Severe maternal morbidity in the United States.
()Creanga A.A. Berg C.J. Ko J.Y. Farr S.L. Tong V.T. Bruce F.C. et al.Maternal mortality and morbidity in the United States: where are we now?.
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 23: 3-9Wright V.C. Schieve L.A. Reynolds M.A. Jeng G.Assisted reproductive technology surveillance--United States, 2000.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 52: 1-16Creanga A.A. Syverson C. Seed K. Callaghan W.M.Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011–2013.
Obstet Gynecol. 130: 366-373Luke B. Gopal D. Cabral H. Stern J.E. Diop H.Pregnancy, birth, and infant outcomes by maternal fertility status: the Massachusetts Outcomes Study of Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 217: 327.e1-327.e14Luke B. Brown M.B. Wantman E. Baker V.L. Doody K.J. Seifer D.B. et al.Risk of severe maternal morbidity by maternal fertility status: a US study in 8 states.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 220: 195.e1-195.e12Pandey S. Shetty A. Hamilton M. Bhattacharya S. Maheshwari A.Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in singleton pregnancies resulting from IVF/ICSI: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Hum Reprod Update. 18: 485-503Chandra A. Copen C.E. Stephen E.H.Infertility service use in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 1982–2010.
Natl Health Stat Report. : 1-21Sunderam S. Kissin D.M. Crawford S.B. Folger S.G. Boulet S.L. Warner L. et al.Assisted reproductive technology surveillance - United States, 2015.
MMWR Surveill Summ. 67: 1-28Murugappan G. Li S. Lathi R.B. Baker V.L. Eisenberg M.L.Risk of cancer in infertile women: analysis of US claims data.
Hum Reprod. 34: 894-902Murugappan G. Li S. Lathi R.B. Baker V.L. Eisenberg M.L.Increased risk of incident chronic medical conditions in infertile women: analysis of US claims data.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 220: 473.e1-473.e14Murugappan G. Li S. Lathi R.B. Baker V.L. Luke B. Eisenberg M.L.Increased risk of severe maternal morbidity among infertile women: analysis of US claims data.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 223: 404.e1-404.e20Martin A.S. Monsour M. Kissin D.M. Jamieson D.J. Callaghan W.M. Boulet S.L.Trends in severe maternal morbidity after assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2008–2012.
Obstet Gynecol. 127: 59-66American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsACOG committee opinion no. 762: prepregnancy counseling.
Obstet Gynecol. 133: e78-e89Coleman P.K. Reardon D.C. Calhoun B.C.Reproductive history patterns and long-term mortality rates: a Danish, population-based record linkage study.
Eur J Public Health. 23: 569-574Barclay K. Keenan K. Grundy E. Kolk M. Myrskylä M.Reproductive history and post-reproductive mortality: a sibling comparison analysis using Swedish register data.
Soc Sci Med. 155: 82-92Sutton E.F. Rogan S.C. Lopa S. Sharbaugh D. Muldoon M.F. Catov J.M.Early pregnancy blood pressure elevations and risk for maternal and neonatal morbidity.
Obstet Gynecol. 136: 129-139Lisonkova S. Potts J. Muraca G.M. Razaz N. Sabr Y. Chan W.-S. et al.Maternal age and severe maternal morbidity: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
PLoS Med. 14e1002307Leonard S.A. Main E.K. Carmichael S.L.The contribution of maternal characteristics and cesarean delivery to an increasing trend of severe maternal morbidity.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 19: 16Main E.K. Abreo A. McNulty J. Gilbert W. McNally C. Poeltler D. et al.Measuring severe maternal morbidity: validation of potential measures.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 214: 643.e1-643.e10Bateman B.T. Mhyre J.M. Hernandez-Diaz S. Huybrechts K.F. Fischer M.A. Creanga A.A. et al.Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients.
Obstet Gynecol. 122: 957-965von Elm E. Altman D.G. Egger M. Pocock S.J. Gøtzsche P.C. Vandenbroucke J.P. STROBE InitiativeThe Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.
Ann Intern Med. 147: 573-577Collins G.S. Reitsma J.B. Altman D.G. Moons K.G.M.Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement.
Br Med J. 350: g7594MacDonald S.C. Cohen J.M. Panchaud A. McElrath T.F. Huybrechts K.F. Hernández-Diaz S.Identifying pregnancies in insurance claims data: methods and application to retinoid teratogenic surveillance.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 28: 1211-1221Leonard S.A. Kennedy C.J. Carmichael S.L. Lyell D.J. Main E.K.An expanded obstetric comorbidity scoring system for predicting severe maternal morbidity.
Obstet Gynecol. 136: 440-449Leonard S.A. Main E.K. Scott K.A. Profit J. Carmichael S.L.Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity prevalence and trends.
Ann Epidemiol. 33: 30-36Leonard S.A. Carmichael S.L. Main E.K. Lyell D.J. Abrams B.Risk of severe maternal morbidity in relation to prepregnancy body mass index: roles of maternal co-morbidities and caesarean birth.
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 34: 460-468Grobman W.A. Bailit J.L. Rice M.M. Wapner R.J. Reddy U.M. Varner M.W. et al.Frequency of and factors associated with severe maternal morbidity.
Obstet Gynecol. 123: 804-810Lyndon A. Lee H.C. Gilbert W.M. Gould J.B. Lee K.A.Maternal morbidity during childbirth hospitalization in California.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 25: 2529-2535Easter S.R. Bateman B.T. Sweeney V.H. Manganaro K. Lassey S.C. Gagne J.J. et al.A comorbidity-based screening tool to predict severe maternal morbidity at the time of delivery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 221: 271.e1-271.e10Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing.
J R Stat Soc Series B Methodol. 57: 289-300The precision-recall plot is more informative than the ROC plot when evaluating binary classifiers on imbalanced datasets.
PLoS One. 10e0118432American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society for Maternal-Fetal MedicineObstetric care consensus no. 7: placenta accreta spectrum.
Obstet Gynecol. 132: e259-e275Regitz-Zagrosek V. Blomstrom Lundqvist C. Borghi C. Cifkova R. Ferreira R. Foidart J.M. et al.ESC Committee for Practice GuidelinesESC guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
Eur Heart J. 32: 3147-3197Zepiridis L.I. Grimbizis G.F. Tarlatzis B.C.Infertility and uterine fibroids.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 34: 66-73Vesco K.K. Ferrante S. Chen Y. Rhodes T. Black C.M. Allen-Ramey F.Costs of severe maternal morbidity during pregnancy in US commercially insured and Medicaid populations: an observational study.
Matern Child Health J. 24: 30-38World Health Organization, Global Health Observatory Data Repository/World Health StatisticsPrevalence of anemia among women of reproductive age (% of women age 15–49). The World Bank Data.
()Verma I. Sood R. Juneja S. Kaur S.Prevalence of hypothyroidism in infertile women and evaluation of response of treatment for hypothyroidism on infertility.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2: 17-19Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive MedicineSubclinical hypothyroidism in the infertile female population: a guideline.
Fertil Steril. 104: 545-553Costello M.F. Misso M.L. Balen A. Boyle J. Devoto L. Garad R.M. et al.Evidence summaries and recommendations from the international evidence-based guideline for the assessment and management of polycystic ovary syndrome: assessment and treatment of infertility.
Hum Reprod Open. 2019hoy021Implicit bias in healthcare professionals: a systematic review.
BMC Med Ethics. 18: 19Creanga A.A. Bateman B.T. Kuklina E.V. Callaghan W.M.Racial and ethnic disparities in severe maternal morbidity: a multistate analysis, 2008-2010.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 210: 435.e1-435.e8Vyas D.A. Eisenstein L.G. Jones D.S.Hidden in plain sight - reconsidering the use of race correction in clinical algorithms.
N Engl J Med. 383: 874-882Racial and ethnic disparities in assisted reproductive technology access and outcomes.
Fertil Steril. 105: 1119-1123Dar S. Lazer T. Swanson S. Silverman J. Wasser C. Moskovtsev S.I. et al.Assisted reproduction involving gestational surrogacy: an analysis of the medical, psychosocial and legal issues: experience from a large surrogacy program.
Hum Reprod. 30: 345-352
Comments (0)