The Inventory of Problems–29 is a Cross-Culturally Valid Symptom Validity Test: Initial Validation in a Turkish Community Sample

Abeare, C. A., Hurtubise, J., Cutler, L., Sirianni, C., Brantuo, M., Makhzoun, N., & Erdodi, L. (2021). Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(8), 1442–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1779348

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abeare, C. A., An, K., Tyson, B., Holcomb, M., Cutler, L., May, N., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). The Emotion Word Fluency Test as an embedded validity indicator, alone and in multivariate verbal fluency validity composite. Applied Neuropsychology: Child, 11(4), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1939027

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Akca, A. Y. E., Çiller, A., Karataş, E., & Tepedelen, M. S. (2023). Psikolojide Olumsuz Yanıt Yanlılığı, Temaruz ve Belirti Geçerliliği: Türkiye Odaklı Bir Gözden Geçirme [Negative Response Bias, Malingering and Symptom Validity in Psychology: A Türkiye-Focused Review]. Manuscript submitted for publication.

Ali, S., Crisan, I., Abeare, C. A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Cross-cultural performance validity testing: Managing false positives in examinees with limited English proficiency. Developmental Neuropsychology, 47(6), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2022.2105847

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

American Psychiatric Association. (2022). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th, Text Revision ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

An, K. Y., Kaploun, K., Erdodi, L. A., & Abeare, C. A. (2017). Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: A comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1217046

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ardıç, F. C., Köse, S., Solmaz, M., Kulacaoğlu, F., & Balcıoğlu, Y. H. (2019). Reliability, validity, and factorial structure of the Turkish version of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (Turkish SIMS). Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(2), 182–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/24750573.2019.1599237

Article  Google Scholar 

Ayhan, H., & Karaman, H. (2021). Adli Psikolojik Değerlendirmenin Temel İlkeleri: Destekleyici Bir Unsur Olarak Psikolojik Testler [Basic Principles of Forensic Psychological Assessment: Psychological Tests as a Supporting Component]. Uluslararası Türk Kültür Coğrafyasında Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 36–47. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/turksosbilder/issue/64427/937080

Banovic, I., Filippi, F., Viglione, D. J., Scrima, F., Zennaro, A., Zappalà, A., & Giromini, L. (2022). Detecting Coached Feigning of Schizophrenia with the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29) and Its Memory Module (IOP-M): A Simulation Study on a French Community Sample. International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, 21(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14999013.2021.1906798

Article  Google Scholar 

Bosi, J., Minassian, L., Ales, F., Akca, A. Y. E., Winters, C., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., & Giromini, L. (2022). The sensitivity of the IOP-29 and IOP-M to coached feigning of depression and mTBI: An online simulation study in a community sample from the United Kingdom. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2115910

Boskovic, I., Akca, A. Y. E., & Giromini, L. (2022). Symptom coaching and symptom validity tests: An analog study using the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology, Self-Report Symptom Inventory, and Inventory of Problems-29. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2022.2057856

Brantuo, M., An, K., Biss, R., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Neurocognitive profiles associated with limited English proficiency in cognitively intact adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 37(7), 1579–1600. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac019

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-Translation for Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301

Article  Google Scholar 

Brockhaus, R., & Peker, Ö. (2003, July 16–20). Testing effort in Turkish-speaking subjects: Validation of a translation of the Word Memory Test (WMT) Twenty-Sixth Annual International Neuropsychological Society Mid-Year Conference, Berlin, Germany. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318101365_Testing_effort_in_Turkish-speaking_subjects_Validation_of_a_translation_of_the_Word_Memory_Test_WMT

Burchett, D., Dragon, W. R., Smith Holbert, A. M., Tarescavage, A. M., Mattson, C. A., Handel, R. W., & Ben-Porath, Y. S. (2016). “False feigners”: Examining the impact of non-content-based invalid responding on the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form content-based invalid responding indicators. Psychological Assessment, 28(5), 458–470. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000205

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bush, S. S., Heilbronner, R. L., & Ruff, R. M. (2014). Psychological assessment of symptom and performance validity, response bias, and malingering: Official position of the Association for Scientific Advancement in Psychological Injury and Law. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 197–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9198-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Carvalho, L. D. F., Reis, A., Colombarolli, M. S., Pasian, S. R., Miguel, F. K., Erdodi, L. A., Viglione, D. J., & Giromini, L. (2021). Discriminating Feigned from Credible PTSD Symptoms: A Validation of a Brazilian Version of the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 14(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09403-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Chafetz, M., & Underhill, J. (2013). Estimated Costs of Malingered Disability. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(7), 633–639. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act038

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Crișan, I. (2023). English versus native language administration of the IOP-29-M produces similar results in a sample of Romanian bilinguals: A brief report. Psychology & Neuroscience. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000316

Article  Google Scholar 

Crişan, I., Sava, F. A., Maricuţoiu, L. P., Ciumăgeanu, M. D., Axinia, O., Gîrniceanu, L., & Ciotlăuş, L. (2021). Evaluation of various detection strategies in the assessment of noncredible memory performance: Results of two experimental studies. Assessment, 29(8), 1973–1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211040105

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs of neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 28(8), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act073

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erdodi, L., Calamia, M., Holcomb, M., Robinson, A., Rasmussen, L., & Bianchini, K. (2023). M is For Performance Validity: The IOP-M provides a cost-effective measure of the credibility of memory deficits during neuropsychological evaluations. Advance online publication. Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice.

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gegner, J., Erdodi, L. A., Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Bosi, J., & Brusadelli, E. (2021). An Australian study on feigned mTBI using the Inventory of Problems – 29 (IOP-29), its Memory Module (IOP-M), and the Rey Fifteen Item Test (FIT). Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1864375

Giromini, L., Barbosa, F., Coga, G., Azeredo, A., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2020a). Using the inventory of problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) in symptom validity assessment: A study with a Portuguese sample of experimental feigners. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 27(6), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2019.1570929

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Lettieri, S. C., Zizolfi, S., Zizolfi, D., Viglione, D. J., Brusadelli, E., Perfetti, B., di Carlo, D. A., & Zennaro, A. (2019). Beyond Rare-Symptoms Endorsement: A Clinical Comparison Simulation Study Using the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29). Psychological Injury and Law, 12(3), 212–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09357-7

Article  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Pignolo, C., Young, G., Drogin, E. Y., Zennaro, A., & Viglione, D. J. (2021). Comparability and Validity of the Online and In-Person Administrations of the Inventory of Problems-29. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(2), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09406-0

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., & Viglione, D. J. (2022). Assessing Negative Response Bias with the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29): A Quantitative Literature Review. Psychological Injury and Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09437-7

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2018). A Clinical Comparison, Simulation Study Testing the Validity of SIMS and IOP-29 with an Italian Sample. Psychological Injury and Law, 11(4), 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-018-9314-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2020b). An Inventory of Problems–29 Sensitivity Study Investigating Feigning of Four Different Symptom Presentations Via Malingering Experimental Paradigm. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(4), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1566914

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Pignolo, C., & Zennaro, A. (2020c). An Inventory of Problems–29 Study on Random Responding Using Experimental Feigners, Honest Controls, and Computer-Generated Data. Journal of Personality Assessment, 102(6), 731–742. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2019.1639188

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Viglione, D. J., Zennaro, A., Maffei, A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2020d). SVT Meets PVT: Development and initial validation of the Inventory of Problems-Memory (IOP-M). Psychological Injury and Law, 13(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-020-09385-8

Article  Google Scholar 

Giromini, L., Young, G., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Assessing Negative Response Bias Using Self-Report Measures: New Articles. New Issues. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09444-2

Article  Google Scholar 

Gu, W., Reddy, H. B., Green, D., Belfi, B., & Einzig, S. (2017). Inconsistent responding in a criminal forensic setting: An evaluation of the VRIN-r and TRIN-r scales of the MMPI–2–RF. Journal of Personality Assessment, 99(3), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2016.1149483

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hathaway, S. R., & McKinley, J. C. (1943). The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Rev. ed.). University of Minnesota Press.

Holcomb, M., Pyne, S., Cutler, L., Oikle, D. A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Take Their Word for It: The Inventory of Problems Provides Valuable Information on Both Symptom and Performance Validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2114358

Ilgunaite, G., Giromini, L., Bosi, J., Viglione, D. J., & Zennaro, A. (2022). A clinical comparison simulation study using the Inventory of Problems-29 (IOP-29) with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in Lithuania. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(2), 155–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1725518

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Keyvan, A., Ger, M. C., Ertürk, S. G., & Türkcan, A. (2015). The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (M-FAST). Noro Psikiyatr Ars, 52(3), 296–302. https://doi.org/10.5152/npa.2015.7587

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Knoll, J., & Resnick, P. J. (2006). The detection of malingered post-traumatic stress disorder. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 29(3), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psc.2006.04.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S. R., & Meyers, J. E. (2009). 40 Plus or Minus 10, a New Magical Number: Reply to Russell. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(5), 841–849. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040902796735

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lichtenstein, J. D., Flaro, L., Baldwin, F., Rai, J. K., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Further evidence for embedded validity tests in children within the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test – Second Edition. Developmental Neuropsychology, 44(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2019.1565536

Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merckelbach, H., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., van Helvoort, D., Jelicic, M., & Otgaar, H. (2019). When Patients Overreport Symptoms: More Than Just Malingering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 321–326. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419837681

Article 

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif