Muraki S, Oka H, Akune T, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, Saika A, Suzuki T, Yoshida H, Ishibashi H, Yamamoto S, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H, Yoshimura N (2009) Prevalence of radiographic lumbar spondylosis and its association with low back pain in elderly subjects of population-based cohorts: the ROAD study. Ann Rheum Dis 68(9):1401–1406. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.087296
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
Clark S, Horton R (2018) Low back pain: a major global challenge. The Lancet 391(10137):2302–2302
Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ (2015) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion–systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 29(5):705–711. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2015.1036838
Rao PJ, Maharaj MM, Phan K, Abeygunasekara ML, Mobbs RJ (2015) Indirect foraminal decompression after anteriorlumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique. Spine J 15(5):817–824
Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, Liu JC (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine SPI 7(4):379–386. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI-07/10/379
Divi SN, Schroeder GD, Goyal DK, Radcliff KE, Galetta MS, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Kurd MF, Rihn JA, Kaye ID, Woods BR, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK (2019) Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease. Spine J 19(12):1960–1968
Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee SH, Jung B, Choi YG, Jeon SH, Lee HY (2009) Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Techn 22(2):114–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318169bff5
Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R (2017) A meta-analysis comparing ALIF PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci 44:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.013
Thompsom P, Adogwa O, Knott KT, Toche U, Huang K, Cheng JS, Isaacs RE (2013) Outcomes after ALIF versus TLIF for treatment of symptomatic L5–S1 Spondylolisthesis: a prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study. Spine J 13:s159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.402
Min J, Jang J, Lee S (2007) Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine SPI 2007 7(1):21–26. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI-07/07/021
Norwegian registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) Annual report 2017 Tore K Solberg, Lena Ringstad olsen Universtitetssykehuset I Nord Norge (UNN) 2SKDE (2018) https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/sites/default/files/30_arsrapport_2017_ryggkirurgi_1.pdf, Accessed 17 July 2022
Alhaug OK, Kaur S, Dolatowski F, Småstuen MC, Solberg TK, Lønne G (2022) Accuracy and agreement of national spine register data for 474 patients compared to corresponding electronic patient records. Eur Spine J 31(3):801–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07093-8
Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The oswestry disability index. Spine. 2940–2952
Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaption of the Norwegian versions of the roland-morris disability questionnaire and the oswestry disability index. J Rehabil Med 35:241–247
Article PubMed CAS Google Scholar
McCaffery M (1989) Pain, clinical manual for nursing practice. Mosby
EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9
Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, Hancock MJ (2010) Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 63(7):760–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009
Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Kroff M et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90–94
Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kröger H, Andrade J, Jiménez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(18):E648–E663. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da
Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46(3):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786
Wang Y, Cai H, Li C, Jiang Z, Wang L, Song J, Xia J (2013) Optimal caliper width for propensity score matching of three treatment groups: a Monte Carlo study. PLoS ONE 8(12):e81045. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081045
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Solberg TK, Sørlie A, Sjaavik K, Nygaard ØP, Ingebrigtsen T (2011) Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop 82(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.548024
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kaur S, Alhaug OK, Dolatowski FC et al (2023) Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24:164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147(8):573–577 (PMID: 17938396)
Kim MK, Lee SH, Kim ES et al (2011) The impact of sagittal balance on clinical results after posterior interbody fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-69
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y, Abul K, Boissiére L, Haddad S, Obeid I, Kleinstück F, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ, Acaroğlu E, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study Group (2017) Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Neurosurg Focus 43(6):E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17498
Bari TJ, Heegaard M, Bech-Azeddine R, Dahl B, Gehrchen M (2021) Lordosis distribution index in short-segment lumbar spine fusion: Can ideal lordosis reduce revision surgery and iatrogenic deformity? Neurospine. 18(3):543–553. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040744.372
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10(4):314–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000239
Article PubMed PubMed Central CAS Google Scholar
Charles Malveaux WMS, Sharan AD (2011) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review of the current literature. Sem Spine Surg 23(4):266–274. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2011.05.008
Zheng G, Wang C, Wang T, Hu W, Ji Q, Hu F, Li J, Chaudhary SK, Song K, Song D, Zhang Z, Hao Y, Wang Y, Li J, Zheng Q, Zhang X, Wang Y (2020) Relationship between postoperative lordosis distribution index and adjacent segment disease following L4–S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 15(1):129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01630-9
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lenz M, Mohamud K, Bredow J, Oikonomidis S, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ (2022) Comparison of different approaches in lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Spine J. 16(1):141–149. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0405
Crandall DG, Revella J (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(20):2126–2133. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b612db
Faundez AA, Schwender JD, Safriel Y, Gilbert TJ, Mehbod AA, Denis F, Transfeldt EE, Wroblewski JM (2009) Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 8(2):203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0845-0
Kim JS, Lee KY, Lee SH, Lee HY (2010) Which lumbar interbody fusion technique is better in terms of level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis? J Neurosurg Spine 12(2):171–177. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09272
Dorward IG, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, O’Leary PT, Stoker GE, Pahys JM, Kang MM, Sides BA, Koester LA (2013) Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila 1976). 38(12):E755–E762. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828d6ca3
Upadhyayula PS, Curtis EI, Yue JK, Sidhu N, Ciacci JD (2018) Anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: perioperative risk factors and 30-day outcomes. Int J Spine Surg. 12(5):533–542. https://doi.org/10.14444/5065
Comments (0)