AI prediction of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy outcomes for ureteral stones by machine learning-based analysis with a variety of stone and patient characteristics

Drake T, Grivas N, Dabestani S, Knoll T, Lam T, Maclennan S, Petrik A, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Tuerk C, Yuan CY, Sarica K (2017) What are the benefits and harms of ureteroscopy compared with shock-wave lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteral stones a systematic review. Eur Urol 72:772–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2017.04.016

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Preminger GM (2006) Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy. Urol Res 34:108–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-005-0020-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chongruksut W, Lojanapiwat B, Ayudhya VC, Tawichasri C, Patumanond J, Paichitvichean S (2011) Prognostic factors for success in treating kidney stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Med Assoc Thai 94:331–336

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, D’A Honey RJ, Pace KT, (2010) Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi. Urol Res 38:307–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0295-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iwahashi Y, Iguchi T, Nishizawa S, Kikkawa K, Hara I (2018) Noncontrast computed tomography parameters for predicting shock wave lithotripsy outcome in upper urinary tract stone cases. Biomed Res Int 2018:9253952. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9253952

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee JY, Kim JH, Kang DH, Chung DY, Lee DH, Do Jung H, Kwon JK, Cho KS (2016) Stone heterogeneity index as the standard deviation of Hounsfield units: a novel predictor for shock-wave lithotripsy outcomes in ureter calculi. Sci Rep 6:23988. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep23988

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iguchi T, Nishizawa S, Iba A, Kikkawa K, Hara I (2017) Variation coefficient of stone density: a novel predictor of the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 31:384–390. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0719

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iguchi T, Nishizawa S, Kikkawa K, Hara I (2019) Ureteral wall volume at ureteral stone site is a critical predictor for shock wave lithotripsy outcomes: comparison with ureteral wall thickness and area. Urolithiasis 48(4):361–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-019-01154-w

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M, Knoll T (2016) EAU guidelines on interventional treatment for urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69:475–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.041

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, Pace KT, Pais VM Jr, Pearle MS, Preminger GM, Razvi H, Shah O, Matlaga BR (2016) Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART I. J Urol 196:1153–1160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mannil M, von Spiczak J, Hermanns T, Poyet C, Alkadhi H, Fankhauser CD (2018) Three-dimensional texture analysis with machine learning provides incremental predictive information for successful shock wave lithotripsy in patients with kidney stones. J Urol 200:829–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2018.04.059

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fisher A, Rudin C, Dominici F (2019) All models are wrong, but many are useful: learning a variable’s importance by studying an entire class of prediction models simultaneously. J Mach Learn Res 20:177

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burges CJ (1998) A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov 2:121–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009715923555

Article  Google Scholar 

Kumar Y, Koul A, Singla R, Ijaz MF (2023) Artificial intelligence in disease diagnosis: a systematic literature review, synthesizing framework and future research agenda. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 14:8459–8486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03612-z

Article  Google Scholar 

Yasui T, Iguchi M, Suzuki S, Kohri K (2008) Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan: national trends between 1965 and 2005. Urology 71:209–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.034

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Raudys SJ, Jain AK (1991) Small sample size effects in statistical pattern recognition: recommendations for practitioners. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13:252–264. https://doi.org/10.1109/34.75512

Article  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif