Omar M, Tarplin S, Brown R, Sivalingam S, Monga M (2016) Shared decision making: why do patients choose ureteroscopy? Urolithiasis 44(2):167–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0806-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Makarov D, Fagerlin A, Finkelstein J et al (2022) American Urological Association (AUA) implementation of shared decision making into urological American Urological Association (AUA) shared decision making. (April):1–19

Shirk JD, Crespi CM, Saucedo JD et al (2017) Does patient preference measurement in decision aids improve decisional conflict? A randomized trial in men with prostate cancer. Patient 10(6):785–798. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-017-0255-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Niburski K, Guadagno E, Abbasgholizadeh-Rahimi S, Poenaru D (2020) Shared decision making in surgery: a meta-analysis of existing literature. Patient 13(6):667–681. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-020-00443-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lane GI, Ellimoottil C, Wallner L, Meeks W, Mbassa R, Clemens JQ (2020) Shared decision-making in urologic practice: results from the 2019 AUA census. Urology 145:66–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.078

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Skolarikos A, Jung H, Neisius A et al (2023) EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Eur Assoc Urol Guidel (March):1–20. https://www.uroweb.org/wp-content/uploads/22-Urolithiasis_LR_full.pdf

Penniston KL, Nakada SY (2016) Treatment expectations and health-related quality of life in stone formers. Curr Opin Urol 26(1):50–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000236

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2700

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nudelman G, Otto K (2020) The development of a new generic risk-of-bias measure for systematic reviews of surveys. Methodology 16(4):278–298. https://doi.org/10.5964/METH.4329

Article  Google Scholar 

Bell JR, Penniston KL, Best SL, Nakada SY (2017) A survey of patient preferences regarding medical expulsive therapy following the SUSPEND trial. Can J Urol 24(3):8827–8831

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuo R, Aslan P, Abrahamse P, Matchar D, Preminger G (1999) Incorporation of patient preferences in the treatment of upper urinary tract calculi: a decision analytical view. J Urol 162(6):1913. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67394-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sarkissian C, Noble M, Li J, Monga M (2013) Patient decision making for asymptomatic renal calculi: Balancing benefit and risk. Urology 81(2):236–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.032

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Walters A, Massella V, Pietropaolo A, Seoane LM, Somani B (2022) Decision-making, preference, and treatment choice for asymptomatic renal stones-balancing benefit and risk of observation and surgical intervention: a real-world survey using social media platform. J Endourol 36(4):522–527. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0677

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spradling K, Bhambhvani HP, Chang T et al (2021) Evaluation of patient treatment preferences for 15 to 20 mm kidney stones: a conjoint analysis. J Endourol 35(5):706–711. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0370

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Karlsen SJ, Renkel J, Tahir AR, Angelsen A, Diep LM (2007) Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy for 5- to 10-mm stones in the proximal ureter: prospective effectiveness patient-preference trial. J Endourol 21(1):28–33. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2006.0153

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Canvasser N, Lay A, Kolitz E, Antonelli J, Pearle M (2017) Mp75-12 Prospective evaluation of stone free rates by computed tomography after aggressive ureteroscopy. J Urol 197(4S):e1007–e1008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.02.2160

Article  Google Scholar 

Kim HJ, Daignault-Newton S, Dibianco JM et al (2022) Real-world practice stone-free rates after ureteroscopy from a surgical collaborative: Much to improve. Eur Urol 81:S1510–S1511. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0302-2838(22)01105-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Montorsi F (2019) On having grey hair. Eur Urol 75(4):541–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.01.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Geraghty RM, Jones P, Somani BK (2017) Worldwide trends of urinary stone disease treatment over the last two decades: a systematic review. J Endourol 31(6):547–556. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0895

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ates F, Zor M, Yılmaz O et al (2016) Management behaviors of the urology practitioners to the small lower calyceal stones: the results of a web-based survey. Urolithiasis 44(3):277–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0825-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shinkunas LA, Klipowicz CJ, Carlisle EM (2020) Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 20(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0

Article  Google Scholar 

Voelker R (1996) Nocebos contribute to host of ills. JAMA 275(5):345–347. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.275.5.345

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hahn RA (1997) The nocebo phenomenon: concept, evidence, and implications for public health. Prev Med (Baltim) 26(5):607–611. https://doi.org/10.1006/pmed.1996.0124

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Eaker ED, Pinsky J, Castelli WP (1992) Myocardial infarction and coronary death among women: psychosocial predictors from a 20-year follow-up of women in the Framingham study. Am J Epidemiol 135(8):854–864. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116381

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mondaini N, Gontero P, Giubilei G et al (2007) Finasteride 5 mg and sexual side effects: how many of these are related to a Nocebo phenomenon? J Sex Med 4(6):1708–1712. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-6109.2007.00563.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Braddock CH, Edwards KA, Hasenberg NM, Laidley TL, Levinson W (1999) Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics. JAMA 282(24):2313–2320. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.282.24.2313

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cabri JN, Saigal CS, Lambrechts S et al (2019) Decisional quality among patients making treatment decisions for urolithiasis. Urology 133:109–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2019.07.023

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maher DI, Serpell JW, Ayton D, Lee JC (2021) Patient reported experience on consenting for surgery—elective versus emergency patients. J Surg Res 265(September):114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2021.03.026

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gökce MI, Esen B, Sancl A, Akplnar C, Süer E, Gülplnar Ö (2017) A Novel decision aid to support informed decision-making process in patients with a symptomatic nonlower pole renal stone <20 mm in diameter. J Endourol 31(7):725–728. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2017.0077

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

The SHARE Approach—Essential Steps of Shared Decisionmaking: Expanded Reference Guide with Sample Conversation Starters. Ahrq 1–14. https://www.ahrq.gov/health-literacy/curriculum-tools/shareddecisionmaking/tools/tool-2/index.html