Acevedo RJ, Rivera-Vega A, Miranda G, Micheo W (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament injury: identification of risk factors and prevention strategies. Curr Sports Med Rep 13(3):186–191

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Agarwal N, Monketh J, Volpin A (2022) Clinical and mechanical outcomes in isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction vs additional lateral extra-articular tenodesis or anterolateral ligament reconstruction. World J Orthop 13(7):662–675

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Anand BS, Feller JA, Richmond AK, Webster KE (2016) Return-to-sport outcomes after revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 44(3):580–584

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2014) Fifty-five per cent return to competitive sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis including aspects of physical functioning and contextual factors. Br J Sports Med 48(21):1543–1552

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Charlton WP, John TA, Ciccotti MG, Harrison N, Schweitzer M (2002) Differences in femoral notch anatomy between men and women: a Magnetic Resonance Imaging study. Am J Sports Med 30(3):329–333

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Conte EJ, Hyatt AE, Gatt CJ, Dhawan A (2014) Hamstring autograft size can be predicted and is a potential risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction failure. Arthroscopy 30(7):882–890

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DeFazio MW, Curry EJ, Gustin MJ, Sing DC, Abdul-Rassoul H, Ma R et al (2020) Return to sport after ACL reconstruction with a BTB versus hamstring tendon autograft: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med 8(12):2325967120964919

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dietvorst M, van der Steen M, van den Besselaar M, Janssen RP (2023) Height is a predictor of hamstring tendon length and ACL graft characteristics in adolescents. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24(1):563. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06705-2

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fritsch B, Figueroa F, Semay B (2017) Graft preparation technique to optimize hamstring graft diameter for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthrosc Tech 6(6):e2169–e2175

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hefti F, Müller W, Jakob RP, Stäubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1(3–4):226–234

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Inderhaug E, Drogset JO, Lygre SHL, Gifstad T (2020) No effect of graft size or body mass index on risk of revision after ACL reconstruction using hamstrings autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:707–713

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Itoh M, Itou J, Okazaki K, Iwasaki K (2023) Estimation of failure risk by 0.5-mm differences in autologous hamstring graft diameter in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med. https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465221150654

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Magnussen RA, Lawrence JT, West RL, Toth AP, Taylor DC, Garrett WE (2012) Graft size and patient age are predictors of early revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Arthroscopy 28(4):526–531

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mariscalco MW, Flanigan DC, Mitchell J (2013) The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient reported outcomes and risk of revision following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a MOON cohort study. Arthroscopy 29(12):1948–1953

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Melick N, van Cingel RE, Brooijmans F, Neeter C, van Tienen T, Hullegie W et al (2016) Evidence-based clinical practice update: practice guidelines for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation based on a systematic review and multidisciplinary consensus. Br J Sports Med 50(24):1506–1515

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Melick N, Pronk Y, Nijhuis-van der Sanden M, Rutten S, van Tienen T, Hoogeboom T (2022) Meeting movement quantity or quality return to sport criteria is associated with reduced second ACL injury rate. J Orthop Res 40(1):117–128

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mirzayan R, Chang RN, Royse KE, Prentice HA, Maletis GB (2023) No difference in revision risk between autologous hamstring graft less than 8 mm versus hybrid graft 8 mm or larger in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31:3465–3473

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mishra P, Goyal A, Gupta H, Bhavani P, Lal H, Kumar S (2022) Correlation between height and semitendinosus tendon length, prediction of minimum semitendinosus tendon length based on height-an easy and accurate method. J Clin Orthop Trauma 31:101918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101918

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Papaloucas N (2018) All-Inside technique for ACL-reconstruction using a FlipCutter® and the TightRope® system. Surg Technol Int 32:337–345

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Park SY, Oh H, Park S, Lee JH, Lee SH, Yoon KH (2013) Factors predicting hamstring tendon autograft diameters and resulting failure rates after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(5):1111–1118

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramkumar PN, Hadley MD, Jones MH, Farrow LD (2018) Hamstring autograft in ACL reconstruction: a 13-year predictive analysis of anthropometric factors and surgeon trends relating to graft size. Orthop J Sports Med 6(6):2325967118779788. https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118779788

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin-Senorski E, Ayeni OR, Alentorn-Geli E, Krupic F, Norberg F et al (2017) Graft diameter as a predictor for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and KOOS and EQ-5D values: a cohort study from the Swedish national knee ligament register based on 2240 patients. Am J Sports Med 45(9):2092–2097

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Snaebjörnsson T, Hamrin-Senorski E, Svantesson E, Karlsson L, Engebretsen L, Karlsson J et al (2019) Graft diameter and graft type as predictors of anterior cruciate ligament revision: a cohort study including 18,425 patients from the Swedish and Norwegian national knee ligament registries. J Bone Jt Surg AM 101(20):1812–1820

Article  Google Scholar 

Snaebjörnsson T, Svantesson E, Sundemo D, Westin O, Sansone M, Engebretsen L et al (2019) Young age and high BMI are predictors of early revision surgery after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cohort study from the Swedish and Norwegian knee ligament registries based on 30,747 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(11):3583–3591

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Spragg L, Chen J, Mirzayan R, Love R, Maletis G (2016) The effect of autologous hamstring graft diameter on the likelihood for revision of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44(6):1475–1481

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tang SP, Wan KH, Lee RH, Wong KK, Wong KK (2020) Influence of hamstring autograft diameter on graft failure rate in Chinese population after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol 22:45–2248

CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang H, Tao M, Shi Q, He K, Cheng CK (2022) Graft diameter should reflect the size of the native anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) to improve the outcome of ACL reconstruction: a finite element analysis. Bioengineering 9(10):507. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering9100507

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wiggins AJ, Grandhi RK, Schneider DK, Stanfield D, Webster KE, Myer GD (2016) Risk of secondary injury in younger athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 44(7):1861–1876

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhao D, Pan J, Lin FZ, Luo MH, Liang GH, Zen LF et al (2023) Risk factors for revision or rerupture after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 51(11):3053–3075

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar