Drs. Kazmers, Tashjian, and Jurynec were equal contributors in the development of the technique. The use of laboratory animals was approved by the University of Utah’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC; Protocol number 18-09005). We apply Nair (Church and Dwight Co., Ewing, NJ) to the ventral aspect of the mouse shoulder and wipe the hair from the surgical site. The skin is rinsed well with warm water to remove any residual Nair. Next, the animals are placed in a closed chamber and anesthetized with isoflurane gas (California Pet Pharmacy [Hayward, CA], 4%-5% for induction and 2.5% for maintenance) mixed with oxygen. We place ophthalmic ointment (California Pet Pharmacy) on the animals’ eyes to prevent corneal drying and trauma. The animals are positioned supine on an infrared heating pad (37°C; Kent Scientific, Torrington, CT) with the snout placed within flexible tubing, through which anesthetic is administered throughout the procedure (RWD Life Science, Shenzhen, China).
We place 2 pairs of 18-gauge needles (Becton, Dickinson, and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ) adjacent to the bilateral axillae and chest wall to position the forelimb in abduction and to prevent movement of the mouse during the procedure. Next, the skin is prepared with betadine swabs 3 times followed by alcohol swabs (Medline, Northfield, IL) 3 times. The animal is draped with Press’n Seal (Glad, Oakland, CA), and a small window is made to access the surgical site. All scalpel blades and other surgical instruments are from Fine Science Tools, Vancouver Canada.
Surgery is performed under 3.5× loupe magnification. A 2-cm incision is made from the mid-clavicle to the deltoid tuberosity (Fig 1). Subcutaneous flaps are mobilized. The forelimb is next brought into extension, adduction, and external rotation (Fig 2), delivering the shoulder into the wound and placing the deltoid on tension.Fig 1Positioning the mouse for rotator cuff repair surgery. Mice were anesthetized and positioned supine. The forelimbs were positioned in abduction using an 18-gauge needle (A). A-2 cm ventral incision was made to access to the rotator cuff (B).
Fig 2Positioning the shoulder for access to the proximal humerus. The forelimb is extended, adducted, and externally rotated, while a probe is used to leverage the joint. The forelimb is also pulled down and externally rotated to dislocate the shoulder joint. (A). A #11-blade scalpel is used to elevate the deltoid (B).
The surgery is performed under 3.5× loupe magnification with the use of a headlight for illumination (Designs for Vision, Bohemia, NY). With the #11-blade scalpel, a small portion of the proximal deltoid is gently peeled off the acromion to expose the underlying supraspinatus tendon (Video 1). Care is taken while peeling the deltoid off the acromion as the rotator cuff is directly under the deltoid. The cephalic vein runs along the anterior border of the deltoid consistently that marks the anterior extent of the dissection. This vessel needs to be avoided during the release of the deltoid. As the deltoid muscle is released, the supraspinatus can be identified as a shiny, white, thin structure attaching to the humerus that is no more than 2 to 3 mm in width (Fig 3). A tissue hook is then used to enter the plane between the supraspinatus tendon and the articular surface of the humeral head (Video 1). The forelimb often needs to be released of some extension and adduction during this portion of the procedure to allow the tissue hook to slide under the tendon. A 6-0 PROLENE (eSutures, Mokena, IL) double-armed suture with 9.0 taper-point needles is passed through the supraspinatus tendon medial to the suture hook in a modified Kessler suture pattern, with the second needle completing the pattern (Fig 4). The double-armed suture is critical, as it will allow each limb to be passed independently through individual bone tunnels in the proximal humerus.Fig 3Exposing the supraspinatus tendon. The supraspinatus tendon (indicated by the arrow) is exposed and elevated with a tissue probe. The arrowhead indicates the tendon enthesis (A). The diagram highlights the anatomic relationship of the greater tuberosity and the supraspinatus attachment (B).
Fig 4Suture attachment to the supraspinatus tendon. With the tissue probe elevating the supraspinatus tendon, a 6-0 PROLENE double-armed suture with 9.0 taper-point needles was passed through the supraspinatus tendon medial to the suture hook in a modified Kessler suture pattern with the second needle completing the pattern (A). The diagram indicates the location of the suture placement and modified Kessler suture pattern (B).
While traction on the stitch is maintained, the tendon is then fully released from the humerus with an #11-blade scalpel exposing the greater tuberosity. The footprint is then debrided gently using the scalpel. We create 2 crossing bone tunnels using a 27-gauge needle (0.01625-inch diameter) in a manual fashion (Fig 5, Video 1). The first tunnel starts at the anterior footprint and passes out of the lateral humerus posteroinferiorly at the level of the surgical neck. The second tunnel starts at the posterior footprint and passes out of the lateral humerus anteroinferior at the level of the surgical neck.Fig 5Generation of bone tunnels in the humeral head. Bone tunnels were manually generated with a 27-gauge needle to allow for tendon fixation. The first tunnel starts at the anterior footprint and passes out of the lateral humerus posteroinferiorly at the level of the surgical neck. The second tunnel starts at the posterior footprint and passes out of the lateral humerus anteroinferior at the level of the surgical neck. Forceps are used to stabilize the humeral head.
Next, one limb of the previously passed 6-0 PROLENE is passed through each tunnel independently (the anterior suture limb is passed through the tunnel starting at the anterior footprint and the posterior suture limb is passed through the tunnel starting at the posterior footprint) (Fig 6). The forelimb is then placed back into abduction similar to the starting position of the forelimb to allow reduction of the tendon to the footprint. The 2 suture limbs are then tied in a square knot with 4 throws (Fig 7). The deltoid is then allowed to lay back over the acromion and no direct repair of the deltoid is performed to reattach the deltoid to the acromion. The skin is closed with the remnant of the 6-0 PROLENE sutures. The superior edge of the incision is then injected with 0.1 cc of 0.25% plain lidocaine and the animals were allowed to recover from anesthesia in a recovery cage with an infrared heating pad (37°C). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were not used due to their potential for interfering with rotator cuff healing. Animals were monitored daily for signs of pain and infection. Total procedure time from start to finish was approximately 12 minutes.Fig 6Fixation of the tendon to the humeral head. The supraspinatus tendon is released from the humerus and reattached by passing the suture needles through the bone tunnels. A square knot is used to maintain adequate fixation of the tendon to the greater tuberosity.
Tashjian RZ, Kazmers NH, Epperson RT, et al. The effect of estrogen-like compound on rotator cuff tendon healing in a murine model [published online February 2, 2021]. J Orthop Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25000.
While there have been several previous studies of rotator cuff repair in mice, there are no previous detailed descriptions of surgical technique and our technique offers numerous advantages (Table 1).2Bell R. Taub P. Cagle P. Flatow E.L. Andarawis-Puri N. Development of a mouse model of supraspinatus tendon insertion site healing.,7Lebaschi A.H. Deng X.H. Camp C.L. et al.Biomechanical, histologic, and molecular evaluation of tendon healing in a new murine model of rotator cuff repair. For instance, other studies discuss using a lateral decubitus position to perform rotator cuff repairs in mice.2Bell R. Taub P. Cagle P. Flatow E.L. Andarawis-Puri N. Development of a mouse model of supraspinatus tendon insertion site healing. The supine method presented here is simple and provides excellent exposure. In addition, our technique using a 6-0 suture is easy to perform under loupe magnification commonly used in hand or microsurgery.6Tashjian RZ, Kazmers NH, Epperson RT, et al. The effect of estrogen-like compound on rotator cuff tendon healing in a murine model [published online February 2, 2021]. J Orthop Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25000.
Other studies have used 7-0 PROLENE suture or a 7-0 polydioxanone suture that is smaller and more difficult to manipulate and potentially not as strong.2Bell R. Taub P. Cagle P. Flatow E.L. Andarawis-Puri N. Development of a mouse model of supraspinatus tendon insertion site healing.,7Lebaschi A.H. Deng X.H. Camp C.L. et al.Biomechanical, histologic, and molecular evaluation of tendon healing in a new murine model of rotator cuff repair.,8Wang Z. Liu X. Davies M.R. Horne D. Kim H. Feeley B.T. A mouse model of delayed rotator cuff repair results in persistent muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration. Furthermore, previous studies have suggested a single tunnel transversely from posterior to anterior, which may not provide as good of footprint coverage as crossing tunnels which replicates the open bone tunnel repairs performed in humans.2Bell R. Taub P. Cagle P. Flatow E.L. Andarawis-Puri N. Development of a mouse model of supraspinatus tendon insertion site healing.,7Lebaschi A.H. Deng X.H. Camp C.L. et al.Biomechanical, histologic, and molecular evaluation of tendon healing in a new murine model of rotator cuff repair., 8Wang Z. Liu X. Davies M.R. Horne D. Kim H. Feeley B.T. A mouse model of delayed rotator cuff repair results in persistent muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration., 9Wang Z. Liu X. Jiang K. Kim H. Kajimura S. Feeley B.T. Intramuscular brown fat activation decreases muscle atrophy and fatty infiltration and improves gait after delayed rotator cuff repair in mice. Finally, previous studies have not described how to create the tunnels. While our initial attempts were with a power drill, the small bone makes this method very unreliable as any wobble creates critical bone loss. Our technique avoids this problem by presenting a simple method to drill the tunnels by hand using a 27-guage needle available in any clinical setting. The technique presented herein is a reproducible, robust, and simple technique for the repair of the supraspinatus in mice using materials readily available and hopefully assisting other researchers in performing these types of animal studies (Table 2).Table 2Pearls and Pitfalls
Article InfoPublication HistoryPublished online: July 13, 2021
Accepted: April 21, 2021
Received: February 24, 2021
Publication stageIn Press Corrected ProofFootnotesThe authors report the following potential conflicts of interest or sources of funding: P.N.C. reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from the Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery and DePuy, A Johnson & Johnson Company, outside the submitted work. R.Z.T. reports personal fees from Cayenne Medical, other from Conextions and INTRAFUSE, personal fees from the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery – American, and other from KATOR, Mitek, Shoulder Innovations, Zimmer , and Wright, outside the submitted work; and editorial board, the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. Full ICMJE author disclosure forms are available for this article online, as supplementary material.
IdentificationDOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.04.023
Copyright© 2021 by the Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier.
User License Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) | How you can reuse
Comments (0)