Digital informed consent for urological surgery - randomized controlled study comparing multimedia-supported vs. traditional paper-based informed consent concerning satisfaction, anxiety, information gain and time efficiency

Aufklärungspflichten. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. Sect. Buch 2 - Recht der Schuldverhältnisse (§§ 241 - 853), Abschnitt 8 - Einzelne Schuldverhältnisse (§§ 433 - 853), Titel 8 - Dienstvertrag und ähnliche Verträge (§§ 611 - 630h), Untertitel 2 - Behandlungsvertrag (§§ 630a - 630h).

Bollschweiler E, Apitzsch J, Obliers R, Koerfer A, Mönig SP, Metzger R, et al. Improving informed consent of surgical patients using a multimedia-based program? Results of a prospective randomized multicenter study of patients before cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 2008;248:205–11.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paterick TJ, Carson GV, Allen MC, Paterick TE. Medical informed consent: general considerations for physicians. Mayo Clin Proc. 2008;83:313–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dokumentation der Behandlung. Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch. Sect. Buch 2 - Recht der Schuldverhältnisse (§§ 241 - 853), Abschnitt 8 - Einzelne Schuldverhältnisse (§§ 433 - 853), Titel 8 - Dienstvertrag und ähnliche Verträge (§§ 611 - 630h), Untertitel 2 - Behandlungsvertrag (§§ 630a - 630h).

Lorenzetti DL, Quan H, Lucyk K, Cunningham C, Hennessy D, Jiang J, et al. Strategies for improving physician documentation in the emergency department: a systematic review. BMC Emerg Med. 2018;18:36.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sinsky C, Colligan L, Li L, Prgomet M, Reynolds S, Goeders L, et al. Allocation of physician time in ambulatory practice: a time and motion study in 4 specialties. Ann Intern Med. 2016;165:753–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Joukes E, Abu-Hanna A, Cornet R, de Keizer NF. Time spent on dedicated patient care and documentation tasks before and after the introduction of a structured and standardized electronic health record. Appl Clin Inf. 2018;9:46–53.

Article  Google Scholar 

Joukes E, de Keizer N, Abu-Hanna A, de Bruijne M, Cornet R. End-user experiences and expectations regarding data registration and reuse before the implementation of a (new) electronic health record: a case study in two university hospitals. Stud Health Technol Inf. 2015;216:997.

Google Scholar 

Schmidt S, Hendricks V, Griebenow R, Riedel R. Demographic change and its impact on the health-care budget for heart failure inpatients in Germany during 1995-2025. Herz. 2013;38:862–7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Health workforce. 2023. Available from: https://www.who.int/health-topics/health-workforce.

Why is the world now facing a medical recruitment crisis? World Economic Forum. 2023. Available from: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/medical-recruitment-crisis-davos23/.

Ham DY, Choi WS, Song SH, Ahn YJ, Park HK, Kim HG, et al. Prospective randomized controlled study on the efficacy of multimedia informed consent for patients scheduled to undergo green-light high-performance system photoselective vaporization of the prostate. World J Mens Health. 2016;34:47–55.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aapro M, Bossi P, Dasari A, Fallowfield L, Gascón P, Geller M, et al. Digital health for optimal supportive care in oncology: benefits, limits, and future perspectives. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28:4589–612.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abujarad F, Peduzzi P, Mun S, Carlson K, Edwards C, Dziura J, et al. Comparing a multimedia digital informed consent tool with traditional paper-based methods: randomized controlled trial. JMIR Form Res. 2021;5:e20458.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jefford M, Moore R. Improvement of informed consent and the quality of consent documents. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:485–93.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rothwell E, Wong B, Rose NC, Anderson R, Fedor B, Stark LA, et al. A randomized controlled trial of an electronic informed consent process. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014;9:1–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Abujarad F, Alfano S, Bright TJ, Kannoth S, Grant N, Gueble M, et al. Building an informed consent tool starting with the patient: the patient-centered virtual multimedia interactive informed consent (VIC). Proc AMIA Symp. 2017;2017:374–83.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Madeira JL, Rehbein J, Christianson MS, Lee M, Parry JP, Pennings G, et al. Using the EngagedMD multimedia platform to improve informed consent for ovulation induction, intrauterine insemination, and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2018;110. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30503133/.

Kalish LA, Begg CB. Treatment allocation methods in clinical trials: a review. Stat Med. 1985;4:129–44.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nghiem SH, Connelly LB. Convergence and determinants of health expenditures in OECD countries. Health Econ Rev. 2017;7:29.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chandra A, Skinner J. Technology growth and expenditure growth in health care. J Econ Lit. 2012;50:645–80.

Article  Google Scholar 

Satisfaction with In-Patient Cancer Care. EORTC – Quality of Life. 2023. Available from: https://qol.eortc.org/questionnaire/satisfaction-with-in-patient-cancer-care/.

Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–96.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berry DL, Ellis WJ, Woods NF, Schwien C, Mullen KH, Yang C. Treatment decision-making by men with localized prostate cancer: the influence of personal factors. Urol Oncol. 2003;21:93–100.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lin GA, Aaronson DS, Knight SJ, Carroll PR, Dudley RA. Patient decision aids for prostate cancer treatment: a systematic review of the literature. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:379–90.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Steginga SK, Occhipinti S, Gardiner RA, Yaxley J, Heathcote P. Making decisions about treatment for localized prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2002;89:255–60.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Finkenauer C, Vohs KD. Bad is stronger than good. Rev Gen Psychol. 2001;5:323–70.

Article  Google Scholar 

Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T. Digital multimedia: a new approach for informed consent? JAMA. 2015;313:463–4.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cummins N, Schuller BW. Five crucial challenges in digital health. Front Digit Health. 2020;2. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fdgth.2020.536203.

Rahimi K. Digital health and the elusive quest for cost savings. Lancet Digit Health. 2019;1:e108–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faverio M. Share of those 65 and older who are tech users has grown in the past decade. Pew Research Center; 2022. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2022/01/13/share-of-those-65-and-older-who-are-tech-users-has-grown-in-the-past-decade/.

Rice RE, Katz JE. Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecommun. Policy. 2003;27:597–623.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nguyen TXH, Tran TBN, Dao TB, Barysheva G, Nguyen CT, Nguyen AH, et al. Elderly people’s adaptation to the evolving digital society: a case study in Vietnam. Soc. Sci. 2022;11:324.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lewis D. Computer-based approaches to patient education: a review of the literature. J Am Med Inf Assoc. 1999;6:272–82.

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Reis J, Wrestler F. Consumer attitudes towards computer-assisted self-care of the common cold. Patient Educ Couns. 1994;23:55–62.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif