Cross-cultural differences in user-centred research: An international living lab survey

1. European Union . The silver economy - the final report. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, 2018. Luxembourg.
Google Scholar2. Ballon, P, Van Hoed, M, Schuurman, D. The effectiveness of involving users in digital innovation: measuring the impact of living labs. Telematics Inform 2018; 35: 1201–1214.
Google Scholar | Crossref3. Mulder, I, Stappers, PJ., Co-creating, in Practice: Results and Challenges. In: Proceedings of the 15th international conference of concurrent enterprising: ICE 2009, Leiden, The Netherlands. , pp. 1–8. Nottingham, UK: Centre for Concurrent Enterprise.
Google Scholar4. Santoso, HB, Schrepp, M. The impact of culture and product on the subjective importance of user experience aspects. Heliyon 2019; 5(9): e02434.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline5. Im, EO, Page, R, Lin, LC, et al. Rigor in cross-cultural nursing research. Int J Nurs Stud 2004; 41: 891–899.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI6. Masuda, T, Ito, K, Lee, J, et al. Culture and business: how Can cultural psychologists contribute to research on behaviors in the marketplace and workplace? Front Psychol 2020; 11: 1304–1320.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Beller, J, Heesen, M, Vollrath, M. Improving the driver-automation interaction: an approach using automation uncertainty. Hum Factors 2013; 55: 1130–1141.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI8. Giebels, E, Oostinga, MS, Taylor, PJ, et al. The cultural dimension of uncertainty avoidance impacts police-civilian interaction. Law Hum Behav 2017; 41: 93–102.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline9. Hwang, Y. Investigating enterprise systems adoption: uncertainty avoidance, intrinsic motivation, and the technology acceptance model. Eur J Inform Syst 2005; 14: 150–161.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI10. Choi, B, Lee, I, Kim, J. Culturability in mobile data services: a qualitative study of the relationship between cultural characteristics and user-experience attributes. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2006; 20(3): 171–203.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI11. Im, I, Kim, Y, Han, HJ. The effects of perceived risk and technology type on users’ acceptance of technologies. Inf Manage 2008; 45(1): 1–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref12. Rodger, JA, Pendharkar, PC. A field study of the impact of gender and User’s technical experience on the performance of voice-activated medical tracking application. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2004; 60(5-6): 529–544.
Google Scholar | Crossref13. Brajnik, G, Giachin, C. Using sketches and storyboards to assess impact of age difference in user experience. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2014; 72(6): 552–566.
Google Scholar | Crossref14. Magsamen-Conrad, K, Upadhyaya, S, Joa, CY, et al. Bridging the divide: using UTAUT to predict multigenerational tablet adoption practices. Comput Human Behav 2015; 50: 186–196.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI15. Greenwood, N, Ellmers, T, Holley, J. The influence of ethnic group composition on focus group discussions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2014; 14(1): 107–113.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline16. Liamputtong, P. Focus group methodology: principle and practice. London: SAGE Publications, 2011.
Google Scholar | Crossref17. Xie, B, Druin, A, Fails, J, et al. Connecting generations: developing co-design methods for older adults and children. Behav Inf Technol 2012; 31(4): 413–423.
Google Scholar | Crossref18. Halcomb, EJ, Gholizadeh, L, DiGiacomo, M, et al. Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups. J Clin Nurs 2007; 16(6): 1000–1011.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI19. Carrera, JS, Brown, P, Brody, JG, et al. Research altruism as motivation for participation in community-centered environmental health research. Soc Sci Med 2017; 196: 175–181.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Grant, RW, Sugarman, J. Ethics in human subjects research: do incentives matter? J Med Philos 2004; 29(6): 717–738.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI21. Berge, LIO, Juniwaty, KS, Sekei, LH. Gender composition and group dynamics: evidence from a laboratory experiment with microfinance clients. J Econ Behav Organ 2016; 131: 1–20.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Scholl, A, Sassenberg, K, Ellemers, N, et al. Highly identified power-holders feel responsible: the interplay between social identification and social power within groups. Br J Soc Psychol 2018; 57: 112–129.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Krogstad, DJ, Diop, S, Diallo, A, et al. Informed consent in international research: the rationale for different approaches. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2010; 83(4): 743–747.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI24. Huer, MB, Saenz, TI. Challenges and strategies for conducting survey and focus group research with culturally diverse groups. Am J Speech-Language Pathol 2003; 12: 209–220.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

Comments (0)

No login
gif