Long-term comparison of anterior (ALIF) versus transforaminal (TLIF) lumbar interbody fusion: a propensity score-matched register-based study

Muraki S, Oka H, Akune T, Mabuchi A, En-Yo Y, Yoshida M, Saika A, Suzuki T, Yoshida H, Ishibashi H, Yamamoto S, Nakamura K, Kawaguchi H, Yoshimura N (2009) Prevalence of radiographic lumbar spondylosis and its association with low back pain in elderly subjects of population-based cohorts: the ROAD study. Ann Rheum Dis 68(9):1401–1406. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.2007.087296

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Clark S, Horton R (2018) Low back pain: a major global challenge. The Lancet 391(10137):2302–2302

Article  Google Scholar 

Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ (2015) Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 1(1):2–18. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2414-469X.2015.10.05

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ (2015) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion–systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 29(5):705–711. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2015.1036838

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rao PJ, Maharaj MM, Phan K, Abeygunasekara ML, Mobbs RJ (2015) Indirect foraminal decompression after anteriorlumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique. Spine J 15(5):817–824

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, Liu JC (2007) Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine SPI 7(4):379–386. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI-07/10/379

Article  Google Scholar 

Divi SN, Schroeder GD, Goyal DK, Radcliff KE, Galetta MS, Hilibrand AS, Anderson DG, Kurd MF, Rihn JA, Kaye ID, Woods BR, Vaccaro AR, Kepler CK (2019) Fusion technique does not affect short-term patient-reported outcomes for lumbar degenerative disease. Spine J 19(12):1960–1968

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim JS, Kang BU, Lee SH, Jung B, Choi YG, Jeon SH, Lee HY (2009) Mini-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion augmented by percutaneous pedicle screw fixation: a comparison of surgical outcomes in adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. J Spinal Disord Techn 22(2):114–121. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318169bff5

Article  Google Scholar 

Teng I, Han J, Phan K, Mobbs R (2017) A meta-analysis comparing ALIF PLIF, TLIF and LLIF. J Clin Neurosci 44:11–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2017.06.013

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thompsom P, Adogwa O, Knott KT, Toche U, Huang K, Cheng JS, Isaacs RE (2013) Outcomes after ALIF versus TLIF for treatment of symptomatic L5–S1 Spondylolisthesis: a prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study. Spine J 13:s159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2013.07.402

Article  Google Scholar 

Min J, Jang J, Lee S (2007) Comparison of anterior- and posterior-approach instrumented lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine SPI 2007 7(1):21–26. https://doi.org/10.3171/SPI-07/07/021

Article  Google Scholar 

Norwegian registry for Spine Surgery (NORspine) Annual report 2017 Tore K Solberg, Lena Ringstad olsen Universtitetssykehuset I Nord Norge (UNN) 2SKDE (2018) https://www.kvalitetsregistre.no/sites/default/files/30_arsrapport_2017_ryggkirurgi_1.pdf, Accessed 17 July 2022

Alhaug OK, Kaur S, Dolatowski F, Småstuen MC, Solberg TK, Lønne G (2022) Accuracy and agreement of national spine register data for 474 patients compared to corresponding electronic patient records. Eur Spine J 31(3):801–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-07093-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The oswestry disability index. Spine. 2940–2952

Grotle M, Brox JI, Vøllestad NK (2003) Cross-cultural adaption of the Norwegian versions of the roland-morris disability questionnaire and the oswestry disability index. J Rehabil Med 35:241–247

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

McCaffery M (1989) Pain, clinical manual for nursing practice. Mosby

EuroQol Group (1990) EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy 16(3):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9

Article  Google Scholar 

Kamper SJ, Ostelo RWJG, Knol DL, Maher CG, de Vet HCW, Hancock MJ (2010) Global Perceived Effect scales provided reliable assessments of health transition in people with musculoskeletal disorders, but ratings are strongly influenced by current status. J Clin Epidemiol 63(7):760–766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.09.009

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Kroff M et al (2008) Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:90–94

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aalto TJ, Malmivaara A, Kovacs F, Herno A, Alen M, Salmi L, Kröger H, Andrade J, Jiménez R, Tapaninaho A, Turunen V, Savolainen S, Airaksinen O (2006) Preoperative predictors for postoperative clinical outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(18):E648–E663. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000231727.88477.da

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Austin PC (2011) An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivar Behav Res 46(3):399–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.568786

Article  Google Scholar 

Wang Y, Cai H, Li C, Jiang Z, Wang L, Song J, Xia J (2013) Optimal caliper width for propensity score matching of three treatment groups: a Monte Carlo study. PLoS ONE 8(12):e81045. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081045

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Solberg TK, Sørlie A, Sjaavik K, Nygaard ØP, Ingebrigtsen T (2011) Would loss to follow-up bias the outcome evaluation of patients operated for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine? Acta Orthop 82(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2010.548024

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kaur S, Alhaug OK, Dolatowski FC et al (2023) Characteristics and outcomes of patients who did not respond to a national spine surgery registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24:164. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06267-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP (2007) The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med 147(8):573–577 (PMID: 17938396)

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim MK, Lee SH, Kim ES et al (2011) The impact of sagittal balance on clinical results after posterior interbody fusion for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis: a pilot study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 12:69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-69

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Yavuz Y, Abul K, Boissiére L, Haddad S, Obeid I, Kleinstück F, Sánchez Pérez-Grueso FJ, Acaroğlu E, Mannion AF, Pellise F, Alanay A, European Spine Study Group (2017) Relative lumbar lordosis and lordosis distribution index: individualized pelvic incidence-based proportional parameters that quantify lumbar lordosis more precisely than the concept of pelvic incidence minus lumbar lordosis. Neurosurg Focus 43(6):E5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17498

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bari TJ, Heegaard M, Bech-Azeddine R, Dahl B, Gehrchen M (2021) Lordosis distribution index in short-segment lumbar spine fusion: Can ideal lordosis reduce revision surgery and iatrogenic deformity? Neurospine. 18(3):543–553. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2040744.372

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D (2001) Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J 10(4):314–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005860000239

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Charles Malveaux WMS, Sharan AD (2011) Adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion: a systematic review of the current literature. Sem Spine Surg 23(4):266–274. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semss.2011.05.008

Article  Google Scholar 

Zheng G, Wang C, Wang T, Hu W, Ji Q, Hu F, Li J, Chaudhary SK, Song K, Song D, Zhang Z, Hao Y, Wang Y, Li J, Zheng Q, Zhang X, Wang Y (2020) Relationship between postoperative lordosis distribution index and adjacent segment disease following L4–S1 posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Orthop Surg Res 15(1):129. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-020-01630-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lenz M, Mohamud K, Bredow J, Oikonomidis S, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ (2022) Comparison of different approaches in lumbosacral spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Spine J. 16(1):141–149. https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2020.0405

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crandall DG, Revella J (2009) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion as an adjunct to posterior instrumented correction of degenerative lumbar scoliosis: three year clinical and radiographic outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(20):2126–2133. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b612db

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faundez AA, Schwender JD, Safriel Y, Gilbert TJ, Mehbod AA, Denis F, Transfeldt EE, Wroblewski JM (2009) Clinical and radiological outcome of anterior-posterior fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective comparative study of 133 patients. Eur Spine J 8(2):203–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-008-0845-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim JS, Lee KY, Lee SH, Lee HY (2010) Which lumbar interbody fusion technique is better in terms of level for the treatment of unstable isthmic spondylolisthesis? J Neurosurg Spine 12(2):171–177. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.9.SPINE09272

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dorward IG, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, O’Leary PT, Stoker GE, Pahys JM, Kang MM, Sides BA, Koester LA (2013) Transforaminal versus anterior lumbar interbody fusion in long deformity constructs: a matched cohort analysis. Spine (Phila 1976). 38(12):E755–E762. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828d6ca3

Article  Google Scholar 

Upadhyayula PS, Curtis EI, Yue JK, Sidhu N, Ciacci JD (2018) Anterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: perioperative risk factors and 30-day outcomes. Int J Spine Surg. 12(5):533–542. https://doi.org/10.14444/5065

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Comments (0)

No login
gif