Hess E, Polt J. Pupil size in relation to mental activity during simple problem-solving. Science. 1964;143(3611):1190–2. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.143.3611.1190.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kahneman D, Beatty J. Pupil diameter and load on memory. Science. 1966;154(3756):1583–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.154.3756.1583.

Article  Google Scholar 

Granholm E, Asarnow RF, Sarkin AJ, Dykes KL. Pupillary responses index cognitive resource limitations. Psychophysiology. 1996;33(4):457–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1996.tb01071.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cesana-Arlotti N, Varga B, Téglás E. The pupillometry of the possible: an investigation of infants’ representation of alternative possibilities. Philos Trans R Soc B. 2022;377(1866):20210343. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0343.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dietz J, Bradley MM, Okun MS, Bowers D. Emotion and ocular responses in Parkinson’s disease. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(12):3247–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.07.029.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ariel R, Castel AD. Eyes wide open: enhanced pupil dilation when selectively studying important information. Exp Brain Res. 2014;232:337–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-013-3744-5.

Article  Google Scholar 

Heaver B, Hutton SB. Keeping an eye on the truth? Pupil size changes associated with recognition memory. Memory. 2011;19(4):398–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2011.575788.

Article  Google Scholar 

Kuchinsky SE, Ahlstrom JB, Vaden KI Jr, Cute SL, Humes LE, Dubno JR, et al. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. Psychophysiology. 2013;50(1):23–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01477.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schmidtke J. Second language experience modulates word retrieval effort in bilinguals: evidence from pupillometry. Front Psychol. 2014;5:137. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00137.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ellingsen DM, Wessberg J, Chelnokova O, Olausson H, Laeng B, Leknes S. In touch with your emotions: oxytocin and touch change social impressions while others’ facial expressions can alter touch. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;39:11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.09.017.

Article  Google Scholar 

Baddeley A. Working memory. Science. 1992;255:556–9. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1736359.

Article  Google Scholar 

Baddeley AD, Hitch G. Working memory. In: Bower GA, editor. Psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press; 1974. pp. 47–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Banken JA. Clinical utility of considering digits forward and digits backward as separate components of the wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised. J Clin Psychol. 1985;41(5):686–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4679(198509)41:5%3C686::AID-JCLP2270410517%3E3.0.CO;2-D.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ryan JJ, Lopez SJ, Paolo AM. Digit-span performance of persons 75–96 years of age: base rates and associations with selected demographic variables. Psychol Assess. 1996;8(3):324.

Article  Google Scholar 

Suwartono C, Halim M, Hidajat L, Hendriks M, Kessels R. Development and reliability of the indonesian Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV). Psychol. 2014;5:1611–19. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.514171.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hester R, Kinsella G, Ong B. Effect of age on forward and backward span tasks. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004;10(4):475–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617704104037.

Article  Google Scholar 

Orsini A, Chiacchio L, Cinque M, Cocchiaro C, Schiappa O, Grossi D. Effects of age, education and sex on two tests of immediate memory: a study of normal subjects from 20 to 99 years of age. Percept Mot Skills. 1986;63(2):727–32. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.63.2.727.

Article  Google Scholar 

Waters GS, Caplan D. Age, working memory, and on-line syntactic processing in sentence comprehension. Psychol Aging. 2001;16(1):128–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.16.1.128.

Article  Google Scholar 

Johnson EL, Miller Singley AT, Peckham AD, Johnson SL, Bunge SA. Task-evoked pupillometry provides a window into the development of short-term memory capacity. Front Psychol. 2014;5:218. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00218.

Article  Google Scholar 

Piquado T, Isaacowitz D, Wingfield A. Pupillometry as a measure of cognitive effort in younger and older adults. Psychophysiology. 2010;47(3):560–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00947.x.

Article  Google Scholar 

Granholm EL, Panizzon MS, Elman JA, Jak AJ, Hauger RL, Bondi MW, et al. Pupillary responses as a biomarker of early risk for Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;56(4):1419–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-161078.

Article  Google Scholar 

Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56(3):303–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.56.3.303.

Article  Google Scholar 

Martin N, Kohen F, Kalinyak-Fliszar M. A diagnostic battery to assess language and short-term memory deficits in aphasia, Clin Aphasiology Paper. 2008. http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/id/eprint/1944.

Sung JE. Performances on short-term and working memory tasks and their relationships to aphasia severity and auditory comprehension in normal elderly adults and people with aphasia. Commun Sci Disord. 2010;15(3):285–97.

Google Scholar 

Wingfield A, Stine EA, Lahar CJ, Aberdeen JS. Does the capacity of working memory change with age? Exp Aging Res. 1988;14(2):103–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610738808259731.

Article  Google Scholar 

Christensen K, Multhaup K, Nordstrom S, Voss K. A cognitive battery for dementia: development and measurement characteristics. Psychol Assessment: J Clin Psychol. 1991;3(2):168. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.3.2.168.

Article  Google Scholar 

Humes LE. What is normal hearing for older adults and can normal-hearing older adults benefit from hearing care intervention? Hear Rev. 2020;27(7):12–8.

Google Scholar 

Yeom TH, Park YS, Oh KJ, Kim JK, Lee YH. A manual for K-WAIS. Seoul: Korean Guidance Press; 1992. pp. 105–70.

Google Scholar 

Sung JE. The reliability and validity of short-term and Working Memory pointing tasks developed for clinical populations with Speech and Language Disorders. Commun Sci Disord. 2011;16(2):185–201.

Google Scholar 

Seo SK. Yonsei corpus of lexical frequency in korean vocabulary. Seoul: Yonsei University Institute of Language and Information Studies Press; 1998.

Google Scholar 

Govender A, King S. Using pupillometry to measure the cognitive load of synthetic speech. System. 2018;50:2838–42. https://doi.org/10.21437/Interspeech.2018-1174.

Article  Google Scholar 

van Rij J, Hendriks P, van Rijn H, Baayen RH, Wood SN. Analyzing the Time Course of Pupillometric Data. Trends in Hearing. 2019;23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216519832483.

Mannaru P, Balasingam B, Pattipati K, Sibley C, Coyne JT. Performance evaluation of the gazepoint GP3 eye tracking device based on pupil dilation. Int. Conf. Augmented cognition. Switzerland AG: Springer Press; 2017. 166–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58628-1.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Caplan D, Waters G. The relationship between age, processing speed, working memory capacity, and language comprehension. Memory. 2005;13(3–4):403–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210344000459.

Article  Google Scholar 

Salthouse TA. The aging of working memory. Neuropsychol. 1994;8(4):535–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.8.4.535.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cowan N, Elliott EM, Saults JS, Morey CC, Mattox S, Hismjatullina A, et al. On the capacity of attention: its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cogn Psychol. 2005;51(1):42–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2004.12.001.

Article  Google Scholar 

Craik FIM, Jennings JM. Human memory. In: Craik FIM, Salthouse TA, editors. The handbook of aging and cognition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc; 1992. pp. 51–110.

Light LL. Memory and aging: four hypotheses in search of data. Annu Rev Psychol. 1991;42:333–76. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.42.020191.002001.

Article  Google Scholar 

Salthouse TA. The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychol Rev. 1996;103(3):403–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.403.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eom BR, Oh SJ, Sung JE. Task-specific effects on performance of working memory measures and their relationship to aphasia severity in people with aphasia. J Speech lang hear Disord. 2016;25(2):113–22.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jones G, Macken B. Questioning short-term memory and its measurement: why digit-span measures long-term associative learning. Cognition. 2015;144:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.07.009.

Article  Google Scholar 

Just MA, Carpenter PA. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychol rev. 1992;99(1):122. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.

Article  Google Scholar