Hesni S, Baxter D, Saifuddin A (2023) The imaging of cervical spondylotic myeloradiculopathy. Skeletal Radiol 52(12):2341–2365
Lannon M, Kachur E (2021) Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Clinical Presentation, Assessment, and Natural History. J Clin Med 10(16):3626
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 40–A(3):607–624
Li P, Lei RB, Gan L, Shangguan L, Liang ZW, Chang L et al (2023) Comparing Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes Between the Self-locking Stand-alone Cage and Conventional Cage-plate Construct: A Five-year Retrospective Cohort Study. Spine 48(1):56–66
Zhang B, Jiang YZ, Song QP, An Y (2022) Outcomes of cervical degenerative disc disease treated by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking fusion cage. World J Clin Cases 10(15):4776–4784
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zavras AG, Nolte MT, Sayari AJ, Singh K, Colman MW (2022) Stand-Alone Cage Versus Anterior Plating for 1-Level and 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion A Randomized Controlled Trial. Clin Spine Surg 35(4):155–165
Guo J, Jin WM, Shi Y, Guan ZP, Wen J, Huang YC et al (2022) Is the Zero-P Spacer Suitable for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery in Terms of Sagittal Alignment Reconstruction: A Comparison Study with Traditional Plate and Cage System. Brain Sci 12(11):1583
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sharma JK, Varma KKK, Mallepally AR, Marathe N, Rustagi T, Mohapatra B et al (2022) Two-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion versus Hybrid Total Disc Replacement for Bilevel Pathology with Cervical Radiculopathy/Myelopathy: A Comparative Study with a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up in an Indian Population. Asian Spine J 16(4):493–501
Romero-Rangel JAI, Soriano-Solis S, Rodriguez-Garcia M, Soto-Garcia ME, Soriano-Solis H, Aranda-Torres BY et al (2020) Dysphagia rates after minimally invasive tubular approach to the anterior cervical spine. Cir Cir 88(3):286–291
Charalampidis A, Hejrati N, Ramakonar H, Kalsi PS, Massicotte EM, Fehlings MG (2022) Clinical outcomes and revision rates following four-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Sci Rep 12(1):5339
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tang L, Liu XM, Lu YH, Liu YB, Yu JM, Zhao J (2023) Clinical and imaging outcomes of self-locking stand-alone cages and anterior cage-with-plate in three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a retrospective comparative study. J Orthop Surg Res 18(1):276
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Liang Y, Xu S, Yu GJ, Zhu ZQ, Liu HY (2021) Cervical spine alignment and clinical outcomes after multilevel anterior cervical decompression and fusion with or without plate A minimal 5-year follow-up of a CONSORT-compliant article. Medicine 100(30):e26126
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang XB, Yuan WH, An JD, Li SL, Zhang RH, Hu YC et al (2021) Comparison between zero-profile and cage plate devices in the treatment of single-level cervical spondylopathy. Brit J Neurosurg. 1–6
Xiao BW, Wu BX, Rong TH, Cui W, Sang DC, Liu BG (2021) Clinical impact of 3-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on the occipito-atlantoaxial complex: a retrospective study of patients who received a zero-profile anchored spacer versus cage-plate construct. Eur Spine J 30(12):3656–3665
Abudouaini H, Wu TK, Liu H, Wang BY, Chen H, Li LJ (2022) Comparison of the Postoperative Motion Stabilization Between Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with a Zero-Profile Implant System and a Plate-Cage Construct. World Neurosurg 166:E484–E94
Zhang D, Liu BG, Zhu JC, Li CX, Wei FN, Yuan Y et al (2019) Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Self-Locking Stand-Alone Cage and Cage with Anterior Plate for Multilevel Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 125:E117–E31
Tong MJ, Xiang GH, He ZL, Chen DH, Tang Q, Xu HZ et al (2017) Zero-Profile Spacer Versus Cage-Plate Construct in Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion for Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. World Neurosurg 104:545–553
Sun B, Shi CG, Wu HQ, Xu Z, Lin WB, Shen XL et al (2020) Application of Zero-profile Spacer in the Treatment of Three-level Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy 5-year Follow-up Results. Spine 45(8):504–511
Chen ZP, Cen SZ, Wu JL, Guo R, Liu ZH, Gao LB (2021) Use of zero-profile device for contiguous three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: comparison with cage and plate construct. J Neurosurgery-Spine 35(2):219–226
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Int J Surg 88:105906
Shea BJ, Reeves BC, Wells G, Thuku M, Hamel C, Moran J et al (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358:j4008
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhu D, Zhang D, Liu BG, Li CX, Zhu JC (2019) Can Self-Locking Cages Offer the Same Clinical Outcomes as Anterior Cage-with-Plate Fixation for 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) in Mid-Term Follow-Up? Med Sci Monit 25:547–557
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen Y, Liu Y, Chen H, Cao P, Yuan W (2017) Comparison of Curvature between the Zero-P Spacer and Traditional Cage and Plate after 3-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion. Clin Spine Surg 30(8):E1111–E6
Chen YQ, Lu GH, Wang B, Li L, Kuang L (2016) A comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using self-locking stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage with ACDF using cage and plate in the treatment of three-level cervical degenerative spondylopathy: a retrospective study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 25(7):2255–2262
Shi S, Liu ZD, Li XF, Qian L, Zhong GB, Chen FJ (2015) Comparison of plate-cage construct and stand-alone anchored spacer in the surgical treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a preliminary clinical study. Spine J 15(9):1973–1980
Zhao HH, Xu HW, Wang SJ, Hu T, Wu DS (2024) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a zero-profile VA spacer device: a clinical and radiological study with two-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 19(1):51
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Abudouaini H, Xu H, Yang JS, Yi MB, Lin KY, Wang SB (2023) Comparison of the effectiveness of zero-profile device and plate cage construct in the treatment of one-level cervical disc degenerative disease combined with moderate to severe paraspinal muscle degeneration. Front Endocrinol 14:1283795
Zhang J, Wang SX, Tang XY, Xiong W, Wu H, Liu CX et al (2022) Clinical and radiological comparison of the zero-profile anchored cage and traditional cage-plate fixation in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Eur J Med Res 27(1):189
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Scholz M, Schleicher P, Pabst S, Kandziora F (2015) A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40(7):E375–E380
Kinon MD, Greeley SL, Harris JA, Gelfand Y, Yassari R, Nakhla J et al (2020) Biomechanical evaluation comparing zero-profile devices versus fixed profile systems in a cervical hybrid decompression model: a biomechanical in vitro study. Spine J 20(4):657–664
Kao TH, Wu CH, Chou YC, Chen HT, Chen WH, Tsou HK (2014) Risk factors for subsidence in anterior cervical fusion with stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages: a review of 82 cases and 182 levels. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134(10):1343–1351
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Zhang Y, Ju JD, Wu JC (2023) Self-locking stand-alone cage versus cage-plate fixation in monosegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res 18(1):403
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Borm W, Seitz K (2004) Use of cervical stand-alone cages. Eur Spine J 13(5):474–475 author reply 6–7
Comments (0)