ARDILA, R. (1992). Toward unity in psychology: The experimental synthesis of behavior. In: «International Journal of Psychology», vol. XXVII, n. 5, pp. 299-310.

BAARS, B.J. (1986). The cognitive revolution in psychology, The Guilford Press, New York/London.

BAARS, J.B. (1985). The logic of unification. In: «Contemporary Psychology», vol. XXX, n. 4, p. 340.

BAUM, C. (2016). Stabilizing cognition: An STS approach to the Sloan Foundation report. In: «Theory and Psychology», vol. XXVI, n. 6, pp. 773-787.

BECHTEL, W., ABRAHAMSEN, A., GRAHAM, G. (1998). The life of cognitive science. In: W. BECHTEL, P. GRAHAM (eds.), A companion to cognitive science, Blackwell, Malden/Oxford, pp. 1-104.

BOBRYK, J. (2002). The social construction of mind and the future of cognitive science. In: «Foundations of Science», vol. VII, pp. 481-495.

BODEN, M.A. (2006). Mind as machine. A history of cognitive science, vol. I, Oxford University Press, Ox-ford/New York.

BOONE, W., PICCININI, G. (2016). The cognitive neuroscience revolution. In: «Synthese», vol. CXCIII, n. 5, pp. 1509-1534.

BRISKMAN, L.B. (1972). Is a Kuhnian analysis applicable to psychology?. In: «Science Studies», vol. II, n. 1, pp. 87-97.

BRUNER, J. (1984). Notes on the cognitive revolution. In: «Interchanges», vol. XV, n. 1, pp. 1-8.

BUCKNER, C., FRIDLAND, E. (2017). What is cognition? Angsty monism, permissive pluralism(s), and the future of cognitive science. In: «Synthese», vol. CXCIV, n. 4, pp. 4191-4195.

GARDNER, H. (1985). The mind’s new science. A history of the cognitive revolution, Basic Books, New York.

GLEMBERG, A.M., WITT, J.K., METCALFE, J. (2013). From revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. In: «Perspective on Psychological Science», vol. VIII, n. 5, pp. 573-585.

GREEN, C.D. (1996). Where did the word “cognitive” come from anyway?. In: «Canadian Psychology», vol. XXXVII, n. 1, pp. 31-39.

GREENWOOD, C.D. (1999). Understanding the cognitive revolution in psychology. In: «Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences», vol. XXXV, n. 1, pp. 1-22.

HENRIQUES, G. (2003). The tree of knowledge system and the theoretical unification in psychology. In: «Review of General Psychology», vol. VII, n. 2, pp. 150-182.

HENRIQUES, G. (2004). Psychology defined. In: «Journal of Clinical Psychology», vol. LX, n. 12, pp. 1207-1221.

KEYSER, S.J., MILLER, G.A., WALKER, E. (1978). Cognitive science – 1978: Report of the state of the art committee to the advisers of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

KRANTZ, D.L. (1987). Psychology’s search for the unity. In: «New Ideas in Psychology», vol. V, n. 3, pp. 329-339.

LONGUET-HIGGINS, H.C. (1973). Comment by professor H.C. Longuet-Higgins on Lighthill report. In: Artificial intelligence. Lighthill report 1973: A paper symposium, document available at URL: https://rodsmith.nz/wp-content/uploads/Lighthill_1973_Report.pdf

MARR, D. (1982). Vision. A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information, Freeman & co., San Francisco (CA).

MILLER, G.A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. In: «Trends in Cognitive Sciences», vol. VII, n. 3, pp. 141-144.

NEISSER, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology, Appleton Century-Crofts, New York.

NEWELL, A. (1982). The knowledge model. In: «Artificial Intelligence», vol. XVIII, n. 1, pp. 87-127.

NEWELL, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition, Harvard University Press.

O’DONOHUE, W., FERGUSON, K.E., NAUGLE, A.E. (2003). The structure of the cognitive revolution: An examination from the philosophy of science. In: «The Behavior Analyst», vol. XXVI, n. 1, pp. 85-110.

PALERMO, D.S. (1971). Is a scientific revolution taking place in psychology?. In: «Science Studies», vol. I, n. 1, pp. 135-155.

PYLYSHYN, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition. Toward a foundation for cognitive science, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

ROSENZWEIG, M.R. (1992). Unity and diversity of psychology. In: «International Journal of Psychology», vol. XXVII, n. 5, pp. 283-290.

STAATS, L.A.W. (1983). Psychology’s crisis of disunity: Philosophy and method for a unified science, Praeger, New York.

STAATS, L.A.W. (1985). Disunity’s prisoners, blind to a new approach to unification. In: «Contemporary Psychology», vol. XXX, n. 4, pp. 339-340.

STANOVICH, K. (2001). How to think straight about psychology, Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 6th edition.

STURM, T., GUNDLACH, H. (2013). Zur Geschichte und Geschichtsschreibung der >kognitiven Revolution<. In: A. STEPHAN, S. WALTER (Hrgs.), Handbuch Kognitionswissenschaft, J.B. Metzler Verlag, Stuttgart/Weimar, pp. 7-21.

VILLALOBOS, M. (2013). Enactive cognitive science: Revisionism or revolution?. In: «Adaptive Behavior», vol. XXI, n. 3, pp. 159-167.

VILLALOBOS, M., SILVERMAN, D. (2018). Extended functionalism, radical enactivism, and the autopoietic theory of cognition: prospects for a full revolution in cognitive science. In: «Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences», vol. XVII, n. 4, pp. 719-739.

WALTER, S., STEPHAN, A. (2013). Einleitung. In: A. STEPHAN, S. WALTER (Hrsg.), Handbuch Kognitionswissenschaft, J.B. Metzler Verlag, Stuttgart/Weimar, pp. 1-5.

WERTZ, F.J. (1999). Multiple methods in psychology: Epistemological grounding and the possibility of unity. In: «Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology», vol. XIX, n. 2, pp. 131-166.

WILLIAMS, D., COLLING, L. (2018). From symbols to icons: The return of resemblance in the cognitive neuroscience revolution. In: «Synthese», vol. CXCV, n. 5, pp. 1941-1967.