Chu SP, Kelsey JL, Keegan TH, Sternfeld B, Prill M, Quesenberry CP, et al. Risk factors for proximal humerus fracture. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;160(4):360–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Calvo E, Morcillo D, Foruria AM, Redondo-Santamaria E, Osorio-Picorne F, Caeiro JR. Nondisplaced proximal humeral fractures: high incidence among outpatient-treated osteoporotic fractures and severe impact on upper extremity function and patient subjective health perception. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2011;20(5):795–801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2010.09.008.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Neer CS, 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1077–89.

Neer CS, 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1090–103.

Foruria AM, de Gracia MM, Larson DR, Munuera L, Sanchez-Sotelo J. The pattern of the fracture and displacement of the fragments predict the outcome in proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(3):378–86. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B3.25083.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Court-Brown CM, Garg A, McQueen MM. The epidemiology of proximal humeral fractures. Acta Orthop Scand. 2001;72(4):365–71.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Foruria AM, Marti M, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Proximal humeral fractures treated conservatively settle during fracture healing. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(2):e24-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000244.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Handoll HH, Keding A, Corbacho B, Brealey SD, Hewitt C, Rangan A. Five-year follow- up results of the PROFHER trial comparing operative and non-operative treatment of adults with a displaced fracture of the proximal humerus. Bone Joint J. 2017;99- b(3):383–92. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.99b3.bjj-2016-1028.

• Lopiz Y, Alcobia-Diaz B, Galan-Olleros M, Garcia-Fernandez C, Picado AL, Marco F. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty versus nonoperative treatment for 3- or 4-part proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a prospective randomized controlled trial. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2019.06.024. This study suggests minimal benefits of RSA over nonoperative treatment for displaced 3- and 4-part PHFs. At short-term follow-up, the main advantage of RSA appeared to be less pain perception.

Neviaser AS, Hettrich CM, Beamer BS, Dines JS, Lorich DG. Endosteal strut augment reduces complications associated with proximal humeral locking plates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(12):3300–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1949-0.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schliemann B, Seifert R, Rosslenbroich SB, Theisen C, Wahnert D, Raschke MJ, et al. Screw augmentation reduces motion at the bone-implant interface: a biomechanical study of locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2015;24(12):1968–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2015.06.028.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):233–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, Feeley BT. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures. Injury. 2011;42(4):408–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.058.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, Limb D, Giannoudis P. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(6):837–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.004.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sudkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, Voigt C, Oestern H, Kaab M et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1320–8. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.H.00006.

Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, Heuwinkel R, Hafner C, Rillmann P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2009;23(3):163–72.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Schnetzke M, Bockmeyer J, Porschke F, Studier-Fischer S, Grutzner PA, Guehring T. Quality of reduction influences outcome after locked-plate fixation of proximal humeral type-C fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98(21):1777–85. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.00112. This study showed better outcome, less complications and a tendency to less revision surgeries in anatomically or acceptable reduced proximal humeral fractures inviolving the anatomic neck, as opposed to malreduced ones.

Meier RA, Messmer P, Regazzoni P, Rothfischer W, Gross T. Unexpected high complication rate following internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an angled blade plate. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20(4):253–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rose PS, Adams CR, Torchia ME, Jacofsky DJ, Haidukewych GG, Steinmann SP. Locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures: initial results with a new implant. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(2):202–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.06.006.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Smith AM, Mardones RM, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Early complications of operatively treated proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16(1):14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2006.05.008.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Egol KA, Ong CC, Walsh M, Jazrawi LM, Tejwani NC, Zuckerman JD. Early complications in proximal humerus fractures (OTA Types 11) treated with locked plates. J Orthop Trauma. 2008;22(3):159–64. https://doi.org/10.1097/BOT.0b013e318169ef2a.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, Paiement GD. Surgical treatment of three and four- part proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(7):1689–97.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Thalhammer G, Platzer P, Oberleitner G, Fialka C, Greitbauer M, Vecsei V. Angular stable fixation of proximal humeral fractures. J Trauma. 2009;66(1):204–10.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavert P, Adam P, Bevort A, Bonnomet F, Kempf JF. Pitfalls and complications with locking plate for proximal humerus fracture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2010;19(4):489–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2009.09.005.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Charalambous CP, Siddique I, Valluripalli K, Kovacevic M, Panose P, Srinivasan M, et al. Proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127(3):205–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-006-0256-9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hirschmann MT, Quarz V, Audige L, Ludin D, Messmer P, Regazzoni P, et al. Internal fixation of unstable proximal humerus fractures with an anatomically preshaped interlocking plate: a clinical and radiologic evaluation. J Trauma. 2007;63(6):1314–23. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000240457.64628.38.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erhardt JB, Roderer G, Grob K, Forster TN, Stoffel K, Kuster MS. Early results in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with a polyaxial locking plate. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2009;129(10):1367–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-009-0924-7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Chivot M, Lami D, Bizzozero P, Galland A, Argenson JN. Three- and four-part displaced proximal humeral fractures in patients older than 70 years: reverse shoulder arthroplasty or nonsurgical treatment? J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(2):252–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.07.019. This study suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures with 3-part or 4-part displaced fragments in elderly patients provides slightly better functional outcomes than does nonsurgical treatment, so this solution must be proposed only to patients who have a significant functional demand.

Hengg C, Nijs S, Klopfer T, Jaeger M, Platz A, Pohlemann T, et al. Cement augmentation of the proximal humerus internal locking system in elderly patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2019;139(7):927–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-019-03142-6.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Siebenburger G, Helfen T, Biermann N, Haasters F, Bocker W, Ockert B. Screw-tip augmentation versus standard locked plating of displaced proximal humeral fractures: a retrospective comparative cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019;28(7):1326–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2018.12.001.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cha H, Park KB, Oh S, Jeong J. Treatment of comminuted proximal humeral fractures using locking plate with strut allograft. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(5):781–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2016.09.055.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Foruria AM, Martinez-Catalan N, Valencia M, Morcillo D, Calvo E. Proximal humeral fracture locking plate fixation with anatomic reduction, and a short and cemented screws configuration, dramatically reduces the implant related failure rate in elderly patients. JSES International. 2021; In Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseint.2021.06.004. This study showed minimal fixation failure rates when locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures is performed following specific principles of fixation and a step-by-step surgical tecnique. It also suggested an association between valgus impaction fracture patterns and the development of global avascular necrosis in this population.

Goch AM, Christiano A, Konda SR, Leucht P, Egol KA. Operative repair of proximal humerus fractures in septuagenarians and octogenarians: does chronologic age matter? J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017;8(1):50–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.01.006.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Foruria AM, Sanchez-Sotelo J. Proximal humeral fractures. In: P. T, M. RW, R.F. O, McQueen MM, McKee MD, Court-Brown CM, editors. Rockwood and Greens’s Fractures in Adults. Ninth ed.: Wolters Kluver; 2020. p. 1134–230.

Miquel J, Martinez R, Santana F, Marimon P, Torrens C. Surgical treatment of proximal humeral fractures with the transosseous suture fixation. J Orthop Surg Res. 2021;16(1):405. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02555-7.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

• Trikha V, Singh V, Choudhury B, Das S. Retrospective analysis of proximal humeral fracture-dislocations managed with locked plates. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017;26(10):e293-e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.035. This study showed a good functional outcome in the majority of cases after fixation with locking plates of 33 proximal humerus fracture dislocations in patients less than 60 years old.

• Helfen T, Siebenburger G, Fleischhacker E, Gleich J, Bocker W, Ockert B. Operative treatment of 2-part surgical neck type fractures of the proximal humerus in the elderly: cement augmented locking plate PHILOS vs. proximal humerus nail multiloc(R). Injury. 2020;51(10):2245–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2020.06.026. This study did not find differences in outcome or complication rates after locking plate fixation vs third generation intramedullary nailing in patiens over 60-year-old. Both implants reached good outcomes with low complication rates if anatomic fracture reduction and accurate implant position was achieved.

Bai L, Fu ZG, Wang TB, Chen JH, Zhang PX, Zhang DY, et al. Radiological evaluation of reduction loss in unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(3):271–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2013.12.024.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jung SW, Shim SB, Kim HM, Lee JH, Lim HS. Factors that influence reduction loss in proximal humerus fracture surgery. J Orthop Trauma. 2015;29(6):276–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000000252.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

• Varga P, Inzana JA, Fletcher JWA, Hofmann-Fliri L, Runer A, Sudkamp NP et al. Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling: augmenting proximal humerus fracture plating. Bone Joint Res. 2020;9(9):534–42. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.99.BJR-2020-0053.R1. This study provides a computational model in which cement augmentation of calcar screws provides the strongest fixation. However, other clinical studies showed high rates of intra-articular cement leaking when these screws are augmented, so it results should be interpreted cautiously.

Katthagen JC, Lutz O, Voigt C, Lill H, Ellwein A. Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures. Obere Extrem. 2018;13(2):123–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-018-0440-x.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Knierzinger D, Crepaz-Eger U, Hengg C, Kralinger F. Does cement augmentation of the screws in angular stable plating for proximal humerus fractures influence the radiological outcome: a retrospective assessment. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020;140(10):1413–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03362-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central