Tiitinen A, Hydén-Granskog C, Gissler M. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? The value of cryopreservation on cumulative pregnancy rates per single oocyte retrieval should not be forgotten. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2439–41.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maheshwari A, McLernon D, Bhattacharya S. Cumulative live birth rate: time for a consensus? Hum Reprod. 2015;30(12):2703–7.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scaravelli G, Levi-Setti PE, Livi C, La Sala G, Ubaldi FM, Greco E, et al. Correc- tion to: contribution of cryopreservation to the cumulative live birth rate: a large multicentric cycle-based data analysis from the Italian National Regis- try. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36:2297.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zacà C, Bazzocchi A, Pennetta F, Bonu MA, Coticchio G, Borini A. Cumula- tive live birth rate in freeze-all cycles is comparable to that of a conventional embryo transfer policy at the cleavage stage but superior at the blastocyst stage. Fertil Steril. 2018;110:703–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Germond M, Urner F, Chanson A, Primi MP, Wirthner D, Senn A. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction?: The cumulated singleton/twin delivery rates per oocyte pick-up: the CUSIDERA and CUTWIDERA. Hum Reprod. 2004;11:2442–4.

Article  Google Scholar 

Zacà C, Coticchio G, Tarozzi N, Nadalini M, Lagalla C, Garolla A, et al. Sperm count affects cumulative birth rate of assisted reproduction cycles in relation to ovarian response. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020;37:1653–9.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

de Mouzon J, Goossens V, Bhattacharya S, Castilla JA, Ferraretti AP, Korsak V, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2006: results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:1851–62.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rienzi L, Gracia C, Maggiulli R, LaBarbera AR, Kaser DJ, Ubaldi FM, et al. Oocyte, embryo and blastocyst cryopreservation in ART: systematic review and meta-analysis comparing slow-freezing versus vitrification to produce evidence for the development of global guidance. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23:139–55.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Law 19 February 2004 No. 40 https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2004/02/24/004G0062/sg

Borini A, Lagalla C, Bonu MA, Bianchi V, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Cumulative pregnancy rates resulting from the use of fresh and frozen oocytes: 7 years’ experience. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12(4):481–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Borini A, Gambardella A, Bonu MA, Dal PL, Sciajno R, Bianchi L, et al. Comparison of IVF and ICSI when only few oocytes are available for insemination. Reprod BioMed Online. 2009;19:270–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dal Prato L, Borini A, Cattoli M, Bonu MA, Sciajno R, Flamigni C. Endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer with or without pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Fertil Steril. 2002;77(5):956–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Scaravelli G, Zacà C, Levi Setti PE, Livi C, Ubaldi FM, Villani MT, Greco E, Coccia ME, Revelli A, Ricci G, Fusi F, Vigiliano V, De Luca R, Bolli S, Borini A. Fertilization rate as a novel indicator for cumulative live birth rate: a multicenter retrospective cohort study of 9,394 complete in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2021;116(3):766–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bartolacci A, Intra G, Coticchio G, dell'Aquila M, Patria G, Borini A. Does morphological assessment predict oocyte developmental competence? A systematic review and proposed score. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(1):3–17.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

European Court of Human Rights, 27.8.2015, ref., Parrillo v. Italy. Application No. 46470/11. Judgment issued on 27th August 2015, in www.echr.coe.int

European Court of Human Rights. Evans v. the United Kingdom. Application No. 6339/05. Judgment issued on 10th April 2007. Available at: https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/ eng#

Saket Z, Källén K, Lundin K, Magnusson Å, Bergh C. Cumulative live birth rate after IVF: trend over time and the impact of blastocyst culture and vitrification. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(3):hoab021.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sunkara SK, Rittenberg V, Raine-Fenning N, Bhattacharya S, Zamora J, Coomarasamy A. Association between the number of eggs and live birth in IVF treatment: an analysis of 400 135 treatment cycles. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(7):1768–74.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Polyzos NP, Drakopoulos P, Parra J, Pellicer A, Santos-Ribeiro S, Tournaye H, Bosch E, Garcia-Velasco J. Cumulative live birth rates according to the number of oocytes retrieved after the first ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a multicenter multinational analysis including ∼15,000 women. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(4):661–670.e1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Datta AK, Campbell S, Felix N, Singh JSH, Nargund G. Oocyte or embryo number needed to optimize live birth and cumulative live birth rates in mild stimulation IVF cycles. Reprod Biomed Online. 2021;43(2):223–32.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fanton M, Cho JH, Baker VL, Loewke K. A higher number of oocytes retrieved is associated with an increase in fertilized oocytes, blastocysts, and cumulative live birth rates. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(5):762–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.01.001.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hill MJ, Richter KS, Heitmann RJ, Lewis TD, DeCherney AH, Graham JR, Widra E, Levy MJ. Number of supernumerary vitrified blastocysts is positively correlated with implantation and live birth in single-blastocyst embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2013;99(6):1631–6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar