Çelik M, Durko AP, Bekkers JA, Oei FBS, Mahtab EAF, Bogers AJJC. Outcomes of surgical aortic valve replacement over three decades. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164:1742–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Head SJ, Çelik M, Kappetein AP. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. Eur Heart J. 2017;38:2183–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Isaacs AJ, Shuhaiber J, Salemi A, Isom OW, Sedrakyan A. National trends in utilization and in-hospital outcomes of mechanical versus bioprosthetic aortic valve replacements. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1262–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gozdek M, Raffa GM, Suwalski P, Kolodziejczak M, Anisimowicz L, Kubica J, et al. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;53:495–504.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bavaria JE, Desai ND, Cheung A, Petracek MR, Groh MA, Borger MA, Schaff HV. The St Jude Medical Trifecta aortic pericardial valve: results from a global, multicenter, prospective clinical study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;147:590–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lehmann S, Meyer A, Schroeter T, Uhlemann M, Fischer J, Leontyev S, Garbade J, Holzhey D, Misfeld M, Mohr FW. Midterm durability and hemodynamic performance of a third-generation bovine pericardial prosthetic aortic valve: the Leipzig experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103:1933–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phan K, Ha H, Phan S, Misfeld M, Di Eusanio M, Yan TD. Early hemodynamic performance of the third generation St Jude Trifecta aortic prosthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015;149:1567–75.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anselmi A, Ruggieri VG, Lelong B, Flecher E, Corbineau H, Langanay T, Verhoye JP, Leguerrier A. Mid-term durability of the Trifecta bioprosthesis for aortic valve replacement. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;153:21–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaneyuki D, Nakajima H, Asakura T, Yoshitake A, Tokunaga C, Tochii M, Hayashi J, Takazawa A, Izumida H, Iguchi A. Early first-generation trifecta valve failure: a case series and a review of the literature. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:86–92.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fukuhara S, Shiomi S, Yang B, Kim K, Bolling SF, Haft J, Tang P, Pagani F, Prager RL, Chetcuti S, Grossman PM, Patel HJ, Deeb GM. Early structural valve degeneration of Trifecta Bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:720–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Werner P, Gritsch J, Scherzer S, Gross C, Russo M, Coti I, Kocher A, Laufer G, Andreas M. Structural valve deterioration after aortic valve replacement with the Trifecta valve. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021;32:39–46.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vriesendorp MD, Van Lind Wijngaarden RAFD, Rao V, Moront MG, Patel HJ, Sarnowski E, Vatanpour S, Klautz RJM. An in vitro comparison of internally versus externally mounted leaflets in surgical aortic bioprostheses. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2020;30:417–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yongue C, Lopez DC, Soltesz EG, Roselli EE, Bakaeen FG, Gillinov AM, et al. Durability and performance of 2298 Trifecta aortic valve prostheses: a propensity-matched analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2021;111:1198–206.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yokoyama Y, Kuno T, Takagi H, Fukuhara S. Trifecta versus PERIMOUNT bioprosthesis for surgical aortic valve replacement; systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Surg. 2021;36:4335–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shan Y, Li J, Botin Wu, et al. Aortic viscous energy loss for assessment of valve-related hemodynamics in asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis. Radiol Cardiothorac Imaging. 2022;4:e220010.

Article  Google Scholar 

Van Kesteren F, Wollersheim LW, Baan J, et al. Four-dimensional flow MRI of stented versus stentless aortic valve bioprostheses. Euro Radiol. 2018;28:257–64.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nakano K, Hirahara N, Motomura N, Miyata H, Takamoto S. Current status of cardiovascular surgery in Japan, 2013 and 2014: a report based on the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database. 4. valvular heart surgery. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;66:13–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bach DS, Patel HJ, Kolias TJ, et al. Randomized comparison of exercise haemodynamics of freestyle, Magna Ease and Trifecta bioprostheses after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis. Eur J of Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:361–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tasca G, Redaelli P, Riva B, et al. Hemodynamic comparison between Trifecta and freestyle aortic valve during exercise in patients with small aortic root. J Card Surg. 2015;30:400–4.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hanke T, Charitos EI, Paarmann H, et al. Haemodynamic performance of a new pericardial aortic bioprosthesis during exercise and recovery: comparison with pulmonary autograft, stentless aortic bioprosthesis and healthy control groups. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;44:e295–301.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stock S, Lohmann I, Hanke T, et al. Rest and exercise haemodynamics in patients with one of two stented bioprostheses and in healthy controls with small aortic annuli. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2018;26:425–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oyama-Manabe N, Aikawa T, Tsuneta S, et al. Clinical applications of 4D flow MR imaging in aortic valvular and congenital heart disease. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2022. https://doi.org/10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0030.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar