Predictors of HIV status disclosure among people living with HIV (PLHIV) in Ghana: the disclosure conundrum and its policy implications in resource limited settings

Socio-demographic and economic characteristics of respondents

Total of 181 participants were recruited for the study and successfully interviewed. Females dominated, representing 80% of the respondents while the average age was 47 ± 12.6. Half of the respondents were urban residents while over 90% were Christians of varying denominations; more than 70% of the respondents either did not have formal education or had at most primary or secondary education. Out of the 44% of respondents who were employed, 40% were in private business employment with an average monthly income below GHC 500 (approximately USD 44.00); 69% of them perceived themselves as poor and not having enough in terms of their economic status (see Table 1).

Table 1 Demographic and socio-economic characteristics of respondents

A little over 42% of respondents were in a  relationship and living with the partner. Over 90% of the respondents had at least a child with the average number of children per respondent being 3 ± 1.67. Approximately 83% of the respondents indicated none of their children was HIV positive; 42% of the respondents indicated their partner did not test positive for HIV and those whose partners were HIV positive, nearly 91% of them were on ART (see Table 1).

HIV status disclosure among PLHIV

Approximately 50% indicated they have not disclosed their HIV status to their partner while 50% of them said they did. Among respondents who did self-disclosure of their status, nearly 65% of them disclosed to non-family members followed by a partner (50%) and a sibling (29%). The least category of persons disclosures were made to are father (1.1%); aunt/uncle (3.3%); unspecific persons (5.5%); mother (17%), and children (18%) (see Fig. 1).

Fig. 1figure 1

Key outcome variables of interest (HIV status self-disclosure)

Predictors of HIV status disclosure

Significant association was found between HIV status disclosure to a partner and socio-demographic factors such as sex (p = 0.046) and marital status (p = 0.000). Other significant correlates are: being in private business (p = 0.022) and divorced due to HIV (p = 0.000). HIV status self-disclosure to other persons other than the partner was significantly correlated with monthly income (p = 0.022), being employed (p = 0.027), being divorced due to HIV (p = 0.017) and being knowledgeable of ART drugs side effects (p = 0.044) (see Table 2).

Table 2 Relationship between HIV status self-disclosure and background characteristics of respondents

HIV status disclosure to a partner was more likely to occur among married persons (Coef. = 1.25, p < 0.001, [95% CI 0.74, 1.76]), but not with non-partners (Coef. = −0.56, p < 0.001, [95% CI −0.044, 0−0.076]) (see Table 3).

Table 3 Bivariate probit regression on predictors of HIV status disclosure

Persons in lower income brackets were less likely to disclose their HIV status to their partners than those who earn higher monthly incomes (Coef. = −0.45, p < 0.01, [95% CI −0.93, 0.035]) (see Table 3). Higher monthly income earners were more likely to disclose their HIV status to others (non-partners) than low-income earners (Coef. = 0.51, p < 0.005, [95% CI 0.011, 1.00]) (see Table 3).

Persons engaged in private businesses were more likely to disclose their HIV status to their partners than other forms of employment endeavours (Coef. = 0.43, p < 0.005, [95% CI 0.012, 0.84). Persons who were employed were more likely to disclose their HIV status to others (non-partners) than the unemployed (Coef. = 0.43, p < 0.01, [95% CI −0.014, 0.88]) (see Table 3). Finally, persons who were divorced due to HIV were less likely to voluntarily disclose their HIV status to partners (Coef. = −1.34, p < 0.001, [95% CI −1.77, −0.90]) but more likely to disclose their status to others (non-partners) (Coef. = 0.49, p < 0.005, [95% CI 0.06, 0.91]) (see Table 3).

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif