Holick MF. Vitamin D and bone health. J Nutr. 1996;126(4 Suppl):1159s-s1164. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/126.suppl_4.1159S.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Feldman D, Krishnan AV, Swami S, Giovannucci E, Feldman BJ. The role of vitamin D in reducing cancer risk and progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(5):342–57. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3691.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dimitrov V, Salehi-Tabar R, An BS, White JH. Non-classical mechanisms of transcriptional regulation by the vitamin D receptor: insights into calcium homeostasis, immune system regulation and cancer chemoprevention. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2014;144(Pt A):74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.07.012.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bikle D. Nonclassic actions of vitamin D. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1454.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Zhu J, DeLuca HF. Where is the vitamin D receptor? Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012;523(1):123–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2012.04.001.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hewison M, Burke F, Evans KN, et al. Extra-renal 25-hydroxyvitamin D3–1alpha-hydroxylase in human health and disease. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2007;103(3–5):316–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2006.12.078.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kahwati LC, LeBlanc E, Weber RP, et al. Screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2021;325(14):1443–63. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.26498.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bouillon R, Marcocci C, Carmeliet G, et al. Skeletal and extraskeletal actions of vitamin D: current evidence and outstanding questions. Endocr Rev. 2019;40(4):1109–51. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2018-00126.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liu D, Meng X, Tian Q, et al. Vitamin D and multiple health outcomes: an umbrella review of observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and mendelian randomization studies. Adv Nutr. 2022;13(4):1044–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/advances/nmab142.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bouillon R, Manousaki D, Rosen C, Trajanoska K, Rivadeneira F, Richards JB. The health effects of vitamin D supplementation: evidence from human studies. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2022;18(2):96–110. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-021-00593-z.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Munns CF, Shaw N, Kiely M, et al. Global consensus recommendations on prevention and management of nutritional rickets. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101(2):394–415. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-2175.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sanderson E, Glymour MM, Holmes MV, et al. Mendelian randomization. Nat Rev Methods Prim. 2022;2(1):6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00092-5.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wade KH, Yarmolinsky J, Giovannucci E, et al. Applying Mendelian randomization to appraise causality in relationships between nutrition and cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2022;33(5):631–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-022-01562-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sallinen RJ, Dethlefsen O, Ruotsalainen S, et al. Genetic risk score for serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration helps to guide personalized vitamin D supplementation in healthy finnish adults. J Nutr. 2021;151(2):281–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/jn/nxaa391.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang TJ, Zhang F, Richards JB, et al. Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study. Lancet. 2010;376(9736):180–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60588-0.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jiang X, O’Reilly PF, Aschard H, et al. Genome-wide association study in 79,366 European-ancestry individuals informs the genetic architecture of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):260. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02662-2.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Manousaki D, Mitchell R, Dudding T, et al. Genome-wide association study for vitamin D levels reveals 69 independent loci. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(3):327–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.01.017.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Revez JA, Lin T, Qiao Z, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies 143 loci associated with 25 hydroxyvitamin D concentration. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):1647. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15421-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zheng JS, Luan J, Sofianopoulou E, et al. The association between circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D metabolites and type 2 diabetes in European populations: a meta-analysis and Mendelian randomisation analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17(10): e1003394. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003394.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Manousaki D, Dudding T, Haworth S, et al. Low-frequency synonymous coding variation in CYP2R1 has large effects on vitamin D levels and risk of multiple sclerosis. Am J Hum Genet. 2017;101(2):227–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.06.014.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Meng X, Li X, Timofeeva MN, et al. Phenome-wide Mendelian-randomization study of genetically determined vitamin D on multiple health outcomes using the UK Biobank study. Int J Epidemiol. 2019;48(5):1425–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyz182.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jiang X, Kiel DP, Kraft P. The genetics of vitamin D. Bone. 2019;126:59–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2018.10.006.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Butler-Laporte G, Richards JB. Mendelian randomisation and vitamin D: the importance of model assumptions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(1):14–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00342-4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith GD. Mendelian randomisation and vitamin D: the importance of model assumptions. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00345-x.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burgess S. Violation of the constant genetic effect assumption can result in biased estimates for non-linear Mendelian randomization. Hum Hered. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1159/000531659.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372: n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fang A, Zhao Y, Yang P, Zhang X, Giovannucci E. Health Effects of Vitamin D: Evidence from Mendelian Randomization studies. protocols.io, protocols.io. 2022. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.eq2ly7nzmlx9/v1. Accessed October 17, 2022.

Trummer O, Langsenlehner U, Krenn-Pilko S, et al. Vitamin D and prostate cancer prognosis: a Mendelian randomization study. World J Urol. 2016;34(4):607–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1646-9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kueider AM, Tanaka T, An Y, et al. State- and trait-dependent associations of vitamin-D with brain function during aging. Neurobiol Aging. 2016;39:38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2015.11.002.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leong A, Rehman W, Dastani Z, et al. The causal effect of vitamin D binding protein (DBP) levels on calcemic and cardiometabolic diseases: a Mendelian randomization study. PLoS Med. 2014;11(10): e1001751. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001751.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang H, Wang T, Han Z, et al. Impact of vitamin D binding protein levels on Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization study. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;74(3):991–8. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-191051.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Burgess S, Wood AM, Butterworth AS. Mendelian randomisation and vitamin D: the importance of model assumptions - Authors’ reply. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2023;11(1):15–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-8587(22)00344-8.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boef AG, Dekkers OM, le Cessie S. Mendelian randomization studies: a review of the approaches used and the quality of reporting. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):496–511. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyv071.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Skrivankova VW, Richmond RC, Woolf BAR, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology using mendelian randomization: the STROBE-MR statement. JAMA. 2021;326(16):1614–21. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.18236.

Article  PubMed