Abeare, C. A., An, K., Tyson, B., Holcomb, M., Cutler, L., May, N., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022a). The Emotion Word Fluency Test as an embedded validity indicator, alone and in multivariate verbal fluency validity composite. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 11(4), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1939027

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abeare, C. A., Hurtubise, J., Cutler, L., Sirianni, C., Brantuo, M., Makhzoun, N., & Erdodi, L. (2021a). Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(8), 1442–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1779348

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abeare, C., Sabelli, A., Taylor, B., Holcomb, M., Dumitrescu, C., Kirsch, N., & Erdodi, L. (2019). The importance of demographically adjusted cutoffs: Age and education bias in raw score cutoffs within the Trail Making Test. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09353-x

Article  Google Scholar 

Abeare, K., Cutler, L., An, K. Y., Razvi, P., Holcomb, M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). BNT-15: Revised performance validity cutoffs and proposed clinical classification ranges. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/WNN.0000000000000304.

Abeare, K., Romero, K., Cutler, L., Sirianni, C. D., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021b). Flipping the script: Measuring both performance validity and cognitive ability with the Forced Choice Recognition trial of the RCFT. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 128(4), 1373–1408. https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125211019704

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Alnowami, M., Taha, E., Alsebaeai, S., Anwar, S. M., & Alhawsawi, A. (2022). MR image normalization dilemma and the accuracy of brain tumor classification model. Journal of Radiation Research and Applied Sciences, 15(3), 33–39.

Article  Google Scholar 

An, K. Y., Charles, J., Ali, S., Enache, A., Dhuga, J., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Re-examining performance validity cutoffs within the Complex Ideational Material and the Boston Naming Test - Short Form using an experimental malingering paradigm. Journal or Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 41(1), 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2018.1483488

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arentsen, T. J., Boone, K. B., Lo, T. T., Goldberg, H. E., Cottingham, M. E., Victor, T. L., ... & Zeller, M. A. (2013). Effectiveness of the Comalli Stroop Test as a measure of negative response bias. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(6), 1060–1076.

Ashendorf, L. (2019). Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test and Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure Test performance validity indices in a VA polytrauma sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(8), 1388–1402. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1543454

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ashendorf, L., Clark, E. L., & Sugarman, M. A. (2017). Performance validity and processing speed in a VA polytrauma sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(5), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1285961

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ashendorf, L., O’Bryant, S. E., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2003). Specificity of malingering detection strategies in older adults using the CVLT and WCST. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(2), 255–262.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Axelrod, B. N., Fichtenberg, N. L., Millis, S. R., & Wertheimer, J. C. (2006). Detecting incomplete effort with Digit Span from the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – Third Edition. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(3), 513–523.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Axelrod, B. N., Meyers, J. E., & Davis, J. J. (2014). Finger tapping test performance as a measure of performance validity. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(5), 876–888. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.907583

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Babikian, T., Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Arnold, G. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of various Digit Span scores in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(1), 145–159.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Barhon, L. I., Batchelor, J., Meares, S., Chekaluk, E., & Shores, E. A. (2015). A comparison of the degree of effort involved in the TOMM and the ACS Word Choice Test using a dual-task paradigm. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 22, 114–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2013.863775

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Berthelson, L., Mulchan, S. S., Odland, A., & P., Miller, L. J., & Mittenberg, W. (2013). False positive diagnosis of malingering due to the use of multiple effort tests. Brain Injury, 27(7–8), 909–916.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bianchini, K. J., Greve, K. W., & Glynn, G. (2005). On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: Lessons from cognitive malingering research. The Spine Journal, 5(4), 404–417.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bianchini, K. J., Mathias, C. W., & Greve, K. W. (2001). Symptom validity testing: A critical review. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 15(1), 19–45.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bigler, E. D. (2012). Symptom validity testing, effort and neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 632–642. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617712000252

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bigler, E. D. (2014). Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 28(13–14), 1623–1638. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699052.2014.947627

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bigler, E. D. (2015). Neuroimaging as a biomarker in symptom validity and performance validity testing. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 9(3), 421–444. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9409-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Blaskewitz, N., Merten, T., & Brockhaus, R. (2009). Detection of suboptimal effort with the Rey Complex Figure Test and Recognition Trial. Applied Neuropsychology, 16, 54–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examination. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(4), 729–741. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802427803

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical Practice of Forensic Neuropsychology. New York, NY: Guilford.

Boone, K. B. (2017). Self-deception in somatoform conditions: Differentiating between conscious and nonconscious symptom feigning. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology/Routledge continuing education series. Neuropsychological evaluation of somatoform and other functional somatic conditions: Assessment primer (p. 3–42). Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315266992-1

Bortnik, K. E., Boone, K. B., Marion, S. D., Amano, S., Ziegler, E., Victor, T. L., & Zeller, M. A. (2010). Examination of various WMS-III Logical Memory scores in the assessment of response bias. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 24(2), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040903307268

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bortnik, K. E., Horner, M. D., & Bachman, D. L. (2013). Performance on standard indexes of effort among patients with dementia. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 20(4), 233–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084282.2012.695757

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boskovic, I., Biermans, A. J., Merten, T., Jelicic, M., Hope, L., & Merckelbach, H. (2018). The Modified Stroop Task is susceptible to feigning: Stroop performance and symptom over-endorsement in feigned test anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1195. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01195

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boucher, C., May, N., Shahein, A., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Examining the effect of repeat administration, alternate versions and performance validity on letter fluency tests in a mixed clinical sample. Advance online publication.

Book  Google Scholar 

Bush, S. S., Heilbronner, R. L., & Ruff, R. M. (2014). Psychological assessment of symptom and performance validity, response bias, and malingering: Official position of the Association for Scientific Advancement in Psychological Injury and Law. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9198-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., Reynolds, C. R., & Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity (NAN Policy and Planning Committees). Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20(4), 419–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chafetz, M. D. (2022). Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide “evidence” for “good effort.” The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(6), 1244–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1840633

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chafetz, M. D., Williams, M. A., Ben-Porath, Y. S., Bianchini, K. J., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Larrabee, G. J., & Ord, J. S. (2015). Official position of the American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Social Security Administration policy on validity testing: Guidance and recommendations for change. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 723–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1099738

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen, P., & Pan, C. (2018). Diabetes classification model based on boosting algorithms. BMC Bioinformatics, 19, 1–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cottingham, M. E., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Ziegler, E. A., & Zeller, M. (2014). Apparent effect of type of compensation seeking (disability vs. litigation) on performance validity test scores may be due to other factors. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28(6), 1030–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2014.951397

Crişan, I., Matei, A., Avram, D. L., Bunghez, C., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023a). Full of surprises: Performance validity testing in examinees with limited English proficiency. Psychological Injury and Law, 16(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-023-09474-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Crişan, I., May, N., Giromini, L., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023b). Replicating the classification accuracy of the Verbal Paired Associates and Visual Reproduction recognition trials as embedded performance validity tests. Neuropsychology. Advance online publication.

Curtis, K. L., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., & Brennan, A. (2006). California Verbal Learning Test indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Sensitivity and specificity in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 13(1), 46–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Curtis, K. L., Thompson, L. K., Greve, K. W., & Bianchini, K. J. (2008). Verbal fluency indicators of malingering in traumatic brain injury: Classification accuracy in known groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 22, 930–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701563591

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cutler, L., Abeare, C., Messa, I., Holcomb, M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). This will only take a minute: Time cutoffs are superior to accuracy cutoffs on the Forced Choice Recognition trial of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(6), 1425–1439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1884555

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cutler, L., Greenacre, M., Abeare, C. A., Sirianni, C. D., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. (2022). Multivariate models provide an effective psychometric solution to the variability in classification accuracy of D-KEFS Stroop performance validity cutoffs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2022.2073914

Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W. H. M., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs on neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28, 771–873.

Article  PubMed