6):527–534. doi:10.5301/jva.5000609
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals

Comments (0)

No login
gif