American College Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Gynecologic Practice and Practice Committee. Female age-related fertility decline. Committee Opinion No. 589. Fertil Steril 2014;101:633–4.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019 Assisted Reproductive Technology Fertility Clinic and National Summary Report. US Dept of Health and Human Services. 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/art/artdata/index.html.

Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK. Births: final data for 2019. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021;70:1–51.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Habbema JD, Eijkemans MJ, Leridon H, te Velde ER. Realizing a desired family size: when should couples start? Hum Reprod. 2015;30:2215–21.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

te Velde E, Habbema D, Leridon H, Eijkemans M. The effect of postponement of first motherhood on permanent involuntary childlessness and total fertility rate in six European countries since the 1970s. Hum Reprod. 2012;27:1179–83.

Article  Google Scholar 

Grifo JA, Noyes N. Delivery rate using cryopreserved oocytes is comparable to conventional in vitro fertilization using fresh oocytes: potential fertility preservation for female cancer patients. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:391–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, Mullin C, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Retrospective analysis of outcomes following transfer of previously cryopreserved oocytes, pronuclear zygotes and supernumerary blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2011;23:118–23.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goldman KN, Noyes NL, Knopman JM, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Oocyte efficiency: does live birth rate differ when analyzing cryopreserved and fresh oocytes on a per-oocyte basis? Fertil Steril. 2013;100:712–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goldman KN, Kramer Y, Hodes-Wertz B, Noyes N, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Long-term cryopreservation of human oocytes does not increase embryonic aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:662–8.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cascante SD, Blakemore JK, DeVore S, Hodes-Wertz B, Fino ME, Berkeley AS, Parra CM, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Fifteen years of autologous oocyte thaw outcomes from a large university-based fertility center. Fertil Steril. 2022;118(1):158–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scott RT Jr, Ferry K, Su J, Tao X, Scott K, Treff NR. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:870–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gupta P, Banker M, Patel P, Joshi B. A study of recipient related predictors of success in oocyte donation program. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2012;5(3):252–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harton GL, Munne S, Surrey M, et al. Diminished effect of maternal age on implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis with array comparative genomic hybridization. Fertil Steril. 2013;100:1695–703.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yaron Y, Botchan A, Amit A, Kogosowski A, Yovel I, Lessing JB. Endometrial receptivity: the age-related decline in pregnancy rates and the effect of ovarian function. Fertil Steril. 1993;60(2):314–8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soares SR, Troncoso C, Bosch E, Serra V, Simón C, Remohí J, Pellicer A. Age and uterine receptiveness: predicting the outcome of oocyte donation cycles. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90(7):4399–404.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhao J, Huang B, Li N, Wang X, Xu B, Li Y. Relationship between advanced maternal age and decline of endometrial receptivity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Aging (Albany NY). 2023b;15(7):2460–72. https://doi.org/10.18632/aging.204555.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abdalla HI, Wren ME, Thomas A, Korea L. Age of the uterus does not affect pregnancy or implantation rates; a study of egg donation in women of different ages sharing oocytes from the same donor. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(4):827–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Irani M, Zaninovic N, Rosenwaks Z, Xu K. Does maternal age at retrieval influence the implantation potential of euploid blastocysts? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;220(4):379.e1-379.e7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sekhon L, Whitehouse M, Sandler B, Grunfeld L, Copperman A. Using new technology to ask an old question: does the uterus age? Fertil Steril. 2015;4(3):E150–E151.

Chemerinski A, Garcia de Paredes J, Blackledge K, Douglas NC, Morelli SS. Mechanisms of endometrial aging: lessons from natural conceptions and assisted reproductive technology cycles. Front Physiol. 2024;15:1332946. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2024.1332946.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li J, Wang Y, Tang R, Peng Y, Wang Y, Liu B, et al. Changes in ultrasound uterine morphology and endometrial thickness during ovarian aging and possible associated factors: findings from a prospective study. Menopause. 2020;27(7):794–800. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001531.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tomari H, Kawamura T, Asanoma K, Egashira K, Kawamura K, Honjo K, et al. Contribution of senescence in human endometrial stromal cells during proliferative phase to embryo receptivity†. Biol Reprod. 2020;103(1):104–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/biolre/ioaa044.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lv H, Zhao G, Jiang P, Wang H, Wang Z, Yao S, et al. Deciphering the endometrial niche of human thin endometrium at single-cell resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022;119(8):e2115912119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2115912119.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Devesa-Peiro A, Sebastian-Leon P, Parraga-Leo A, Pellicer A, Diaz-Gimeno P. Breaking the ageing paradigm in endometrium: endometrial gene expression related to cilia and ageing hallmarks in women over 35 years. Hum Reprod. 2022;37(4):762–76. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deac010.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kalluru S, Cascante SD, Blakemore JK, Grifo JA. How many frozen eggs do I need to get one euploid embryo? An analysis of 450 autologous oocyte thaw patients. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(4 (Supplement)):E37.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pecoriello J, Kelley AG, Cascante SD, Blakemore JK. Beyond the egg: sperm source and sperm age do not impact cumulative live birth rates (CLBR) in oocyte cryopreservation (OC) Patients (PTS). Fertil Steril. 2023;120(4 (Supplement)):E198.

Article  Google Scholar 

Sanders KD, Silvestri G, Gordon T, Griffin DK. Analysis of IVF live birth outcomes with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A): UK Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority data collection 2016–2018. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(12):3277–85.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Scott RTJ, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013;100(3):697–703.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liss J, Pastuszek E, Pukszta S, Hoffmann E, Kuczynski W, Lukaszuk A, et al. Effect of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic testing on live birth ratio. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2018;30(12):1720–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sui YL, Lei CX, Ye JF, Fu J, Zhang S, Li L, et al. In vitro fertilization with single-nucleotide polymorphism microarray-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy significantly improves clinical outcomes in infertile women with recurrent pregnancy loss: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Dev Med. 2020;4(1):32–41.

Article  Google Scholar 

Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. asrm@asrm.org. Evidence Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(1):36–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.024.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pregnancy at age 35 years or older: ACOG Obstetric Care Consensus No. 11. Obstet Gynecol. 2022;140(2):348–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004873

Fuchs F, Monet B, Ducruet T, Chaillet N, Audibert F. Effect of maternal age on the risk of preterm birth: a large cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(1):e0191002. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191002.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Guarga Montori M, Álvarez Martínez A, Luna Álvarez C, Abadía Cuchí N, Mateo Alcalá P, Ruiz-Martínez S. Advanced maternal age and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;60(1):119–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2020.11.018.

Article  CAS  PubMed