Rare incompatible stimuli evoke visual mismatch negativity in a flanker task

Botvinick MM, Braver TS, Barch DM, Carter CS, Cohen JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychol Rev 108:624–652. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Braem S, Bugg JM, Schmidt JR, Crump MJ, Weissman DH, Notebaert W, Egner T (2019) Measuring adaptive control in conflict tasks. Trends Cogn Sci 23:769–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2019.07.002

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brainard DH, Vision S (1997) The psychophysics toolbox. Spat Vis 10:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897x00357

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bugg JM, Crump MJ (2012) In support of a distinction between voluntary and stimulus-driven control: a review of the literature on proportion congruent effects. Front Psychol 3:367. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bugg JM, Diede NT, Cohen-Shikora ER, Selmeczy D (2015) Expectations and experience: dissociable bases for cognitive control? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 41:1349–1373. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000106

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Czigler I (2007) Visual mismatch negativity: violation of nonattended environmental regularities. J Psychophysiol 21:224–230. https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.21.34.224

Article  Google Scholar 

Czigler I, Sulykos I (2010) Visual mismatch negativity to irrelevant changes is sensitive to task-relevant changes. Neuropsychologia 48:1277–1282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.029

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Czigler I, Balázs L, Winkler I (2002) Memory-based detection of task-irrelevant visual changes. Psychophysiology 39:869–873. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3960869

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Delorme A, Makeig S (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 134:9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Egner T (2014) Creatures of habit (and control): a multi-level learning perspective on the modulation of congruency effects. Front Psychol 5:1247. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01247

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Eriksen CW, Eriksen BA (1979) Target redundancy in visual search: do repetitions of the target within thedisplay impair processing? Percept Psychophys 26:195–205. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199869

Article  Google Scholar 

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 39:175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193146

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang A-G (2009) Statistical power analyses using G* Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41:1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fujimura T, Okanoya K (2013) Event-related potentials elicited by pre-attentive emotional changes in temporal context. PLoS ONE 8:e63703. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063703

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gratton G, Coles MG, Donchin E (1992) Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses. J Exp Psychol Gen 121:480–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kecskés-Kovács K, Sulykos I, Czigler I (2013) Is it a face of a woman or a man? visual mismatch negativity is sensitive to gender category. Front Hum Neurosci 7:532. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00532

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kimura M, Ji K, Ohira H, Schröger E (2009) Visual mismatch negativity: new evidence from the equiprobable paradigm. Psychophysiology 46:402–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2008.00767.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kimura M, Ohira H, Schröger E (2010) Localizing sensory and cognitive systems for pre-attentive visual deviance detection: an sLORETA analysis of the data Kimura et al.(2009). Neurosci Lett 485:198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2010.09.011

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kimura M, Schröger E, Czigler I (2011) Visual mismatch negativity and its importance in visual cognitive sciences. Neuroreport 22:669–673. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0b013e32834973ba

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kopp B, Rist F, Mattler U (1996) N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology 33:282–294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb00425.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kreegipuu K, Kuldkepp N, Sibolt O, Toom M, Allik J, Näätänen R (2013) vMMN for schematic faces: automatic detection of change in emotional expression. Front Hum Neurosci 7:714. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00714

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Logan GD, Zbrodoff NJ (1979) When it helps to be misled: facilitative effects of increasing the frequency of conflicting stimuli in a Stroop-like task. Mem Cognition 7:166–174. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197535

Article  Google Scholar 

Näätänen R, Paavilainen P, Rinne T, Alho K (2007) The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: a review. Clin Neurophysiol 118:2544–2590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pelli DG, Vision S (1997) The video toolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. Spat vis 10:437–442. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856897X00366

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schmidt JR, Besner D (2008) The Stroop effect: why proportion congruent has nothing to do with congruency and everything to do with contingency. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 34:514–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.3.514

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stefanics G, Kimura M, Czigler I (2011) Visual mismatch negativity reveals automatic detection of sequential regularity violation. Front Hum Neurosci 5:46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2011.00046

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stefanics G, Kremláček J, Czigler I (2014) Visual mismatch negativity: a predictive coding view. Front Hum Neurosci 8:666. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00666

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sussman E, Winkler I, Wang W (2003) MMN and attention: competition for deviance detection. Psychophysiology 40:430–435. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00045

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suzuki K (2022) Proportion compatibility effects on visual mismatch negativity in a flanker task. Biol Psychol 175:108431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108431

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suzuki K (2024a) Contingency learning on the proportional congruency effect of the Stroop task is manifest in deviant processing. NeuroReport 35:170–174. https://doi.org/10.1097/WNR.0000000000001991

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suzuki K (2024b) The effects of positions on deviant processing in mostly incompatible blocks in the flanker task. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14509

Comments (0)

No login
gif