Beebe-Dimmer JL, Pfeifer JR, Engle JS, Schottenfeld D (2005) The epidemiology of chronic venous insufficiency and varicose veins. Ann Epidemiol 15(3):175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annepidem.2004.05.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bontinis V, Bontinis A, Koutsoumpelis A, Chorti A, Rafailidis V, Giannopoulos A et al (2023) A network meta-analysis on the efficacy and safety of thermal and nonthermal endovenous ablation treatments. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 11(4):854–865e855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.03.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boné C (1999) Tratamiento Endoluminal De las varices con laser de diodo. Estudio preliminar. Rev Patol Vasc, 35–46

Malskat WS, Poluektova AA, van der Geld CW, Neumann HA, Weiss RA, Bruijninckx CM et al (2014) Endovenous laser ablation (EVLA): a review of mechanisms, modeling outcomes, and issues for debate. Lasers Med Sci 29(2):393–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-013-1480-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palombi L, Morelli M, Bruzzese D, Quarto G (2023) Endovascular laser treatment. Comparison of lasers and fibers of different generations: study of temperatures and tissue damage produced on a porcine liver model. Lasers Med Sci 38(1):105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-023-03770-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shi J, Luo D, Wan X, Liu Y, Liu J, Bian Z et al (2023) Detecting the skewness of data from the five-number summary and its application in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 32(7):1338–1360. https://doi.org/10.1177/09622802231172043

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sterne JA, Hernán MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al (2016) ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ 355:i4919. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i4919

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I et al (2019) RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 366:l4898. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l4898

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saito S, Fujita A, Otsuka R, Jinbo M, Uesugi N, Kobayashi T et al (2021) Advances in Surgical procedures for Varicose veins and treatment outcomes at our hospital. Yamaguchi Med J 70(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.2342/ymj.70.17

Article  Google Scholar 

Kubat E, Ünal CS, Geldi O, Çetin E, Keskin A (2021) What is the optimal treatment technique for great saphenous vein diameter of ≥ 10 mm? Comparison of five different approaches. Acta Chir Belg 121(2):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2019.1684008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sporbert F, Zollmann C, Zollmann P, Veltman J, Gräser A, Berger I et al (2016) Endoluminal thermal ablation of the great saphenous vein (GSV) insufficiency: laser and radiofrequency results after five years. Phlebologie 45:357–362. https://doi.org/10.12687/phleb2336-6-2016

Article  Google Scholar 

Arslan Ü, Çalık E, Tort M, Yıldız Z, Tekin A, Limandal HK et al (2017) More successful results with Less Energy in Endovenous laser ablation treatment: long-term comparison of Bare-tip Fiber 980 nm laser and radial-tip Fiber 1470 nm laser application. Ann Vasc Surg 45:166–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2017.06.042

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jibiki M, Miyata T, Futatsugi S, Iso M, Sakanushi Y (2016) Effect of the wide-spread use of endovenous laser ablation on the treatment of varicose veins in Japan: a large-scale, single institute study. Laser Ther 25(3):171–177. https://doi.org/10.5978/islsm.16-OR-12

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aktas AR, Celik O, Ozkan U, Cetin M, Koroglu M, Yilmaz S et al (2015) Comparing 1470- and 980-nm diode lasers for endovenous ablation treatments. Lasers Med Sci 30(5):1583–1587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-015-1768-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hirokawa M, Ogawa T, Sugawara H, Shokoku S, Sato S (2015) Comparison of 1470 nm laser and radial 2ring Fiber with 980 nm laser and Bare-Tip Fiber in Endovenous laser ablation of Saphenous Varicose veins: a Multicenter, prospective, Randomized, non-blind study. Ann Vasc Dis 8(4):282–289. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.15-00084

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kavala A, Şişli E, TÜRkyilmaz S, Kuserlİ Y, Aykut K, KÖMÜRcÜ İ et al (2014) The comparison of 1470 and 980 nanometer Wave-Lenghts used in Endovenous laser ablation in Regard to Side effects and recanalization. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 34:345–350. https://doi.org/10.5336/medsci.2013-38037

Article  Google Scholar 

Gürkan S, Gür Ö, Arar C, Donbaloğlu MO, Ege T (2013) Comparison of manual pull back 980 nm wavelength bare tip fiber laser with automated pull back 1470 nm wavelength radial fiber laser in great saphenous vein insufficiency: analysis of early term efficacy and complications. Turkish J Vascular Surg, 22(2)

Dzieciuchowicz L, Krasiński Z, Gabriel M, Espinosa G (2011) A prospective comparison of four methods of endovenous thermal ablation. Pol Przegl Chir 83(11):597–605. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10035-011-0095-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Doganci S, Demirkilic U (2010) Comparison of 980 nm laser and bare-tip fibre with 1470 nm laser and radial fibre in the treatment of great saphenous vein varicosities: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 40(2):254–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.04.006

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Korkmaz K, Yener AÜ, Genç SB, Gedik HS, Budak AB, Çağlı K (2017) A comparison of four different endovenous ablation techniques. Turkish J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 25(2)

Setia A, Schmedt CG, Beisswenger A, Dikic S, Demhasaj S, Setia O et al (2022) Safety and efficacy of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) using 1940 nm and radial emitting fiber: 3-year results of a prospective, non-randomized study and comparison with 1470 nm. Lasers Surg Med 54(4):511–522. https://doi.org/10.1002/lsm.23500

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Palombi L, Morelli M, Bruzzese D, Quarto G Third generation of laser (> 1900) for endovenous thermoablation (EVLA) of varicose veins: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phlebology, 0(0), 02683555241227017, https://doi.org/10.1177/02683555241227017

Yamamoto T, Sakata M (2014) Influence of fibers and wavelengths on the mechanism of action of endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 2(1):61–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2013.05.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kabnick LS, Sadek M (2016) Fiber type as compared to wavelength may contribute more to improving postoperative recovery following endovenous laser ablation. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 4(3):286–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2015.12.004

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Malskat WSJ, Engels LK, Hollestein LM, Nijsten T, van den Bos RR (2019) Commonly used endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) parameters do not influence efficacy: results of a systematic review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 58(2):230–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.036

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bontinis V, Bontinis A, Koutsoumpelis A, Potouridis A, Giannopoulos A, Rafailidis V et al (2023) Endovenous thermal ablation in the treatment of large great saphenous veins of diameters > 12 mm: a systematic review meta-analysis and meta-regression. Vascular Med 28(5):449–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X231183997

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Proebstle TM, Moehler T, Gül D, Herdemann S (2005) Endovenous treatment of the great saphenous vein using a 1,320 nm nd:YAG laser causes fewer side effects than using a 940 nm diode laser. Dermatol Surg 31(12):1678–1683 discussion 1683 – 1674. https://doi.org/10.2310/6350.2005.31308

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vuylsteke M, Van Dorpe J, Roelens J, De Bo T, Mordon S (2009) Endovenous laser treatment: a morphological study in an animal model. Phlebology 24(4):166–175. https://doi.org/10.1258/phleb.2009.008070

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vuylsteke ME, Mordon SR (2012) Endovenous laser ablation: a review of mechanisms of action. Ann Vasc Surg 26(3):424–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2011.05.037

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rajendran S, Nair HR (2021) Endovenous laser ablation of incompetent great saphenous veins with 1470-nm laser using bare tip and radial fibers results in similar short-term outcomes. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord 9(5):1209–1214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.12.069

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hirokawa M, Kurihara N (2014) Comparison of Bare-Tip and Radial Fiber in Endovenous Laser ablation with 1470 nm Diode Laser. Ann Vasc Dis 7(3):239–245. https://doi.org/10.3400/avd.oa.14-00081

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rits J, Maurins U, Rabe E, Kadiss A, Prave S, Vigants R et al (2022) Lower prevalence of stump reflux after endovenous laser flush ablation of the great saphenous vein. Vasa 51(4):222–228. https://doi.org/10.1024/0301-1526/a001007