Persistent need for ongoing medical or surgical therapy despite UroLift

Authors Rahul Dutta Wake Forest School of Medicine Ethan L. Matz Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Nicholas A. Deebel Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Ryan P. Terlecki Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist DOI: https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8394 Keywords: prostatic urethral lift, urolift, treatment failure, bph, luts, surgical treatment Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Prostatic urethral lift (PUL) is a popular surgical option for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Prior five-year data from the multicenter L.I.F.T. trial suggested durability and a surgical retreatment rate of 13.6% at five years. We assessed the proportion of patients who had ongoing medical or surgical BPH management following PUL.

METHODS: With institutional review board approval, cases of PUL performed from 2015– 2020 at our academic institution were retrospectively reviewed for management of BPH following PUL.

RESULTS: A total of 209 men were identified, with followup available for 198 (95%). Mean age was 68.9 years and mean followup was 18.5 months. Mean prostate size was 43 g. Patients were discharged from recovery in 97% of cases, with 29% discharged with indwelling or intermittent catheterization. The rate of 30-day complications was 18%, with 89% graded Clavien I–II. Postoperatively, mean improvements in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) subscore were 5.3 and 1.1 points, respectively. Unplanned emergency room or clinic visits within 30 days of the procedure occurred in 14% and 17% of men, respectively, with 4% requiring hospital readmission. In followup, α-blockers and/or 5α-reductase inhibitors were continued or initiated postoperatively for 44% of men; 20% of men required repeat surgical intervention at a mean of 19.2 months (1.4–56.4), consisting of repeat PUL (30%), transurethral resection of prostate (28%), or thulium laser enucleation (18%). Overall, 53% of men needed medication and/or repeat surgery for BPH following PUL, and this was independent of age, race, prostate volume, intravesical prostate protrusion, baseline IPSS and QOL, stricture, number of implants used, or a history of urinary retention (p>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Most men undergoing PUL require ongoing medical and/or surgical management for BPH. Patients should be counselled as to the likelihood of failure as a unimodal therapy long-term.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

Dutta, R., Matz, E. L. ., Deebel, N. A. ., & Terlecki, R. P. . (2023). Persistent need for ongoing medical or surgical therapy despite UroLift: Data from an academic center. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 17(12), E408–11. https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8394

Issue Section

Original Research

License

You, the Author(s), assign your copyright in and to the Article to the Canadian Urological Association. This means that you may not, without the prior written permission of the CUA:

Post the Article on any Web site Translate or authorize a translation of the Article Copy or otherwise reproduce the Article, in any format, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so Copy or otherwise reproduce portions of the Article, including tables and figures, beyond what is permitted under Canadian copyright law, or authorize others to do so.

The CUA encourages use for non-commercial educational purposes and will not unreasonably deny any such permission request.

You retain your moral rights in and to the Article. This means that the CUA may not assert its copyright in such a way that would negatively reflect on your reputation or your right to be associated with the Article.

The CUA also requires you to warrant the following:

That you are the Author(s) and sole owner(s), that the Article is original and unpublished and that you have not previously assigned copyright or granted a licence to any other third party; That all individuals who have made a substantive contribution to the article are acknowledged; That the Article does not infringe any proprietary right of any third party and that you have received the permissions necessary to include the work of others in the Article; and That the Article does not libel or violate the privacy rights of any third party.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif