Scoping review of magnetic resonance motion imaging phantoms

Liang Z-P, Lauterbur P (2000) Principles of. Magn Reson Imaging. https://doi.org/10.1109/9780470545652.ch8

Article  Google Scholar 

Zaitsev M, Maclaren J, Herbst M (2015) Motion artifacts in MRI: a complex problem with many partial solutions. J Magn Reson Imaging 42:887–901

Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Earls JP, Ho VB, Foo TK, Castillo E, Flamm SD (2002) Cardiac MRI: recent progress and continued challenges. J Magn Reson Imaging 16:111–127

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Luetkens JA, Kupczyk PA, Doerner J, Fimmers R, Willinek WA, Schild HH, Kukuk GM (2015) Respiratory motion artefacts in dynamic liver MRI: a comparison using gadoxetate disodium and gadobutrol. Eur Radiol 25:3207–3213

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bulas D, Egloff A (2013) Benefits and risks of MRI in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol 37:301–304

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rehwald WG, Reeder SB, McVeigh ER, Judd RM (1997) Techniques for high-speed cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in rats and rabbits. Magn Reson Med 37:124–130

Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saotome K, Matsushita A, Matsumoto K, Kato Y, Nakai K, Murata K, Yamamoto T, Sankai Y, Matsumura A (2017) A brain phantom for motion-corrected PROPELLER showing image contrast and construction similar to those of in vivo MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 36:32–39

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Weidner A, Stengl C, Dinkel F, Dorsch S, Murillo C, Seeber S, Gnirs R, Runz A, Echner G, Karger CP, Jäkel O (2022) An abdominal phantom with anthropomorphic organ motion and multimodal imaging contrast for MR-guided radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ac4ef8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Swailes NE, MacDonald ME, Frayne R (2011) Dynamic phantom with heart, lung, and blood motion for initial validation of MRI techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 34:941–946

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fieseler M, Kugel H, Gigengack F, Kos̈ters T, Buẗher F, Quick HH, Faber C, Jiang X, Schäfers KP (2013) A dynamic thorax phantom for the assessment of cardiac and respiratory motion correction in PET/MRI: a preliminary evaluation. Nucl Instr Methods Phys Res Sect A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors Assoc Equip 702:59–63

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Vali A, Schmitter S, Ma L, Flassbeck S, Schmidt S, Markl M, Schnell S (2020) Development of a rotation phantom for phase contrast MRI sequence validation and quality control. Magn Reson Med 84:3333–3341

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saenz DL, Yan Y, Christensen N, Henzler MA, Forrest LJ, Bayouth JE, Paliwal BR (2015) Characterization of a 0.35T MR system for phantom image quality stability and in vivo assessment of motion quantification. J Appl Clin Med Phys 16:30–40

Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim T, Lewis B, Lotey R, Barberi E, Green O (2021) Clinical experience of MRI4D QUASAR motion phantom for latency measurements in 0.35T MR-LINAC. J Appl Clin Med Phys 22:128–136

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rai R, Wang YF, Manton D, Dong B, Deshpande S, Liney GP (2019) Development of multi-purpose 3D printed phantoms for MRI. Phys Med Biol. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ab0b49

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Parent L, Nemtanu T, Celicanin Z, Bieri O, Cattin P, Ken S (2018) EP-2190: quantitative evaluation of a new 4D MRI sequence: a motion phantom study. Radiother Oncol 127:S1210–S1211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(18)32499-X

Article  Google Scholar 

Borman P, Woodhead P, Perrin M, Barberi E, Lagendijk J, Raaymakers B, Fast M (2020) OC-0706: first MRI-guided MLC-tracking using a deformable motion phantom. Radiother Oncol 152:S397–S398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(21)00728-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Lamb JM, Ginn JS, O’Connell DP, Agazaryan N, Cao M, Thomas DH, Yang Y, Lazea M, Lee P, Low DA (2017) Dosimetric validation of a magnetic resonance image gated radiotherapy system using a motion phantom and radiochromic film. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:163–169

Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schneider S, Dolde K, Engler J, Hoffmann A, Pfaffenberger A (2019) Commissioning of a 4D MRI phantom for use in MR-guided radiotherapy. Med Phys 46:25–33

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dolde K, Schneider S, Pfaffenberger A, Hoffmann A (2018) 3D motion validation with clinically used cine-MRI and an MR-LINAC phantom. Radiother Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(18)31251-9

Article  Google Scholar 

Liu X, Li C, Zhu J, Gong G, Sun H, Li X, Sun M, Zhang Z, Li B, Yin Y, Li Z (2021) Technical Note: End-to-end verification of an MR-Linac using a dynamic motion phantom. Med Phys 48:5479–5489

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kavaluus H, Koivula L, Salli E, Seppälä T, Saarilahti K, Tenhunen M (2022) Motion modeling from 4D MR images of liver simulating phantom. J Appl Clin Méd Phys 23:e13611

Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Constantinides C, Zhong X, Tzagkarakis V, Cofer G, Gravett R (2013) Emulation of human and rodent cardiac motion with a computer-controlled cardiac phantom using DENSE MRI. Concepts Magn Resonance Part A Bridging Educ Res 42:59–71

Article  Google Scholar 

Tavakoli V, Kendrick M, Shakeri M, Alshaher M, Stoddard M, Amini A (2013) A multimodal (MRI/Ultrasound) cardiac phantom for imaging experiments. In: Progress in biomedical optics and imaging - proceedings of SPIE. 8672:02. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2008783.

Rabe M, Paganelli C, Riboldi M, Bondesson D, Schneider MJ, Chmielewski T, Baroni G, Dinkel J, Reiner M, Landry G, Parodi K, Belka C, Kamp F, Kurz C (2021) Porcine lung phantom-based validation of estimated 4D-MRI using orthogonal cine imaging for low-field MR-Linacs. Phys Med Biol 66:055006

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khan S, Wilde JD (2003) Design of a dynamic cardiac MR phantom for the evaluation of cardiac MR systems. Int Congr Ser 1256:1165–1170

Article  Google Scholar 

Sternberg NC von, Hedayati YS, Zaid HM, Yeniaras E, Christoforou E, Tsekos NV (2012) An actuated phantom for developing and studying mri-guided interventions in dynamic environments. In: The fourth IEEE RAS/EMBS international conference on biomedical robotics and biomechatronics. pp 1669–1674

Huber M, Stuber M, Botnar R, Boesiger P, Manning W (2000) Low-cost MR-compatible moving heart phantom. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2:181–187

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sagias G, Yiallouras C, Ioannides K, Damianou C (2016) An MRI-conditional motion phantom for the evaluation of high-intensity focused ultrasound protocols. Int J Méd Robot Comput Assist Surg 12:431–441

Article  Google Scholar 

Merxem AG de, Macq BM, Lechien V, Thibault T, Dasnoy D (2017) Design and implementation of a MRI compatible and dynamic phantom simulating the motion of a tumor in the liver under the breathing cycle. In: 13th international symposium on medical information processing and analysis. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2285620

Chang Z, Cai J, Wang Z, Yin F-F (2011) Evaluation of motion measurement using cine MRI for image guided stereotactic body radiotherapy on a new phantom platform. J Radiosurg SBRT 1:109–115

PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hatt CR, Stanton D, Parthasarathy V, Jain AK, Raval AN (2011) A method for measuring the accuracy of multi-modal image fusion system for catheter-based cardiac interventions using a novel motion enabled targeting phantom. In: 33rd annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS. pp 6260–6264

Bing C, Cheng B, Staruch RM, Nofiele J, Staruch MW, Szczepanski D, Farrow-Gillespie A, Yang A, Laetsch TW, Chopra R (2019) Breath-hold MR-HIFU hyperthermia: phantom and in vivo feasibility. Int J Hyperth 36:1083–1096

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Yue Y, Fan Z, Yang W, Pang J, Deng Z, McKenzie E, Tuli R, Wallace R, Li D, Fraass B (2015) Geometric validation of self-gating k-space-sorted 4D-MRI vs 4D-CT using a respiratory motion phantom. Med Phys 42:5787–5797

Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lee CK, Seo N, Kim B, Huh J, Kim JK, Lee SS, Kim IS, Nickel D, Kim KW (2017) The effects of breathing motion on dce-mri images: phantom studies simulating respiratory motion to compare CAIPIRINHA-VIBE, radial-VIBE, and conventional VIBE. Korean J Radiol 18:289–298

Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Einspänner E, Jochimsen TH, Harries J, Melzer A, Unger M, Brown R, Thielemans K, Sabri O, Sattler B (2022) Evaluating different methods of MR-based motion correction in simultaneous PET/MR using a head phantom moved by a robotic system. EJNMMI Phys. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00442-6

Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Melzer A, Gutmann B, Remmele T, Wolf R, Lukoscheck A, Bock M, Bardenheuer H, Fischer H (2008) INNOMOTION for percutaneous image-guided interventions. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 27:66–73

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yun J, Wachowicz K, Mackenzie M, Rathee S, Robinson D, Fallone BG (2013) First demonstration of intrafractional tumor-tracked irradiation using 2D phantom MR images on a prototype linac-MR. Méd Phys 40:051718

Comments (0)

No login
gif