A randomized controlled trial comparing infectious complications using mini perc with and without suction for renal stones less than 3 cm in size

EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis—GUIDELINES—Uroweb. Uroweb - European Association of Urology. https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis/chapter/guidelines

Ruhayel Y, Tepeler A, Dabestani S, MacLennan S, Petřík A, Sarica K et al (2017) Tract sizes in miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a systematic review from the European association of urology urolithiasis guidelines Panel. Eur Urol 72(2):220–235

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lopes T, Sangam K, Alken P, Barroilhet BS, Saussine C, Shi L et al (2011) The clinical research office of the endourological society percutaneous nephrolithotomy global study: tract dilation comparisons in 5537 patients. J Endourol 25(5):755–762

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kukreja RA (2018) Should mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MiniPNL/Miniperc) be the ideal tract for medium-sized renal calculi (15–30 mm)? World J Urol 36(2):285–291

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giusti G, Piccinelli A, Taverna G, Benetti A, Pasini L, Corinti M et al (2007) Miniperc? No, thank you! Eur Urol 51(3):810–814

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wu C, Hua LX, Zhang JZ, Zhou XR, Zhong W, Ni HD (2017) Comparison of renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever incidence between standard- and mini-tract percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 33(1):36–43

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zanetti SP, Boeri L, Gallioli A, Talso M, Montanari E (2017) Minimally invasive PCNL-MIP. Arch Esp Urol 70(1):226–234

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nagele U, Horstmann M, Sievert KD, Kuczyk MA, Walcher U, Hennenlotter J et al (2007) A newly designed amplatz sheath decreases intrapelvic irrigation pressure during mini-percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy: an in-vitro pressure-measurement and microscopic study. J Endourol 21(9):1113–1116

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mager R, Balzereit C, Gust K, Hüsch T, Herrmann T, Nagele U et al (2016) The hydrodynamic basis of the vacuum cleaner effect in continuous-flow PCNL instruments: an empiric approach and mathematical model. World J Urol 34(5):717–724

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng G, Zhu W, Lam W (2018) Miniaturised percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Its role in the treatment of urolithiasis and our experience. Asian J Urol 5(4):295–302

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alsmadi J, Fan J, Zhu W, Wen Z, Zeng G (2018) The influence of super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy on renal pelvic pressure in vivo. J Endourol 32(9):819–823

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shah K, Agrawal MS, Mishra DK (2017) Superperc: a new technique in minimally-invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Indian J Urol IJU J Urol Soc India 33(1):48–52

Google Scholar 

Seitz C, Desai M, Häcker A, Hakenberg OW, Liatsikos E, Nagele U et al (2012) Incidence, prevention, and management of complications following percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. Eur Urol 61(1):146–158

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Xu G, He Y, Zhao H, Jiang X, Feng G, Yang W et al (2016) Mini-nephroscope combined with pressure suction: an effective tool in MPCNL for intrarenal stones in patients with urinary tract infections. Urolithiasis 44(5):445–450

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lievore E, Boeri L, Zanetti SP, Fulgheri I, Fontana M, Turetti M et al (2021) Clinical comparison of mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy with vacuum cleaner effect or with a vacuum-assisted access sheath: a single-center experience. J Endourol. 35(5):601–608

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lai D, Chen M, Sheng M, Liu Y, Xu G, He Y et al (2020) Use of a novel vacuum-assisted access sheath in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a feasibility study. J Endourol 34(3):339–344

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Du C, Song L, Wu X, Fan D, Zhu L, Liu S et al (2018) Suctioning minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy with a patented system is effective to treat renal staghorn calculi: a prospective multicenter study. Urol Int 101(2):143–149

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhu Z, Cui Y, Zeng H, Li Y, He C, Chen J et al (2019) Suctioning versus traditional minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy to treat renal staghorn calculi: a case-matched comparative study. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 72:85–90

Article  Google Scholar 

Huang J, Song L, Xie D, Li M, Deng X, Hu M et al (2016) A Randomized study of minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) with the aid of a patented suctioning sheath in the treatment of renal calculus complicated by pyonephrosis by one surgery. BMC Urol 16(1):71

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M et al (2016) The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 315(8):801–810

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Somani BK, Desai M, Traxer O, Lahme S (2014) Stone-free rate (SFR): a new proposal for defining levels of SFR. Urolithiasis 42(2):95

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Assel M, Sjoberg D, Elders A, Wang X, Huo D, Botchway A et al (2019) Guidelines for reporting of statistics for clinical research in urology. J Urol 201(3):595–604

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D (2010) CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 1(2):100–107

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Xu G, Liang J, He Y, Li X, Yang W, Lai D et al (2020) Comparison of two different minimally invasive percutaneous nephrostomy sheaths for the treatment of staghorn stones. BJU Int. 125(6):898–904

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhong W, Zeng G, Wu K, Li X, Chen W, Yang H (2008) Does a smaller tract in percutaneous nephrolithotomy contribute to high renal pelvic pressure and postoperative fever? J Endourol 22(9):2147–2151

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif