Out-of-Pocket Expenditure for Antenatal Care Amid Free Health Care Provision: Evidence From a Large Pregnancy Cohort in Rural Sri Lanka

Key Findings

Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health care utilization even with free health services in many low- and middle-income countries.

Despite having access to free maternal health services provided by the government of Sri Lanka, most pregnant women tend to use both government and private health facilities and incur higher OOP expenditures.

Because Sri Lanka provides free maternal health care services, the direct medical OOP expenditure for medicines and laboratory investigations should be at a minimum level. However, the direct medical OOP was approximately half of the OOP expenditure share for pregnant women who used only government health care services.

Key Implications

Use of free, government-provided maternal health care services should be encouraged to minimize the economic burden of maternal OOP expenditure, especially for low-income groups.

Policies should be developed that ensure the adequate availability of medicines and essential services in government health care facilities.

Future research should focus on the economic impact of high OOP expenditure on the households of pregnant women.

Introduction:

Global evidence suggests that high out-of-pocket (OOP) expenditure negatively affects health service utilization and creates an economic burden on households during pregnancy. This study aimed to estimate the magnitude and associated factors of OOP expenditure for antenatal care (ANC) in a rural Sri Lankan setting by following up with a large pregnancy cohort (The Rajarata Pregnancy Cohort [RaPCo]) in Anuradhapura District, Sri Lanka.

Methods:

Data were collected from July 2019 to May 2020. An interviewer-administered questionnaire was used to collect socioeconomic data and OOP expenditures in the first trimester. Self-administered questionnaires were used monthly to collect OOP expenditures in the second and third trimesters. In-depth financial information of 1,558 pregnant women was analyzed using descriptive statistics, nonparametric statistics, and a multiple linear regression model.

Results:

The majority of participants used both government and private health facilities for ANC. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) OOP expenditure per ANC visit was US$4.18 (US$4.19), and the mean (SD) OOP expenditure for total ANC was US$57.74 (US$80.96). Pregnant women who used only free government health services also spent 28% and 14% of OOP expenditure on medicines and laboratory investigations. Household income (P<.001), household expenditure (P<.1), used health care mode (P<.05), maternal morbidities (P<.05), and the number of previous pregnancies (P<.1) were the statistically significant independent predictors of OOP expenditure. OOP expenditure per visit for ANC equals half of the daily household expenditure.

Conclusion:

Despite having freely available government health facilities, most pregnant women tend to use both government and private health facilities and incur higher OOP expenditure. Free government health care users also incur a direct medical OOP expenditure for medicines and laboratory investigations. Monthly household income, expenditure, used health care mode, maternal morbidities, and the number of previous pregnancies are independent predictors of OOP expenditure.

Received: November 15, 2022.Accepted: September 29, 2023.Published: October 30, 2023.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly cited. To view a copy of the license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. When linking to this article, please use the following permanent link: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00410

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif