Thulium:YAG laser: a good compromise between holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser for endoscopic lithotripsy? A narrative review

Scales CD, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS, Urologic Diseases in America Project (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Raheem OA, Khandwala YS, Sur RL, Ghani KR, Denstedt JD (2017) Burden of urolithiasis: trends in prevalence, treatments, and costs. Eur Urol Focus 3(1):18–26

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stamatelou K, Goldfarb DS (2023) Epidemiology of kidney stones. Healthc Basel Switz 11(3):424

Google Scholar 

Türk C, Petřík A, Sarica K, Seitz C, Skolarikos A, Straub M et al (2016) EAU Guidelines on Interventional Treatment for Urolithiasis. Eur Urol 69(3):475–482

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Johnson DE, Cromeens DM, Price RE (1992) Use of the holmium:YAG laser in urology. Lasers Surg Med 12(4):353–363

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Urofrance | Recommandations de bonne pratique pour la prise en charge des calculs et de la lithiase urinaires: diagnostic, traitement, suivi et prévention secondaire—Argumentaire—Urofrance [Internet]. 2022 [cité 17 Nov 2022]. Disponible sur: https://www.urofrance.org/recommandation/recommandations-de-bonne-pratique-pour-la-prise-en-charge-des-calculs-et-de-la-lithiase-urinaires-diagnostic-traitement-suivi-et-prevention-secondaire-argumentaire/

Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O (2020) What is the exact definition of stone dust? An in vitro evaluation. World J Urol 8:1

Google Scholar 

Keller EX, De Coninck V, Doizi S, Daudon M, Traxer O (2021) Thulium fiber laser: ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? World J Urol 39(6):1693–1698

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Keller EX, de Coninck V, Audouin M, Doizi S, Bazin D, Daudon M et al (2019) Fragments and dust after Holmium laser lithotripsy with or without « Moses technology »: How are they different? J Biophotonics avr 12(4):e201800227

Article  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Keller EX (2020) Thulium fiber laser: the new player for kidney stone treatment? A comparison with Holmium:YAG laser. World J Urol 38(8):1883–1894

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panthier F, Doizi S, Corrales M, Traxer O (2021) Pulsed lasers and endocorporeal laser lithotripsy. Prog En Urol 31(8–9):451–457

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R (2021) In vitro dusting performance of a new solid state thulium laser compared to holmium laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 35(2):221–225

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kraft L, Yilmaz M, Petzold R, Gratzke C, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A (2022) Dusting efficiency of a novel pulsed thulium: yttrium aluminum garnet laser vs. a thulium fiber laser. J Endourol 36(2):259–265

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A (2021) Temperature assessment of a novel pulsed thulium solid-state laser compared with a Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet Laser. J Endourol 35(6):853–859

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Manuel d’utilisation Dornier Thulio. Dornier (2022)

Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A (2021) Gas bubble anatomy during laser lithotripsy: an experimental in vitro study of a pulsed solid-state Tm:YAG and Ho:YAG Device. J Endourol 35(7):1051–1057

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kraft L, Petzold R, Suarez-Ibarrola R, Miernik A (2022) In vitro fragmentation performance of a novel, pulsed Thulium solid-state laser compared to a Thulium fibre laser and standard Ho:YAG laser. Lasers Med Sci 37(3):2071–2078

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kwok JL, Ventimiglia E, De Coninck V, Corrales M, Sierra A, Panthier F et al (2023) Pulsed thulium:YAG laser-ready to dust all urinary stone composition types? Results from a PEARLS analysis. World J Urol 2023:1

Google Scholar 

Petzold R, Miernik A, Suarez-Ibarrola R (2021) Retropulsion force in laser lithotripsy—an in vitro study comparing a Holmium device to a novel pulsed solid-state Thulium laser. World J Urol 39(9):3651–3656

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Panthier F, Solano C, Chicaud M, Kutchukian S, Candela L, Doizi S et al (2023) Initial clinical experience with the pulsed solid-state thulium YAG laser from Dornier during RIRS: first 25 cases. World J Urol 41(8):2119–2125

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ventimiglia E, Villa L, Doizi S, Briganti A, Proietti S, Giusti G et al (2021) Laser lithotripsy: the importance of peak power and pulse modulation. Eur Urol Focus 7(1):22–25

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Corrales M (2021) Managing urolithiasis with thulium fiber laser: updated real-life results—a systematic review. J Clin Med 10(15):3390

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blackmon RL, Irby PB, Fried NM (2011) Comparison of holmium:YAG and thulium fiber laser lithotripsy: ablation thresholds, ablation rates, and retropulsion effects. J Biomed Opt 16(7):071403

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ventimiglia E, Doizi S, Kovalenko A, Andreeva V, Traxer O (2020) Effect of temporal pulse shape on urinary stone phantom retropulsion rate and ablation efficiency using holmium:YAG and super-pulse thulium fibre lasers. BJU Int 126(1):159–167

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wollin DA, Ackerman A, Yang C, Chen T, Simmons WN, Preminger GM et al (2017) Variable pulse duration from a new Holmium:YAG Laser: the effect on stone comminution, fiber tip degradation, and retropulsion in a dusting model. Urology 103:47–51

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, Beisland C, Ulvik Ø (2022) Temperature profiles during ureteroscopy with thulium fiber laser and holmium:YAG laser: findings from a pre-clinical study. Scand J Urol 56(4):313–319

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panthier F, Pauchard F, Traxer O (2023) Retrograde intra renal surgery and safety: pressure and temperature. A systematic review. Curr Opin Urol 33(4):308–317

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aldoukhi AH, Black KM, Hall TL, Roberts WW, Ghani KR (2020) Frequency threshold for ablation during holmium laser lithotripsy: How high can you go? J Endourol 34(10):1075–1081

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aldoukhi AH, Hall TL, Ghani KR, Roberts WW (2021) Strike rate: analysis of laser fiber to stone distance during different modes of laser lithotripsy. J Endourol 35(3):355–359

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panthier F, Doizi S, Gorny C, Berthe L, Traxer O (2020) Impact of laser fiber diameter and irrigation fluids on induced bubble stream dynamics with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study. J Endourol 2020:1

Google Scholar 

Panthier F, Doizi S, Lapouge P, Chaussain C, Kogane N, Berthe L et al (2020) Comparison of the ablation rates, fissures and fragments produced with 150 µm and 272 µm laser fibers with superpulsed thulium fiber laser: an in vitro study. World J Urol 2020:1

Google Scholar 

Nazif OA, Teichman JMH, Glickman RD, Welch AJ (2004) Review of laser fibers: a practical guide for urologists. J Endourol 18(9):818–829

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haddad M, Emiliani E, Rouchausse Y, Coste F, Doizi S, Berthe L et al (2017) Impact of the curve diameter and laser settings on laser fiber fracture. J Endourol 31(9):918–921

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Laser JC (2020) Lithotripsy fundamentals: from the physics to optimal fragmentation. Open Access J Urol Nephrol 5(3):1–10

Article  Google Scholar 

Ulvik Ø, Æsøy MS, Juliebø-Jones P, Gjengstø P, Beisland C (2022) Thulium fibre laser versus Holmium:YAG for ureteroscopic lithotripsy: outcomes from a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol (Internet). 14 mars 2022 [cité 16 mars 2022]. Disponible sur: https://www.europeanurology.com/article/S0302-2838(22)01669-4/fulltext

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif