Medical and surgical interventions to improve the quality of life for endometriosis patients: a systematic review

1.

Angioni S (2017) New insights on endometriosis. Minerva Ginecol 69(5):438–439. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04089-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

2.

Pontis A, Arena I, Angioni S (2014) Umbilical endometriosis primary site without pelvic endometriosis and previous surgery: a case report. G Ital di Ostet e Ginecol 36:336–338. https://doi.org/10.11138/giog/2014.36.2.336

Article  Google Scholar 

3.

Eisenberg VH, Weil C, Chodick G, Shalev V (2018) Epidemiology of endometriosis: a large population-based database study from a healthcare provider with 2 million members. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol 125(1):55–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.14711

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

4.

Stochino-Loi E, Millochau J-C, Angioni S et al (2020) Relationship between patient age and disease features in a prospective cohort of 1560 women affected by endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 27(5):1158–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2019.09.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

5.

Melis I, Agus M, Pluchino N et al (2014) Alexithymia in women with deep endometriosis? A pilot study. J Endometr 6(1):26–33. https://doi.org/10.5301/je.5000172

Article  Google Scholar 

6.

Melis I, Litta P, Nappi L et al (2015) Sexual function in women with deep endometriosis: correlation with quality of life, intensity of pain, depression, anxiety, and body image. Int J Sex Health 27. https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2014.952394

7.

Angioni S, Cela V, Sedda F et al (2015) Focusing on surgery results in infertile patients with deep endometriosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 31(8):595–598. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2015.1062868

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8.

Alio L, Angioni S, Arena S et al (2019) Endometriosis: seeking optimal management in women approaching menopause. Climacteric 22(4):329–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13697137.2018.1549213

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9.

Stochino-Loi E, Darwish B, Mircea O et al (2017) Does preoperative antimüllerian hormone level influence postoperative pregnancy rate in women undergoing surgery for severe endometriosis? Fertil Steril 107(3):707–713.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.013

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10.

Deiana D, Gessa S, Anardu M et al (2019) Genetics of endometriosis: a comprehensive review. Gynecol Endocrinol 35:553–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2019.1588244

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11.

Angioni S, D’alterio MN, Coiana A et al (2020) Genetic characterization of endometriosis patients: review of the literature and a prospective cohort study on a mediterranean population. Int J Mol Sci 21(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21051765

12.

Viganó D, Zara F, Pinto S et al (2020) How is small bowel permeability in endometriosis patients? A case control pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol 36(11):1010–1014. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2020.1766440

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13.

Murgia F, Angioni S, D’Alterio MN et al (2021) Metabolic profile of patients with severe endometriosis: a prospective experimental study. Reprod Sci 28(3):728–735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00370-9

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14.

Triolo O, Laganà AS, Sturlese E (2013) Chronic pelvic pain in endometriosis: an overview. J Clin Med Res 5(3):153–163. https://doi.org/10.4021/jocmr1288w

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15.

Angioni S, Cofelice V, Sedda F et al (2015) Progestins for symptomatic endometriosis: results of clinical studies. Curr Drug Ther 10(2):91–104. https://doi.org/10.2174/157488551002151222160051

CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

16.

Jia SZ, Leng JH, Shi JH et al (2012) Health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis: a systematic review. J Ovarian Res 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-2215-5-29

17.

Vitale SG, La Rosa VL, Rapisarda AMC, Laganà AS (2017) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and psychological well-being. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 38(4):317–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2016.1244185

Article  Google Scholar 

18.

D’Alterio MN, D’Ancona G, Raslan M et al (2020) Management challenges of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Int J Fertil Steril. https://doi.org/10.22074/ijfs.2020.134689

19.

Vignali M, Belloni GM, Pietropaolo G et al (2020) Effect of dienogest therapy on the size of the endometrioma. Gynecol Endocrinol. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2020.1725965

20.

Angioni S, Pontis A, Malune ME et al (2020) Is dienogest the best medical treatment for ovarian endometriomas? Results of a multicentric case control study. Gynecol Endocrinol 36(1):84–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2019.1640674

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21.

Melis GB, Neri M, Corda V et al (2016) Overview of elagolix for the treatment of endometriosis. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 12(5):581–588. https://doi.org/10.1517/17425255.2016.1171316

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22.

Alessandro P, Luigi N, Felice S et al (2017) Research development of a new GnRH antagonist (Elagolix) for the treatment of endometriosis: a review of the literature. Arch Gynecol Obstet 295(4):827–832. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4328-6

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23.

