Psychology is – and should be – central to cognitive science

CHOI, B.C.K., PAK, A.W.P. (2006). Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. In: «Clinical and Investigative Medicine», vol. XXIX, n. 6, pp. 51-364.

CHOMSKY, N. (1966). Aspects of the theory of syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge (MA).

COLLINS, A. (1977). Why cognitive science?. In: «Cognitive Science», vol. I, n. 1, pp. 1-2.

COLTHEART, M., DAVIES, M. (2021). Failure of hypothesis evaluation as a factor in delusional belief. In: «Cognitive Neuropsychiatry», vol. XXVI, n. 4, pp. 213-230.

COOPER, R. (2019). Multidisciplinary flux and multiple research traditions within cognitive science. In: «Topics in Cognitive Science», vol. XI, n. 4, pp. 869-879.

DALE, R. (2021). The mindset of cognitive science. In: «Cognitive Science», vol. XLV, n. 4, Art.Nr. e12952 - doi: 10.1111/cogs.12952.

FODOR, J.A., GARRETT, M., BEVER, T.G. (1968). Some syntactic determinants of sentential complexity. II: Verb structure. In: «Perception and Psychophysics», vol. III, n. 6, pp. 453-461.

FRENCH, R.M. (2019) Missing the forest for the trees: Why cognitive science circa 2019 is alive and well. In: «Topics in Cognitive Science», vol. XI, n. 4, pp. 880-883.

GARDNER, H. (1987). The mind’s new science: A history of the cognitive revolution, Basic Books, New York.

GENTNER, D. (2010). Psychology in cognitive science: 1978-2038. In: «Topics in Cognitive Science», vol. II, n. 3, pp. 328-344.

GENTNER, D. (2019). Cognitive science is and should be pluralistic. In: «Topics in Cognitive Science», vol. XI, n. 4, pp. 884-891.

GOEL, A. (2019). A cognitive reformation. In: «Topics in Cognitive Science», vol. XI, n. 4, pp. 892-901.

HENRICH, J., HEINE, S.J., NORENZAYAN, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. In: «Behavioral and Brain Sciences», vol. XXXIII, n. 2-3, 2010, pp. 61-83.

HOFMANN, T., SCHOLKOPF, B., SMOLA, A.J. (2008). Kernel methods in machine learning. In: «The Annals of Statistics», vol. XXXVI pp. 1171-1220.

NUÑEZ, R., ALLEN, M., GAO, R., MILLER RIGOLI, C.G., RELAFORD-DOYLE, J., SEMENUKS, A. (2019). What happened to cognitive science?. In: «Nature Human Behaviour», vol. III, n. 8, pp. 782-791.

NUÑEZ, R., ALLEN, M., GAO, R., MILLER RIGOLI, C.G., RELAFORD-DOYLE, J., SEMENUKS, A. (2020). For the sciences they are a-changin’: A response to commentaries on Nuñez et al.’s (2019) “What happened to cognitive science?”. In: «Topics in Cognitive Science», vol. XII, n. 3, pp. 790-803.

ROSENBLOOM, P.S., FORBUS, K.D. (2019). Expanding and repositioning cognitive science. In: «Topics in Cognitive Science», vol. XI, n. 4, pp. 918-927.

STONE, T., YOUNG, A.W. (1997). Delusions and brain injury: The philosophy and psychology of belief. In: «Mind and Language», vol. XII, n. 3-4, pp. 327-364.

THAGARD, P. (2023). Cognitive science. In: E.N. ZALTA (ed.), Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall edition, 1996; substantive revision, 2023, Winter edition – URL: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ cognitive-science/

WOOD, S.M.W., WOOD, J.N. (2021). Distorting face representations in newborn brains. In: «Cognitive Science», vol. XLV, n. 8, Art. Nr. e13021 – doi: 10.1111/cogs.13021.

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif