American Educational Research Association American Psychological Association National Council on Measurement in Education, & Joint Committee on Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing (U.S.). (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association.

Google Scholar 

American Psychological Association. (2013). Specialty guidelines for forensic psychology. American Psychologist, 68, 7–19.

Article  Google Scholar 

American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct (2002, amended effective June 1, 2010, and January 1, 2017). Retrieved 9 Nov 2021 from. https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/

British Psychological Society. (2009). Assessment of effort in clinical testing of cognitive functioning for adults. Leicester, UK: Author

Bush, S. S., Heilbronner, R. L., & Ruff, R. M. (2014). Psychological assessment of symptom and performance validity, response bias, and malingering: Official position of the Association for Scientific Advancement in Psychological Injury and Law. Psychological Injury and Law, 7, 197–205.

Article  Google Scholar 

Bush, S. S., & Martin, T. A. (guest editors) (2006). Special issue: Ethical controversies in neuropsychology. Applied Neuropsychology, 13 (2).

Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Tröster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., Reynolds, C. R., & Silver, C. H. (National Academy of Neuropsychology Policy & Planning Committee). (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity. Official position of the National Academy of Neuropsychology. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20 (4), 419–426.

Carone, D., & Bush, S. S. (Eds.). (2013). Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering. Springer Publishing Co.

Google Scholar 

Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (1993). 509 U.S. 579.

General Electric v. Joiner. (1997). 118 S.Ct. 512. U.S. Supreme Court.

Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Millis, S., & Participants, C. (2009). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

House of Representatives, Committee on the Judiciary. (2002). Federal rules of evidence. U.S. Government Printing Office.

Google Scholar 

Kaufman, N. K., & Bush, S. S. (2021). Ethical issues in assessing malingering in head injury litigation. In A.M. Horton & C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), Detection of malingering during head injury litigation, 3rd edition (pp. 157–176). Zug, Switzerland: Springer Nature.

Kaufmann, N. K., Bush, S. S., Schneider, N., & Hicks, S. J. (2022). Forensic mental health assessment in criminal contexts: Key concepts and cases. Routledge/Taylor & Francis.

Book  Google Scholar 

Kumho Tire Company Ltd. V. Carmichael. (1999). 526 U.S. 137 U.S. Supreme Court

Lamberty, G. J., Bush, S. S., Adams, K. M., Tart-Zelvin, A., & Bieliauskas, L. A. (2022). Historical origins of professional neuropsychology organizations in the United States. In W. Barr & L. A. Bieliauskas (Eds.), Oxford handbook of the history of clinical neuropsychology (pp. C26.P1-C26-N8). Oxford University Press.

Lees-Haley, P. R., & Fox, D. D. (2001). Isn’t everything in forensic neuropsychology controversial? NeuroRehabilitation, 16, 267–273.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Leonhard, C. (2022a). Review of statistical and methodological issues in the forensic prediction of malingering from validity tests: Part I: Statistical issues. Neuropsychology Review.

Leonhard, C. (2022b). Review of statistical and methodological issues in the forensic prediction of malingering from validity tests: Part II: Methodological issues. Neuropsychology Review.

Martelli, M. F., & Zasler, N. D. (2001). Controversies in neuropsychology: Editorial message. NeuroRehabilitation, 16, 195–197.

Article  Google Scholar 

Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29, 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Booner, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., Suhr, J. A., & Participants, C. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35, 1053–1106.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar