1. Hershcovis, MS . “Incivility, social undermining, bullying oh my!”: A call to reconcile constructs within workplace aggression research. J Organ Behav 2011; 32(3): 499–519.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI2. Rhoades, L, Eisenberger, R. Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. J Applied Psychol 2002; 87(4): 698.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI3. Rodwell, J, Brunetto, Y, Demir, D, et al. Abusive supervision and links to nurse intentions to quit. J Nurs Scholarship 2014; 46(5): 357–365.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Whitman, MV, Halbesleben, JR, Shanine, KK. Psychological entitlement and abusive supervision: political skill as a self-regulatory mechanism. Health Care Manag Rev. 2013; 38(3): 248–257.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Greenbaum, RL, Mawritz, MB, Piccolo, RF. When leaders fail to “walk the talk” supervisor undermining and perceptions of leader hypocrisy. J Manag 2015; 41(3): 929–956.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI6. Kislik, L . What to do if your boss doesn’t like someone you manage. Harv Business Rev 2018. Available at https://hbr.org/2018/03/what-to-do-if-your-boss-doesnt-like-someone-you-manage
Google Scholar7. Duffy, MK, Ganster, DC, Pagon, M. Social undermining in the workplace. Acad Manag J 2002; 45(2): 331–351.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI8. Lee, K, Kim, E, Bhave, DP, et al. Why victims of undermining at work become perpetrators of undermining: an integrative model. J Appl Psychol 2016; 101(6): 915.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Rosenstein, AH, O’Daniel, M. A survey of the impact of disruptive behaviors and communication defects on patient safety. The Joint Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2008; 34(8): 464–471.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Berry, PA, Gillespie, GL, Gates, D, et al. Novice nurse productivity following workplace bullying. J Nursing Scholarship 2012; 44(1): 80–87.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. US Bureau of Labor Statistics . Occupational therapists. 2021. Available at https://www.bls.gov/ooh/healthcare/occupational-therapists.htm
Google Scholar12. Rogers, AT, Bai, G, Lavin, RA, et al. Higher hospital spending on occupational therapy is associated with lower readmission rates. Med Care Res Rev 2017; 74(6): 668–686.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI13. OT Potential . Occupational Therapy Burnout – What it is and how to fix it. 2019. Available at https://otpotential.com/blog/occupational-therapy-burnout
Google Scholar14. Lin, V, Zhang, X, Dixon, P. Occupational therapy workforce in the United States: forecasting nationwide shortages. PM&R 2015; 7(9): 946–954.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Aiken, LH, Clarke, SP, Sloane, DM, et al. Hospital nurse staffing and patient mortality, nurse burnout, and job dissatisfaction. Jama 2002; 288(16): 1987–1993.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI16. Schaufeli, WB, Taris, TW. A critical review of the job demands-resources model: implications for improving work and health. In: Bauer, GF, Hämmig, O (eds) Bridging Occupational, Organizational Public Health. Germany: Springer Science + Business Media, 2014, pp. 43–68.
Google Scholar | Crossref17. Demerouti, E, Bakker, AB, Nachreiner, F, et al. The job demands-resources model of burnout. J Appl Psychol 2001; 86(3): 499.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI18. Tomo, A, De Simone, S. Using the job demands-resources approach to assess employee well-being in healthcare. Health Services Manag Res 2019; 32(2): 58–68.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI19. Tomo, A, De Simone, S. The moderating role of job resources in the relationship between ageing, professional status and well-being in healthcare. J Econ Administrative Sci 2021 Apr 12. DOI: 10.1108/JEAS-10-2020-0177
Google Scholar | Crossref20. Bakker, AB, Hakanen, JJ, Demerouti, E, et al. Job resources boost work engagement, particularly when job demands are high. J Educ Psychol 2007; 99(2): 274.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI21. Livne, Y, Goussinsky, R. Workplace bullying and burnout among healthcare employees: the moderating effect of control‐related resources. Nurs Health Sciences 2018; 20(1): 89–98.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Zito, M, Cortese, CG, Colombo, L. Nurses’ exhaustion: the role of flow at work between job demands and job resources. J Nursing Manag 2016; 24(1): E12–E22.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Macey, WH, Schneider, B. The meaning of employee engagement. Ind Organ Psychol 2008; 1(1): 3.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI24. Demerouti, E, Bakker, AB. The oldenburg burnout inventory: a good alternative to measure burnout and engagement. In: Handbook of stress and burnout in health care. Hauppauge, NY, USA: Nova Science Publishers. 2008, pp. 65–78.
Google Scholar25. Data USA . Occupational Therapists. 2019. Available at https://datausa.io/profile/soc/occupational-therapists#about.
Google Scholar26. Matthews, RA, Ritter, KJ. A concise, content valid, gender invariant measure of workplace incivility. J Occup Health Psychol 2016; 21(3): 352–365.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. Grant, AM . Employees without a cause: The motivational effects of prosocial impact in public service. Int Public Manag J 2008; 11(1): 48–66.
Google Scholar | Crossref28. Rousseau, V, Aubé, C. Social support at work and affective commitment to the organization: the moderating effect of job resource adequacy and ambient conditions. The J Social Psychol 2010; 150(4): 321–340.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Pejtersen, JH, Kristensen, TS, Borg, V, et al. The second version of the copenhagen psychosocial questionnaire. Scand Journal Public Health 2010; 38(3_suppl): 8–24.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI30. Matthews, RA, Kath, LM, Barnes-Farrell, JL. A short, valid, predictive measure of work–family conflict: item selection and scale validation. J Occupational Health Psychol 2010; 15(1): 75.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Tremblay, MA, Blanchard, CM, Taylor, S, et al. Work extrinsic and intrinsic motivation scale: its value for organizational psychology research. Can J Behav Sci/Revue canadienne des Sci du comportement 2009; 41(4): 213.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI32. Estabrooks, CA, Squires, JE, Cummings, GG, et al. Development and assessment of the Alberta context tool. BMC Health Serv Res 2009; 9(1): 1–2.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline33. Schaufeli, WB, Bakker, AB, Salanova, M. The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: a cross-national study. Educ Psychol Measur 2006; 66(4): 701–716.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI34. Hu, LT, Bentler, PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model: A Multidiscip J 1999; 6(1): 1–55.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI35. Kline, RB . Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY, USA: thE GuiLFord PrESS, 2006.
Google Scholar36. Sonnentag, S, Grant, AM. Doing good at work feels good at home, but not right away: when and why perceived prosocial impact predicts positive affect. Personnel Psychol 2012; 65(3): 495–530.
Google Scholar | Crossref37. Grant, AM, Campbell, EM. Doing good, doing harm, being well and burning out: the interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. J Occup Organ Psychol 2007; 80(4): 665–691.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI38. Rowe, MM, Sherlock, H. Stress and verbal abuse in nursing: do burned out nurses eat their young? J Nurs Manag 2005; 13: 242–248.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline39. Halbesleben, JR, Whitman, MV. Evaluating survey quality in health services research: a decision framework for assessing nonresponse bias. Health Serv Res 2013; 48(3): 913–930.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI40. Spector, PE . Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Res Methods 2006; 9: 221–232.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI