1. Arbit E, Pannullo S. Lumbar stenosis: a clinical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001 (384): 137–43.

2. Ciol MA, Deyo RA, Howell E, Kreif S. An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996 44:285–90.

3. Porter RW. Spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 21:2046–52.

4. Katz JN, Dalgas M, Stucki G, et al. Degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: diagnostic value of the history and physical examination. Arthritis Rheum 1995 38:1236–41.

5. Deyo RA, Battie M, Beurskens AJ, et al. Outcome measures for low back pain research: a proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1998 23:2003–13.

6. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, Deyo R. Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: attempted meta-analysis of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1992 17:1–8.

7. Siebert E, Pruss H, Klingebiel R, Failli V, Einhaupl KM, Schwab JM. Lumbar spinal stenosis: syndrome, diagnostics and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol 2009 5:392–403.

8. Stucki G, Liang MH, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Relative responsiveness of condition-specific and generic health status measures in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995 48:1369–78.

9. Fokter SK, Yerby SA. Patient-based outcomes for the operative treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur Spine J 2006 15:1661–9.

10. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA, et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial evaluating the X STOP interspinous process decompression system for the treatment of neurogenic intermittent claudication: two-year follow-up results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005 30:1351–8.

11. Stucki G, Daltroy L, Liang MH, Lipson SJ, Fossel AH, Katz JN. Measurement properties of a self-administered outcome measure in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 21:796–803.

12. Pratt RK, Fairbank JC, Virr A. The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002 27:84–91.

13. Tuli SK, Yerby SA, Katz JN. Methodological approaches to developing criteria for improvement in lumbar spinal stenosis surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006 31:1276–80.

14. Tomkins CC, Battie MC, Hu R. Construct validity of the physical function scale of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire for the measurement of walking capacity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007 32:1896–901.

15. North American Spine Society. Evidence-based clinical guidelines for multidisciplinary spine care: diagnosis and treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Burr Ridge (IL): North American Spine Society; 2007. 16. Comer CM, Conaghan PG, Tennant A. Internal construct validity of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis questionnaire: Rasch analysis of a disease-specific outcome measure for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011 36:1969–76.

17. Kopec JA, Esdaile JM, Abrahamowicz M, et al. The Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: measurement properties. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1995 20:341–52.

18. Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The Pain Disability Index: psychometric properties. Pain 1990 40:171–82.

19. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980 66:271–3.

20. Katz JN, Lipson SJ, Chang LC, Levine SA, Fossel AH, Liang MH. Seven- to 10-year outcome of decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996 21:92–8.

21. Gunzburg R, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Vandeputte K, Spratt KF. Clinical and psychofunctional measures of conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective cohort study. Eur Spine J 2003 12:197–204.

22. Herno A, Airaksinen O, Saari T, Pitkanen M, Manninen H, Suomalainen O. Computed tomography findings 4 years after surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis: no correlation with clinical outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 24:2234–9.

23. Page SJ, Shawaryn MA, Cernich AN, Linacre JM. Scaling of the revised Oswestry low back pain questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002 83:1579–84.

24. Davidson M. Rasch analysis of three versions of the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Man Ther 2008 13:222–31.

25. Hupli M, Sainio P, Hurri H, Alaranta H. Comparison of trunk strength measurements between two different isokinetic devices used at clinical settings. J Spinal Disord 1997 10:391–7.

26. Boden SD. Outcome assessment after spinal fusion: why and how? Orthop Clin North Am 1998 29:717–28.

27. Liebenson C. Rehabilitation of the spine: a practitioner’s manual. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1996. 28. Baker D, Pynsent P, Fairbank J,The Oswestry Disability Index revisited. Roland M, Jenner JR, editors. Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1989. p.174–86. 29. Comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management of low back pain: a feasibility study: report of a working group. J Epidemiol Community Health 1986 40:12–7.

30. Meade TW, Dyer S, Browne W, Frank AO. Randomised comparison of chiropractic and hospital outpatient management for low back pain: results from extended follow up. BMJ 1995 311:349–51.

31. Pynsent PB, Fairbank JC, Carr AJ. Outcome measures in orthopaedics. Oxford:: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1993. 32. Hudson-Cook N, Tomes-Nicholson K, Breen A,A revised Oswestry disability questionnaire. Roland M, Jenner JR, editors. Back pain: new approaches to rehabilitation and education. Manchester: Manchester University Press; 1989. p.187–204. 33. Coleman RE, Houston S, Purohit OP, Rubens RD, Kandra A, Ford J. A randomised phase II study of oral pamidronate for the treatment of bone metastases from breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1998 34:820–4.

34. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Ylikoski M, Hurri H, Osterman K. Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Reduction or fusion in situ. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1993 18:894–901.

35. Purohit OP, Anthony C, Radstone CR, Owen J, Coleman RE. High-dose intravenous pamidronate for metastatic bone pain. Br J Cancer 1994 70:554–8.

36. Tyrrell CT, Bruning PF, May-Levin F, et al. Pamidronate infusions as single-agent therapy for bone metastases: a phase II trial in patients with breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 1995 31A:1976–80.

37. Manniche C, Asmussen K, Lauritsen B, Vinterberg H, Kreiner S, Jordan A. Low Back Pain Rating scale: validation of a tool for assessment of low back pain. Pain 1994 57:317–26.

38. Dropsy R, Marty M. Quality-of-life indexes for assessment of low-back-pain. Rev Rhum 1994 61:S44–8. 39. Muller-Busch HC, Hoffmann P. Active music therapy for chronic pain: a prospective study. Schmerz 1997 11:91–100.

40. Boscainos P, Sapkas G, Stilianesi E, et al. Clinical relevance of specific parameters isolated within the Oswestry and Roland-Morris functional disability scales. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999 81-B:239. 41. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Lopez-Abente G, Pozo F. Neuro-reflexotherapy intervention in the treatment of non specified low back pain: a randomized, controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Med Clin (Barc) 1993 101:570–5.

42. Skargren EI, Oberg BE, Carlsson PG, Gade M. Cost and effectiveness analysis of chiropractic and physiotherapy treatment for low back and neck pain: six-month follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1997 22:2167–77.

43. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2000 25:2940–52.

44. Herno A, Saari T, Suomalainen O, Airaksinen O. The degree of decompressive relief and its relation to clinical outcome in patients undergoing surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1999 24:1010–4.

45. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992 30:473–83.

46. Haley SM, McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr. Evaluation of the MOS SF-36 physical functioning scale (PF-10): I. unidimensionality and reproducibility of the Rasch item scale. J Clin Epidemiol 1994 47:671–84.

47. Stucki G, Daltroy L, Katz JN, Johannesson M, Liang MH. Interpretation of change scores in ordinal clinical scales and health status measures: the whole may not equal the sum of the parts. J Clin Epidemiol 1996 49:711–7.

48. Taylor WJ, McPherson KM. Using Rasch analysis to compare the psychometric properties of the Short Form 36 physical function score and the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index in patients with psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2007 57:723–9.

49. Tomkins CC, Battie MC, Rogers T, Jiang H, Petersen S. A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009 34:2444–9.

50. Conway J, Tomkins CC, Haig AJ. Walking assessment in people with lumbar spinal stenosis: capacity, performance, and self-report measures. Spine J 2011 11:816–23.

51. Keell SD, Chambers JS, Francis DP, Edwards DF, Stables RH. Shuttle-walk test to assess chronic heart failure. Lancet 1998 352:705.

52. Payne GE, Skehan JD. Shuttle walking test: a new approach for evaluating patients with pacemakers. Heart 1996 75:414–8.

53. Singh SJ, Morgan MD, Scott S, Walters D, Hardman AE. Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax 1992 47:1019–24.

54. Reips UD, Funke F. Interval-level measurement with visual analogue scales in Internet-based research: VAS Generator. Behav Res Methods 2008 40:699–704.

55. Adamchic I, Langguth B, Hauptmann C, Tass PA. Psychometric evaluation of visual analog scale for the assessment of chronic tinnitus. Am J Audiol 2012 21:215–25.

56. Grant S, Aitchison T, Henderson E, et al. A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise. Chest 1999 116:1208–17.

57. Bourdel N, Alves J, Pickering G, Ramilo I, Roman H, Canis M. Systematic review of endometriosis pain assessment: how to choose a scale? Hum Reprod Update 2015 21:136–52.

58. Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring system for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1976 50:18–9. 59. Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Scoring system for cervical myelopathy. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 1994 68:490–503. 60. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the Japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001 26:1890–4.

61. Chen FF. What happens if we compare chopsticks with forks?: the impact of making inappropriate comparisons in cross-cultural research. J Pers Soc Psychol 2008 95:1005–18.

62. Roh YH, Yang BK, Noh JH, Baek GH, Song CH, Gong HS. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Korean version of the Michigan hand questionnaire. J Hand Surg Am 2011 36:1497–503.

63. Benzel EC, Lancon J, Kesterson L, Hadden T. Cervical laminectomy and dentate ligament section for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Spinal Disord 1991 4:286–95.

64. Chiles BW 3rd, Leonard MA, Choudhri HF, Cooper PR. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: patterns of neurological deficit and recovery after anterior cervical decompression. Neurosurgery 1999 44:762–9.

65. Keller A, von Ammon K, Klaiber R, Waespe W. Spondylogenic cervical myelopathy: conservative and surgical therapy. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1993 123:1682–91.

66. Bartels RH, Verbeek AL, Benzel EC, Fehlings MG, Guiot BH. Validation of a translated version of the modified Japanese orthopaedic association score to assess outcomes in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: an approach to globalize outcomes assessment tools. Neurosurgery 2010 66:1013–6.

67. Kato S, Oshima Y, Oka H, et al. Comparison of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and modified JOA (mJOA) score for the assessment of cervical myelopathy: a multicenter observational study. PLoS One 2015 10:e0123022.

68. EuroQol Group. EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 1990 16:199–208.

69. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. population-based EQ-5D index score. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2005 [cited 2017 May 10]. Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/rice/EQ5Dscore.htm. 70. Mueller B, Carreon LY, Glassman SD. Comparison of the EuroQOL-5D with the Oswestry Disability Index, back and leg pain scores in patients with degenerative lumbar spine pathology. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013 38:757–61.

71. Makan P, Fairbank J, Wanders L. Clinical assessment of lumbar spinal stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1998 30(2S): 158.