A total of 41 patients with recurrent cervical HSIL after surgery for precancerous lesions were studied retrospectively. Patients underwent ALA-PDT or surgery and were followed up at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months and then every six months after that. Clinical data were collected and the efficacy and safety of the two treatment methods were compared.

Of the 41 patients with recurrent cervical HSIL after conization, 15 cases received ALA-PDT and 26 received surgery. At the six-month follow-up, the lesions’ complete remission (CR) rate was 93.33 % in ALA-PDT group and 88.46% in the surgery group. The human papillomavirus (HPV) clearance rates were 66.67% and 73.08%, respectively. No significant differences concerning the lesions’ CR rate and the HPV clearance rate were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). At the twelve-month follow-up, the HPV clearance rates were 80.00% and 91.67%. No significant differences concerning the HPV clearance rate were observed between the two groups (P>0.05). In the surgery group, the HPV clearance rate and the lesions’ CR rate were lower in patients over 45 years of age (25.00% vs. 81.82%, P=0.031; 50.00% vs. 95.45%, P=0.052). During the follow-up, there was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between the two groups (P>0.05). In addition, none of the patients progressed. In women treated with ALA-PDT, there was no vaginal bleeding, and no harmful effects on the cervical organizational structure or functions compared to the surgery group, and two women delivered successfully after ALA-PDT treatment.