1. Monnet, X, Teboul, JL. Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients. Ann Transl Med 2020; 8: 790–790.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline2. Bentzer, P, Griesdale, DE, Boyd, J, et al. Will this hemodynamically unstable patient respond to a bolus of intravenous fluids. JAMA 2016; 316: 1298–1309.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline3. Salameh, JP, Bossuyt, PM, McGrath, TA, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist. BMJ 2020; 370: m2632.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline4. Cooper, H, Hedges, LV, Valentine, JC, et al. The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009.
Google Scholar5. Group CSDTM . Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. The Cochrane Collaboration, https://methods.cochrane.org/sdt/handbook-dta-reviews
Google Scholar6. Ouzzani, M, Hammady, H, Fedorowicz, Z, et al. Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2016; 5: 210–10.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline7. Schueler, S, Schuetz, GM, Dewey, M. The revised QUADAS-2 tool. Ann Intern Med 2012; 156: 323–author reply 323–4.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline8. Whiting, PF, Rutjes, AWS, Westwood, ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 2011; 155: 529–536.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI9. McGuinness, LA, Higgins, JPT. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synth Methods 2021; 12: 55–61.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline10. Reitsma, JB, Glas, AS, Rutjes, AWS, et al. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 2005; 58: 982–990.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI11. Barbier, C, Loubières, Y, Schmit, C, et al. Respiratory changes in inferior vena cava diameter are helpful in predicting fluid responsiveness in ventilated septic patients. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30(9): 1740–1746.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI12. Charbonneau, H, Riu, B, Faron, M, et al. Predicting preload responsiveness using simultaneous recordings of inferior and superior vena cavae diameters. Crit Care 2014; 18: 473–479.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline13. de Oliveira, OH, Freitas, FG, Ladeira, RT, et al. Comparison between respiratory changes in the inferior vena cava diameter and pulse pressure variation to predict fluid responsiveness in postoperative patients. J Crit Care 2016; 34: 46–49.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline14. Lu, N, Xi, X, Jiang, L, et al. Exploring the best predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with septic shock. Am J Emerg Med 2016; 35: 1258–1261.
Google Scholar | Crossref15. Machare-Delgado, E, Decaro, M, Marik, PE. Inferior vena cava variation compared to pulse contour analysis as predictors of fluid responsiveness: a prospective cohort study. J Intensive Care Med 2017; 26: 116–124.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals16. Moretti, R, Pizzi, B. Inferior vena cava distensibility as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurocrit Care 2011; 13: 3–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref17. Sobczyk, D, Nycz, K, Andruszkiewicz, P, et al. Ultrasonographic caval indices do not significantly contribute to predicting fluid responsiveness immediately after coronary artery bypass grafting when compared to passive leg raising. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 2010; 14: 23–28.
Google Scholar | Crossref18. Theerawit, P, Morasert, T, Sutherasan, Y. Inferior vena cava diameter variation compared with pulse pressure variation as predictors of fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis. J Crit Care 2016; 36: 246–251.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline19. Vignon, P, Repessé, X, Bégot, E, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic indices used to predict fluid responsiveness in ventilated patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 195: 1022–1032.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline20. Yao, B, Liu, JY, Sun, YB, et al. The value of the inferior vena cava area distensibility index and its diameter ratio for predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients. Shock 2019; 52(1): 37–42.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline21. Zhang, H, Zhang, Q, Chen, X, et al. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava fail to predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with isolated left ventricular dysfunction. Ann Intensive Care 2019; 9: 113–119.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline22. Airapetian, N, Maizel, J, Alyamani, O, et al. Does inferior vena cava respiratory variability predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients? Crit Care 2015; 19: 400–408.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline23. Bortolotti, P, Colling, D, Colas, V, et al. Respiratory changes of the inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with cardiac arrhythmias. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8: 79–12.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline24. Corl, KA, George, NR, Romanoff, J, et al. Inferior vena cava collapsibility detects fluid responsiveness among spontaneously breathing critically-ill patients. J Crit Care 2017; 41: 130–137.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline25. Corl, KA, Azab, N, Nayeemuddin, M, et al. Performance of a 25% inferior vena cava collapsibility in detecting fluid responsiveness when assessed by novice versus expert physician sonologists. J Intensive Care Med 2020; 35: 1520–1528.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals26. Lanspa, MJ, Grissom, CK, Hirshberg, EL, et al. Applying dynamic parameters to predict hemodynamic response to volume expansion in spontaneously breathing patients with septic shock. Shock 2013; 39: 155–160.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline27. McGregor, D, Sharma, S, Gupta, S, et al. Emergency department non-invasive cardiac output study (EDNICO): an accuracy study. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 2020; 28: 8–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline28. Muller, L, Bobbia, X, Toumi, M, et al. Respiratory variations of inferior vena cava diameter to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with acute circulatory failure: need for a cautious use. Crit Care 2012; 16: R188.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI29. Preau, S, Bortolotti, P, Colling, D, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the inferior vena cava collapsibility to predict fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with sepsis and acute circulatory failure. Crit Care Med 2017; 45(3): e290–e297.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline30. Feissel, M, Michard, F, Faller, JP, et al. The respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter as a guide to fluid therapy. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30(9): 1834–1837.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI31. Ma, GG, Hao, GW, Yang, XM, et al. Internal jugular vein variability predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients with mechanical ventilation. Ann Intensive Care 2018; 8: 6–9.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline32. Orso, D, Paoli, I, Piani, T, et al. Accuracy of ultrasonographic measurements of inferior vena cava to determine fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Intensive Care Med 2020; 35: 354–363.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI33. Mandeville, JC, Colebourn, CL. Can transthoracic echocardiography be used to predict fluid responsiveness in the critically ill patient? A systematic review. Crit Care Res Pract 2012; 2012: 513480.
Google Scholar | Medline34. Zhang, X, Luan, H, Zhu, P, et al. Does ultrasonographic measurement of the inferior vena cava diameter correlate with central venous pressure in the assessment of intravascular volume in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery? J Surg Res 2014; 191: 339–343.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline35. Long, E, Oakley, E, Duke, T, et al. Does respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Shock 2017; 47: 550–559.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline36. Si, X, Xu, H, Liu, Z, et al. Does respiratory variation in inferior vena cava diameter predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg 2018; 127: 1157–1164.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline37. Huang, H, Shen, Q, Liu, Y, et al. Value of variation index of inferior vena cava diameter in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with circulatory shock receiving mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care 2018; 22: 204–207.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline