Vibrans H, Casas A, Vibrans H, Casas A. Roads traveled and roads ahead: the consolidation of Mexican ethnobotany in the new millennium. An essay. Bot Sci. 2022;100:263–89.

Article  Google Scholar 

Shneider AM. Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist. Trends Biochem Sci. 2009;34:217–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2009.02.002.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970.

Google Scholar 

Martin GJ, Ethnobotany A. A methods manual. London: Chapaman and Hill; 1995. p. 1–251.

Google Scholar 

Alexiades MN, Sheldon JW. Selected guidelines for ethnobotanical research: a field manual. New York: Botanical Garden; 1996.

Google Scholar 

Begossi A. Use of ecological methods in ethnobotany: diversity indices. Econ Bot. 1996;50:280–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02907333.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gaoue OG, Coe MA, Bond M, Hart G, Seyler BC, McMillen H. Theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany. Econ Bot. 2017;71:269–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Júnior WS, Albuquerque UP, Medeiros PM. Reflections on the use of hypotheses in ethnobotany: a response to Leonti et al. (2020). Ethnobot Res Appl. 2021;21:1–5.

Google Scholar 

Leonti M, Casu L, de Oliveira Martins DT, Rodrigues E, Benítez G. Ecological theories and major hypotheses in ethnobotany: their relevance for ethnopharmacology and pharmacognosy in the context of historical data. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2020;30:451–66.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hunn E. Ethnobiology in four phases. J Ethnobiol. 2007;27(1):1.

Article  Google Scholar 

Wolverton S. Ethnobiology 5: interdisciplinarity in an era of rapid environmental change. Ethnobiol Lett. 2013;4:21–5.

Article  Google Scholar 

McAlvay AC, Armstrong CG, Baker J, Elk LB, Bosco S, Hanazaki N, Joseph L, Martínez-Cruz TE, Nesbitt M, Palmer MA, Priprá de Almeida WC. Ethnobiology phase VI: decolonizing institutions, projects, and scholarship. J Ethnobiol. 2021;41(2):170–91.

Article  Google Scholar 

Svanberg I, Łuczaj Ł, Pardo-De-Santayana M, Pieroni A, Anderson E, et al. History and current trends of ethnobiological research in Europe. In: Anderson E, et al., editors. Ethnobiology. Hoboken: Wiley; 2011.

Google Scholar 

Portilla ML. Bernardino de Sahagún, first anthropologist. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press; 2002.

Google Scholar 

Zhu YP, Woerdenbag HJ. Traditional Chinese herbal medicine. Pharm World Sci. 1995;17:103–12.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wolff P, Medin DL, Pankratz C. Evolution and devolution of folkbiological knowledge. Cognition. 1999;73(2):177–204.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bromham L, Dinnage R, Skirgård H, Ritchie A, Cardillo M, Meakins F, Greenhill S, Hua X. Global predictors of language endangerment and the future of linguistic diversity. Nat Ecol Evol. 2022;6(2):163–73.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Harrison KD. When languages die: the extinction of the world’s languages and the erosion of human knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

Book  Google Scholar 

Pignone D, Laghetti G. On sweet acorn (Quercus spp.) cake tradition in Italian cultural and ethnic islands. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2010;57(8):1261–6.

Article  Google Scholar 

Pieroni A, Hovsepyan R, Manduzai AK, Sõukand R. Wild food plants traditionally gathered in central Armenia: archaic ingredients or future sustainable foods? Environ Dev Sustain. 2021;23(2):2358–81.

Article  Google Scholar 

Svanberg I, Łuczaj Ł. Pioneers in European ethnobiology. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. 2014.

Kalle R, Sõukand R, Pieroni A. Devil is in the details: use of wild food plants in historical Võromaa and Setomaa, present-day Estonia. Foods. 2020;9(5):570.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pardo-de-Santayana M, Morales R, Aceituno-Mata L, Molina M, editors. Inventario Español de los Conocimientos Tradicionales relativos a la Biodiversidad. Priemra fase: introducción, metodología y fichas. Madrid: MAGRAMA; 2014.

Google Scholar 

Balick MJ. Traditional knowledge: lessons from the past, lessons for the future earthscan, London-stirling. In: McManis CR, editor. Biodiversity and the law intellectual property, biotechnology and traditional knowledge. London: Earthscan; 2007. p. 280–96.

Google Scholar 

Svanberg I. Folk knowledge of an individual plant specimen: the case of the royal fern (Osmunda regalis L.) in Virestad Parish, Småland, Sweden. Ethnobiol Lett. 2012;3:63–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Babai D, Molnár Á, Molnár Z. Ahogygondozza, úgy veszi hasznát” Hagyományos ökológiai tudás és gazdálkodás Gyimesben/Traditional ecological knowledge and land use in Gyimes (Eastern Carpathians). Budapest: Hungarian Academy of Sciences; 2014.

Google Scholar 

Boas F. Ethnology of the Kwakiutl. In: Thirty-fifth annual report of the Bureau of American Ethnology. 1913–1914, p. 43–794.

Pratt MG. Fitting oval pegs into round holes: tensions in evaluating and publishing qualitative research in top-tier North American journals. Organ Res Methods. 2008;11(3):481–509.

Article  Google Scholar 

Deloria V. Custer died for your sins: an Indian manifesto. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Press; 1969.

Google Scholar 

Tsing AL. The Mushroom at the end of the world. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2015.

Book  Google Scholar 

Native American Ethnobotany Database. http://naeb.brit.org/.

Feyerabend P. Against method; Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: NLB [New Left Books]; 1975.

Google Scholar 

Steward JH. Theory of culture change: the methodology of multilinear evolution. Champaign: University of Illinois Press; 1972.

Google Scholar 

Harris M. Cultural materialism: the struggle for a science of culture. Lanham: AltaMira Press; 2001.

Google Scholar 

Łuczaj Ł, Jug-Dujaković M, Dolina K, Jeričević M, Vitasović-Kosić I. The ethnobotany and biogeography of wild vegetables in the Adriatic islands. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019;15:1–7.

Article  Google Scholar