AIOM (2020) I Numeri del Cancro in Italia; AIOM: Milano, Italy.
American Cancer Society (2019) Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2019–2020; American Cancer Society Inc.: Atlanta, GA, USA; Available online: www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@epidemiologysurveilance/documents/document/acspc-030975.pdf. Accessed on 15 November 2020.
Schwab FD, Huang DJ, Schmid SM, Schötzau A, Güth U (2015) Self-detection and clinical breast examination: comparison of the two “classical” physical examination methods for the diagnosis of breast cancer. Breast 24:90–92
Heywang-Köbrunner S, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Küchler C (1997) Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol 24:94–108
Dessouky B, Elsaid N, Shaaban Y (2017) Role of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluation of breast lesions. Menoufia Med J 30:861
Lewis TC, Patel BK, Pizzitola VJ (2017) Navigating contrast-enhanced digital mammography. Appl Radiol 46:21–28
Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M, Ferrari A, Speziani M, Bellarosa S, Remida G, Gasparotti C, Galligioni E, Ciatto S (2011) Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammography-negative dense breasts: Interval breast cancers at 1year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 47:1021–1026
Hersh, M.R. Imaging the dense breast. Appl. Radiol. 2004, 33.
Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, Harms S, Leach MO, Lehman CD, Morris E, Pisano E, Schnall M, Sener S et al (2007) American cancer society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA A Cancer J Clin 57:75–89
Maglogiannis I, Zafiropoulos E, Anagnostopoulos I (2007) An intelligent system for automated breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis using SVM based classifiers. Appl Intell 30:24–36
Petrillo A, Fusco R, Di Bernardo E, Petrosino T, Barretta ML, Porto A, Granata V, Di Bonito M, Fanizzi A, Massafra R, Petruzzellis N, Arezzo F, Boldrini L, La Forgia D (2022) Prediction of breast cancer histological outcome by radiomics and artificial intelligence analysis in contrast-enhanced mammography. Cancers (Basel) 14(9):2132. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14092132
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Kim JJ, Kim JY, Hwangbo L, Suh HB, Son Y, Nickel MD, Grimm R (2021) Ultrafast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using compressed sensing: associations of early kinetic parameters with prognostic factors of breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol 217(1):56–63. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.20.23457
Cheng L, Li X (2013) Breast magnetic resonance imaging: kinetic curve assessment. Gland Surg 2(1):50–53. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2013.02.04
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
van Griethuysen JJM, Fedorov A, Parmar C, Hosny A, Aucoin N, Narayan V, Beets-Tan RGH, Fillon-Robin JC, Pieper S, Aerts HJWL (2017) Computational radiomics system to decode the radiographic phenotype. Can Res 77(21):e104–e107. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0339
Feng S, Yin J (2022) Radiomics of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parametric maps and apparent diffusion coefficient maps to predict Ki-67 status in breast cancer. Front Oncol 12:847880. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.847880
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nicosia L, Pesapane F, Bozzini AC, Latronico A, Rotili A, Ferrari F, Signorelli G, Raimondi S, Vignati S, Gaeta A, Bellerba F, Origgi D, De Marco P, Castiglione Minischetti G, Sangalli C, Montesano M, Palma S, Cassano E (2023) Prediction of the malignancy of a breast lesion detected on breast ultrasound: radiomics applied to clinical practice. Cancers (Basel) 15(3):964. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15030964
Cui H, Sun Y, Zhao D, Zhang X, Kong H, Hu N, Wang P, Zuo X, Fan W, Yao Y, Fu B, Tian J, Wu M, Gao Y, Ning S, Zhang L (2023) Radiogenomic analysis of prediction HER2 status in breast cancer by linking ultrasound radiomic feature module with biological functions. J Transl Med 21(1):44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03840-7
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Sinha S, Lucas-Quesada FA, DeBruhl ND, Sayre J, Farria D, Gorczyca DP, Bassett LW (1997) Multifeature analysis of Gd-enhanced MR images of breast lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 7:1016–1026. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.1880070613
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Vomweg TW, Buscema PM, Kauczor HU, Teifke A, Intraligi M, Terzi S, Heussel CP, Achenbach T, Rieker O, Mayer D et al (2003) Improved artificial neural networks in prediction of malignancy of lesions in contrast-enhanced MR-mammography. Med Phys 30:2350–2359. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1600871
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Sathya DJ, Geetha K (2013) Mass classification in breast DCE-MR images using an artificial neural network trained via a bee colony optimization algorithm. Science 39:294. https://doi.org/10.2306/scienceasia1513-1874.2013.39.294
Sathya J, Geetha K (2013) Experimental investigation of classification algorithms for predicting lesion type on breast DCE-MR images. Int J Comput Appl 82:1–8. https://doi.org/10.5120/14101-2125
Fusco R, Sansone M, Petrillo A, Sansone C (2012) A multiple classifier system for classification of breast lesions using dynamic and morphological features in DCE-MRI. Comput Vis 7626:684–692
Degenhard A, Tanner C, Hayes C, Hawkes DJO, Leach M (2002) The UK MRI breast screening study comparison between radiological and artificial neural network diagnosis in clinical screening. Physiol Meas 23:727–739. https://doi.org/10.1088/0967-3334/23/4/311
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Li C, Song L, Yin J (2021) Intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on functional parametric maps from breast DCE-MRI for prediction of HER-2 and Ki-67 status. J Magn Reson Imaging 54(3):703–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.27651
Shin JK, Kim JY (2017) Dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MRI of estrogen receptor-positive invasive breast cancers: Associations between quantitative MR parameters and Ki-67 proliferation status. J Magn Reson Imaging 45(1):94–102. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.25348
Fusco R, Sansone M, Sansone C, Petrillo A (2012) Segmentation and classification of breast lesions using dynamic and textural features in dynamic contrast enhanced-magnetic resonance imaging. In: Proceedings of the 25th IEEE International Sympo-sium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), Rome, Italy, 20–22 June 2012; pp. 1–4.
Fusco R, Piccirillo A, Sansone M, Granata V, Vallone P, Barretta ML, Petrosino T, Siani C, Di Giacomo R, Petrillo A et al (1880) Radiomic and artificial intelligence analysis with textural metrics, morphological and dynamic perfusion features extracted by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the classification of breast lesions. Appl Sci 2021:11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041880
Kocak B, Baessler B, Bakas S, Cuocolo R, Fedorov A, Maier-Hein L, Mercaldo N, Müller H, Orlhac F, Pinto Dos Santos D, Stanzione A, Ugga L, Zwanenburg A (2023) CheckList for evaluation of radiomics research (CLEAR): a step-by-step reporting guideline for authors and reviewers endorsed by ESR and EuSoMII. Insights Imaging 14(1):75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-023-01415-8
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chen Z, Lin T, Xia X, Xu H, Ding S (2017) A synthetic neighborhood generation based ensemble learning for the imbalanced data classification. Appl Intell 48:2441–2457
Fusco R, Sansone M, Filice S, Carone G, Amato DM, Sansone C, Petrillo A (2016) Pattern recognition approaches for breast cancer DCE-MRI classification: a systematic review. J Med Biol Eng 36:449–459
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Tibshirani R (1996) Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc Ser B: Stat Methodol 58(1):267–288
Abdolmaleki P, Buadu LD, Naderimansh H (2001) Feature extraction and classification of breast cancer on dynamic magnetic resonance imaging using artificial neural network. Cancer Lett 171:183–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3835(01)00508-0
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Agner SC, Soman S, Libfeld E, McDonald M, Thomas K, Englander S, Rosen MA, Chin D, Nosher J, Madabhushi A (2010) Textural kinetics: a novel dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE)-MRI feature for breast lesion classification. J Digit Ima-ging 24:446–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9298-1
Levman J, Leung T, Causer P, Plewes D, Martel AL (2008) Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 27:688–696. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2008.916959
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fusco R, Piccirillo A, Sansone M, Granata V, Rubulotta MR, Petrosino T, Barretta ML, Vallone P, Di Giacomo R, Esposito E et al (2021) Radiomics and artificial intelligence analysis with textural metrics extracted by contrast-enhanced mammography in the breast lesions classification. Diagnostics 30:815. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050815
Fanizzi A, Losurdo L, Basile TMA, Bellotti R, Bottigli U, Delogu P, Diacono D, Didonna V, Fausto A, Lombardi A et al (2019) Fully automated support system for diagnosis of breast cancer in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images. J Clin Med 8:891. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060891
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Massafra R, Bove S, Lorusso V, Biafora A, Comes MC, Didonna V, Diotaiuti S, Fanizzi A, Nardone A, Nolasco A et al (2021) Radiomic feature reduction approach to predict breast cancer by contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images. Diagnostics 11:684. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11040684
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
La Forgia D, Fanizzi A, Campobasso F, Bellotti R, Didonna V, Lorusso V, Moschetta M, Massafra R, Tam-borra P, Tangaro S et al (2020) Radiomic analysis in contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for predicting breast cancer histological outcome. Diagnostics 10:708. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10090708
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Marino MA, Leithner D, Sung J, Avendano D, Morris EA, Pinker K, Jochelson MS (2020) Radiomics for tumor characterization in breast cancer patients: a feasibility study comparing contrast-enhanced mammography and magnetic reso-nance imaging. Diagnostics 10:492. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10070492
留言 (0)