Yu, Z. et al. Rational solvent molecule tuning for high-performance lithium metal battery electrolytes. Nat. Energy 7, 94–106 (2022).
He, X. et al. The passivity of lithium electrodes in liquid electrolytes for secondary batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1036–1052 (2021).
Fan, L. Z., He, H. & Nan, C. W. Tailoring inorganic−polymer composites for the mass production of solid-state batteries. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6, 1003–1019 (2021).
Lu, Z. et al. Crowning metal ions by supramolecularization as a general remedy toward a dendrite-free alkali-metal battery. Adv. Mater. 33, e2101745 (2021).
Li, S. et al. A robust all-organic protective layer towards ultrahigh-rate and large-capacity Li metal anodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 17, 613–621 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Koerver, R. et al. Capacity fade in solid-state batteries: interphase formation and chemomechanical processes in nickel–rich layered oxide cathodes and lithium thiophosphate solid electrolytes. Chem. Mater. 29, 5574–5582 (2017).
Wang, Y. et al. 5V–class sulfurized spinel cathode stable in sulfide all-solid-state batteries. Nano Energy 90, 106589 (2021).
Nagao, M. et al. Reaction mechanism of all-solid-state lithium–sulfur battery with two-dimensional mesoporous carbon electrodes. J. Power Sources 243, 60–64 (2013).
Chinnam, P. R. et al. Unlocking failure mechanisms and improvement of practical Li–S pouch cells through in operando pressure study. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2103048 (2021).
Bi, X. et al. Understanding the role of lithium iodide in lithium−oxygen batteries. Adv. Mater. 34, 2106148 (2022).
Liu, S. et al. Super long-cycling all-solid-state battery with thin Li6PS5Cl-based electrolyte. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2200660 (2022).
Kato, Y. et al. High-power all-solid-state batteries using sulfide superionic conductors. Nat. Energy 1, 16030 (2016).
Seino, Y., Ota, T., Takada, K., Hayashi, A. & Tatsumisago, M. A sulphide lithium super ion conductor is superior to liquid ion conductors for use in rechargeable batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 7, 627–631 (2014).
Zhou, L., Assoud, A., Zhang, Q., Wu, X. & Nazar, L. F. New family of argyrodite thioantimonate lithium superionic conductors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 19002–19013 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, S. et al. Lithium argyrodite as solid electrolyte and cathode precursor for solid‐state batteries with long cycle life. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2101370 (2021).
Doux, J. M. et al. Pressure effects on sulfide electrolytes for all solid-state batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 8, 5049–5055 (2020).
Su, Y. et al. A more stable lithium anode by mechanical constriction for solid state batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 13, 908–916 (2020).
Ye, L. et al. Toward higher voltage solid–state batteries by metastability and kinetic stability design. Adv. Energy Mater. 10, 2001569 (2020). This paper provides an insight on how mechanical constrictions can lead to mechanically induced metastability and how mechanical constrictions can control decomposition kinetics to reach unparalleled voltages and more stable interfaces.
Chen, Y. et al. Li metal deposition and stripping in a solid-state battery via Coble creep. Nature 578, 251–255 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Wang, H. et al. Linking the defects to the formation and growth of Li dendrite in all-solid-state batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2102148 (2021).
Liang, J. et al. Site-occupation-tuned superionic LixScCl3+x halide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 7012–7022 (2020).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Dixit, M. et al. The role of isostatic pressing in large-scale production of solid-state batteries. ACS Energy Lett. 7, 3936–3946 (2022).
Tian, H. K. & Qi, Y. Simulation of the effect of contact area Loss in all-solid-state Li-ion batteries. J. Electrochem. Soc. 164, E3512–E3521 (2017). This study computes the contact area variation for all-solid-state Li-ion batteries during cycling and provides the optimal pressure value to recover the capacity drop due to contact area loss.
Persson, B. N. J. Contact mechanics for randomly rough surfaces. Surf. Sci. Rep. 61, 201–227 (2006).
Sakuda, A., Hayashi, A. & Tatsumisago, M. Sulfide solid electrolyte with favorable mechanical property for all-solid-state lithium battery. Sci. Rep. 3, 2261 (2013).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Matsuda, S. & Nakamura, K. Effect of confining pressure on the Li/Li7La3Zr2O12 interface during Li dissolution/deposition cycles. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 3, 11113–11118 (2020).
Famprikis, T., Canepa, P., Dawson, J. A., Islam, M. S. & Masquelier, C. Fundamentals of inorganic solid-state electrolytes for batteries. Nat. Mater. 18, 1278–1291 (2019).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Zhang, W. et al. Electrochemical expansion during cycling: monitoring the pressure changes in operating solid-state lithium batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 5, 9929–9936 (2017).
Hao, F., Han, F., Liang, Y., Wang, C. & Yao, Y. Architectural design and fabrication approaches for solid-state batteries. MRS Bull. 43, 775–781 (2018).
Janek, J. & Zeier, W. G. A solid future for battery development. Nat. Energy 1, 16141 (2016).
Liu, X. et al. Electrochemo-mechanical effects on structural integrity of Ni-rich cathodes with different microstructures in all solid-state batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003583 (2021).
Yan, H. et al. How does the creep stress regulate void formation at the lithium–solid electrolyte interface during stripping? Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2102283 (2022). This paper develops a general electro-chemomechanical model to reveal the mechanisms of void formation during Li stripping and explores the competitive influences between stack pressure and current density on void formation.
Zhang, R. et al. Compositionally complex doping for zero-strain zero-cobalt layered cathodes. Nature 610, 67–73 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Cronau, M., Szabo, M., König, C., Wassermann, T. B. & Roling, B. How to measure a reliable ionic conductivity? The stack pressure dilemma of microcrystalline sulfide-based solid electrolytes. ACS Energy Lett. 6, 3072–3077 (2021). This study reports the differences among different types of SSE materials (amorphous electrolytes, glass ceramic electrolytes and microcrystalline electrolytes) with regard to the influences of both fabrication pressure and stack pressure on the ionic conductivity.
Il’ina, E. A., Andreev, O. L., Antonov, B. D. & Batalov, N. N. Morphology and transport properties of the solid electrolyte Li7La3Zr2O12 prepared by the solid-state and citrate–nitrate methods. J. Power Sources 201, 169–173 (2012).
Raj, V. et al. Direct correlation between void formation and lithium dendrite growth in solid-state electrolytes with interlayers. Nat. Mater. 21, 1050–1056 (2022).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kang, H. et al. Geometric and electrochemical characteristics of LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 electrode with different calendering conditions. Electrochim. Acta 232, 431–438 (2017).
Ebner, M., Geldmacher, F., Marone, F., Stampanoni, M. & Wood, V. X-ray tomography of porous, transition metal oxide based lithium ion battery electrodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 3, 845–850 (2013).
Gao, X. et al. Solid-state lithium battery cathodes operating at low pressures. Joule 6, 636–646 (2022).
Li, W. J., Hirayama, M., Suzuki, K. & Kanno, R. Fabrication and all solid-state battery performance of TiS2/Li10GeP2S12 composite electrodes. Mater. Trans. 57, 549–552 (2016).
Bae Song, Y. et al. Electrochemo-mechanical effects as a critical design factor for all-solid-state batteries. Curr. Opin. Solid. State Mater. Sci. 26, 100977 (2022).
Kuppan, S., Xu, Y., Liu, Y. & Chen, G. Phase transformation mechanism in lithium manganese nickel oxide revealed by single-crystal hard X-ray microscopy. Nat. Commun. 8, 14309 (2017).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yamamoto, M., Terauchi, Y., Sakuda, A., Kato, A. & Takahashi, M. Effects of volume variations under different compressive pressures on the performance and microstructure of all-solid-state batteries. J. Power Sources 473, 228595 (2020).
Comments (0)