Parazzini F, Viganò P, Candiani M, Fedele L (2013) Diet and endometriosis risk: a literature review. Reprod BioMed Online 26(4):323–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.12.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

24.

Stochino-Loi E, Pontis A, Cofelice V et al (2019) Effect of ultramicronized-palmitoylethanolamide and co-micronizedpalmitoylethanolamide/polydatin on chronic pelvic pain and quality of life in endometriosis patients: an open-label pilot study. Int J Women's Health 11:443–449. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S204275

Article  Google Scholar 

25.

Endometriosis Treatment Italian Club (ETIC) (2019, 2019) When more is not better: 10 “Don’ts” in endometriosis management. An ETIC position statement. Hum Reprod Open (3):hoz009. https://doi.org/10.1093/HROPEN/HOZ009

26.

Angioni S, Pontis A, Cela V et al (2015) Surgical technique of endometrioma excision impacts on the ovarian reserve. Single-port access laparoscopy versus multiport access laparoscopy: a case control study. Gynecol Endocrinol 31(6):454–457. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2015.1017812

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27.

Nappi L, Angioni S, Sorrentino F et al (2016) Anti-Mullerian hormone trend evaluation after laparoscopic surgery of monolateral endometrioma using a new dual wavelengths laser system (DWLS) for hemostasis. Gynecol Endocrinol 32(1):34–37. https://doi.org/10.3109/09513590.2015.1068754

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

28.

The WHOQOL Group (1993) Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 2(2):153–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00435734

Article  Google Scholar 

29.

Cagnacci A, Della Vecchia E, Xholli A (2019) Chronic pelvic pain improvement: impact on quality of life and mood. Gynecol Endocrinol 35(6):502–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09513590.2018.1540571

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

30.

Eriksen HLF, Gunnersen KF, Sørensen JA et al (2008) Psychological aspects of endometriosis: differences between patients with or without pain on four psychological variables. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 139(1):100–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.10.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31.

Tripoli TM, Sato H, Sartori MG et al (2011) Evaluation of quality of life and sexual satisfaction in women suffering from chronic pelvic pain with or without endometriosis. J Sex Med 8(2):497–503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01976.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

32.

Denny E (2009) “I never know from one day to another how I will feel”: pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qual Health Res 19(7):985–995. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732309338725

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33.

Facchin F, Barbara G, Saita E et al (2015) Impact of endometriosis on quality of life and mental health: pelvic pain makes the difference. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 36(4):135–141. https://doi.org/10.3109/0167482X.2015.1074173

Article  Google Scholar 

34.

Gao X, Yeh YC, Outley J et al (2006) Health-related quality of life burden of women with endometriosis: a literature review. Curr Med Res Opin 22(9):1787–1797. https://doi.org/10.1185/030079906X121084

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

35.

Marinho MCP, Magalhaes TF, Fernandes LFC et al (2018) Quality of life in women with endometriosis: an integrative review. J Women's Health 27(3):399–408. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2017.6397

Article  Google Scholar 

36.

Bourdel N, Chauvet P, Billone V et al (2019) Systematic review of quality of life measures in patients with endometriosis. PLoS One 14(1):e0208464. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208464

CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

37.

Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 30(6):473–483

Article  Google Scholar 

38.

Stull DE, Wasiak R, Kreif N et al (2014) Validation of the SF-36 in patients with endometriosis. Qual Life Res 23(1):103–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-013-0442-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

39.

Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK et al (1998) Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. J Clin Epidemiol 51(11):1171–1178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00109-7

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

40.

Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S (2004) Evaluating the responsiveness of the endometriosis health profile questionnaire: the EHP-30. Qual Life Res 13(3):705–713. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000021316.79349.af

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

41.

Jones G, Jenkinson C, Kennedy S (2004) Development of the short form endometriosis health profile questionnaire: the EHP-5. Qual Life Res 13(3):695–704. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:QURE.0000021321.48041.0e

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42.

Skevington SM, Bradshaw J, Saxena S (1999) Selecting national items for the WHOQOL: conceptual and psychometric considerations. Soc Sci Med 48(4):473–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00355-4

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

43.

Skevington SM, Carse MS, De C, Williams AC (2001) Validation of the WHOQOL-100: pain management improves quality of life for chronic pain patients. Clin J Pain 17(3):264–275. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002508-200109000-00013

CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

44.

Balestroni G, Bertolotti G (2012) EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D): an instrument for measuring quality of life. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis - Card Ser 78(3):155–159. https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2012.121

Article  Google Scholar 

45.

Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M et al (2016) Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Rev Esp Nutr Humana y Diet 20(2):148–160. https://doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-4-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif