Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L et al (2023) Best practice in interventional management of urolithiasis: an update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus 9:199–208

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ruhayel Y, Tepeler A, Dabestani S et al (2017) Tract sizes in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review from the european association of urology urolithiasis guidelines panel. Eur Urol 72:220–235

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bozzini G, Aydogan TB, Muller A et al (2020) A comparison among PCNL, Miniperc and Ultraminiperc for lower calyceal stones between 1 and 2 cm: a prospective, comparative, multicenter and randomised study. BMC Urol 20:67

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zewu Z, Cui Y, Feng Z, Yang L, Chen H (2019) Comparison of retrograde flexible ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy in treating intermediate-size renal stones (2–3cm): a meta-analysis and systematic review. Int Braz J Urol 45:10–22

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pan Y, Chen H, Chen H et al (2021) The feasibility of one-stage flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy in solitary kidney patients with 1–3 cm renal stones and risk factors of renal function changes. Ren Fail 43:264–272

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Humphreys MR, Shah OD, Monga M et al (2018) Dusting versus basketing during ureteroscopy-which technique is more efficacious? a prospective multicenter trial from the edge research consortium. J Urol 199:1272–1276

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pietropaolo A, Massella V, Ripa F, Sinha MM, Somani BK (2023) Ureteroscopy and lasertripsy with pop dusting using high power holmium laser for large urinary stones >15 mm: 6.5-year prospective outcomes from a high-volume stone center. World J Urol 41:1935–1941

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gauhar V, Teoh JY, Mulawkar PM et al (2022) Comparison and outcomes of dusting versus stone fragmentation and extraction in retrograde intrarenal surgery: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cent Eur J Urol 75(3):317

Article  Google Scholar 

Sánchez-Puy A, Bravo-Balado A, Diana P et al (2022) new generation pulse modulation in holmium:yag lasers: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. J Clin Med 11:3208

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li P, Ma Y, Yuan C, Jian Z, Wei X (2023) Comparison of the efficacy and safety of holmium laser with the Moses technology and regular mode for stone treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol 23:99

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li J, Huang Y, Zhu M et al (2023) Does Moses technology enhance the efficiency and outcomes of regular holmium laser lithotripsy? Results of a pooled analysis of comparative studies. Lasers Med Sci 38:73

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Riveros CA, Chalfant V, Melchart T, Singh G, Forero AM, Ledesma B, Klett DE (2022) Does Moses technology improve the efficiency and outcomes of standard holmium laser lithotripsy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Central Eur J Urol 75(4):409

Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ventimiglia E, Traxer O (2019) What is moses effect: a historical perspective. J Endourol 33:353–357

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ventimiglia E, Villa L, Doizi S et al (2021) Laser lithotripsy: the importance of peak power and pulse modulation. Eur Urol Focus 7:22–25

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Winship B, Terry R, Boydston K et al (2019) Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser pulse type affects irrigation temperatures in a benchtop ureteral model. J Endourol 33:896–901

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Knoedler MA, Li S, Best SL et al (2022) Clinical impact of the institution of moses technology on efficiency during retrograde ureteroscopy for stone disease: single-center experience. J Endourol 36:65–70

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mullerad M, Aguinaga J, Aro T et al (2017) Initial clinical experience with a modulated holmium laser pulse-moses technology: does it enhance laser lithotripsy efficacy? Rambam Maimonides Med J 8(4):38

Article  Google Scholar 

Pietropaolo A, Hughes T, Mani M, Somani B (2021) Outcomes of ureteroscopy and laser stone fragmentation (ursl) for kidney stone disease (KSD): comparative cohort study using moses technology 60 w laser system versus regular holmium 20 w laser. J Clin Med 10(13):2742

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ibrahim A, Elhilali MM, Fahmy N, Carrier S, Andonian S (2020) double-blinded prospective randomized clinical trial comparing regular and moses modes of holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 34:624–628

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mekayten M, Lorber A, Katafigiotis I et al (2019) will stone density stop being a key factor in Endourology? the impact of stone density on laser time using lumenis laser p120w and standard 20 W laser: a comparative study. J Endourol 33:585–589

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shrestha A, Corrales M, Adhikari B, Chapagain A, Traxer O (2022) Comparison of low power and high power holmium YAG laser settings in flexible ureteroscopy. World J Urol 40:1839–1844

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Santiago JE, Hollander AB, Soni SD, Link RE, Mayer WA (2017) To dust or not to dust: a systematic review of ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy techniques. Curr Urol Rep 18:32

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aksoy SH, Cakiroglu B, Tas T, Yurdaisik I (2022) The effects of stone density on surgical outcomes of retrograde intrarenal stone surgery. Br J Radiol 95:20220229

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Elbaset MA, Taha DE, Anas M et al (2022) Optimization of shockwave lithotripsy use for single medium sized hard renal stone with stone density >/= 1000 HU. A prospective study. World J Urol 40:243–250

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tonyali S (2019) Suctioning ureteral access sheath use in flexible ureteroscopy might decrease operation time and prevent infectious complications. World J Urol 37:393–394

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang J, Xie J, Huang X et al (2020) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for renal stones 2 cm or greater. Medicine 99:e22704

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cindolo L, Castellan P, Scoffone CM et al (2016) Mortality and flexible ureteroscopy: analysis of six cases. World J Urol 34:305–310

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baboudjian M, Gondran-Tellier B, Abdallah R et al (2019) Predictive risk factors of urinary tract infection following flexible ureteroscopy despite preoperative precautions to avoid infectious complications. World J Urol 19:856

Google Scholar