Left Ventricular Assist Device Outcomes and Strategy 5 Years from Heart Transplant Allocation Score Change

Abstract

Background: The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) adopted new criteria for the heart allocation score on 10/18/2018 to reflect changing trends of candidates' mortality while awaiting transplant. We examined the impact of these policy changes on rates of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and outcomes post-transplant from a relatively newer UNOS database. Methods: The UNOS registry was used to identify heart recipients with LVAD who underwent transplantation between 1/1/2016 and 3/10/2020. Survival data was collected through 3/30/2023. Those listed prior to 10/18/2018 but transplanted after were excluded. Patients were divided into before or after change groups. Demographics and clinical parameters were compared. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. Results: We identified 4599 heart recipients with LVAD in the before (N=3767) and after (N=832) score change eras. The after-group had a lower rate of LVAD implantation while listed compared to the before-group (19.4% vs 34.5%, p<0.0001). There was significantly farther distance from the donor hospital to transplant center in the after-group (259.5 ± 246.8 NM vs 143.2 ± 182.1 NM, p<0.0001) and decreased waitlist days (83.5 ± 103.5 vs 369.0 ± 458.5, p<0.0001). Recipients in the after-group were more likely to receive a CDC increased-risk donor organ (37.5% vs 30.2%, p=0.0002). Survival at 5-years was significantly reduced in the after-group (60.5% vs 78.9%, p<0.0001). Conclusions: The allocation score change in 2018 yielded considerable changes in mechanical circulatory support device implantation strategy and survival. The rate of LVAD implantation decreased with profoundly worse 5-year survival, showing further divergence from prior short-term post-transplant data.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Temple University Human Research Protection Program (HRPP) Email: irb@temple.edu Phone: 215-707-3390

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the United Network for Organ Sharing

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif