Safety assessment and results of coronary spasm provocation testing in patients with myocardial infarction with unobstructed coronary arteries compared to patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries

1. Agewall, S, Beltrame, JF, Reynolds, HR, et al. ESC Working Group position paper on myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Eur Heart J 2017; 38: 143–153.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI2. Bainey, KR, Welsh, RC, Alemayehu, W, et al. Population-level incidence and outcomes of myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): Insights from the Alberta Contemporary Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients Invasive Treatment Strategies (COAPT) study. Int J Cardiol 2018; 264: 12–17.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Dreyer, RP, Tavella, R, Curtis, JP, et al. Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: Outcomes in a Medicare population. Eur Heart J 2020; 41: 870–878.
Google Scholar | Medline4. Tamis-Holland, JE, Jneid, H, Reynolds, HR, et al. Contemporary diagnosis and management of patients with myocardial infarction in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2019; 139: e891–e908.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Ong, P, Athanasiadis, A, Hill, S, et al. Coronary artery spasm as a frequent cause of acute coronary syndrome: The CASPAR (Coronary Artery Spasm in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008; 52: 523–527.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Montone, RA, Niccoli, G, Fracassi, F, et al. Patients with acute myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries: Safety and prognostic relevance of invasive coronary provocative tests. Eur Heart J 2018; 39: 91–98.
Google Scholar | Medline7. Pirozzolo, G, Seitz, A, Athanasiadis, A, et al. Microvascular spasm in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction without culprit lesion (MINOCA). Clin Res Cardiol 2020; 109: 246–254.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Ong, P, Athanasiadis, A, Borgulya, G, et al. High prevalence of a pathological response to acetylcholine testing in patients with stable angina pectoris and unobstructed coronary arteries. The ACOVA study (Abnormal COronary VAsomotion in patients with stable angina and unobstructed coronary arteries). J Am Coll Cardiol 2012; 59: 655–662.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. Ong, P, Athanasiadis, A, Borgulya, G, et al. Clinical usefulness, angiographic characteristics, and safety evaluation of intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing among 921 consecutive white patients with unobstructed coronary arteries. Circulation 2014; 129: 1723–1730.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI10. Austen, WG, Edwards, JE, Frye, RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51: 5–40.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline11. Sun, H, Mohri, M, Shimokawa, H, et al. Coronary microvascular spasm causes myocardial ischemia in patients with vasospastic angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 39: 847–851.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Ong, P, Athanasiadis, A, Mahrholdt, H, et al. Transient myocardial ischemia during acetylcholine-induced coronary microvascular dysfunction documented by myocardial contrast echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 2013; 6: 153–155.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. Gue, YX, Corballis, N, Ryding, A, et al. MINOCA presenting with STEMI: Incidence, aetiology and outcome in a contemporaneous cohort. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2019; 48: 533–538.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Aziz, A, Hansen, HS, Sechtem, U, et al. Sex-related differences in vasomotor function in patients with angina and unobstructed coronary arteries. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017; 70: 2349–2358.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline15. Montone, RA, Niccoli, G, Russo, M, et al. Clinical, angiographic and echocardiographic correlates of epicardial and microvascular spasm in patients with myocardial ischaemia and non-obstructive coronary arteries. Clin Res Cardiol 2020; 109: 435–443.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Wei, J, Mehta, PK, Johnson, BD, et al. Safety of coronary reactivity testing in women with no obstructive coronary artery disease: Results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women’s Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 646–653.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline17. Ciliberti, G, Seshasai, SRK, Ambrosio, G, et al. Safety of intracoronary provocative testing for the diagnosis of coronary artery spasm. Int J Cardiol 2017; 244: 77–83.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline18. Isogai, T, Yasunaga, H, Matsui, H, et al. Serious cardiac complications in coronary spasm provocation tests using acetylcholine or ergonovine: Analysis of 21 512 patients from the diagnosis procedure combination database in Japan. Clin Cardiol 2015; 38: 171–177.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Ong, P, Athanasiadis, A, Sechtem, U. Intracoronary acetylcholine provocation testing for assessment of coronary vasomotor disorders. J Vis Exp 2016.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Yilmaz, A, Mahrholdt, H, Athanasiadis, A, et al. Coronary vasospasm as the underlying cause for chest pain in patients with PVB19 myocarditis. Heart 2008; 94: 1456–1463.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline

Comments (0)

No login
gif