Goldberg J.L. Kirnaz S. Carnevale J.A. et al.

History of navigation guided spine surgery.

in: 1st edition. Technical advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. vol. 1. Springer Nature, Singapore: 3-10Nerland U.S. Jakola A.S. Solheim O. et al.

Minimally invasive decompression versus open laminectomy for central stenosis of the lumbar spine: pragmatic comparative effectiveness study.

BMJ. 350: h1603Imada A. Huynh T.R. Drazin D.

Minimally invasive versus open laminectomy/discectomy, transforaminal lumbar, and posterior lumbar interbody fusions: a systematic review.

Cureus. 9https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1488Good C.R. Orosz L. Schroerlucke S.R. et al.

Complications and revision rates in minimally invasive robotic-guided versus fluoroscopic-guided spinal fusions: the mis refresh prospective comparative study.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 46: 1661-1668Tian N.F. Wu Y.S. Zhang X.L. et al.

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence.

Eur Spine J. 22: 1741-1749Rawicki N. Dowdell J.E. Sandhu H.S.

Current state of navigation in spine surgery.

Ann Transl Med. 9https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1335Hussain I. Navarro-Ramirez R. Lang G. et al.

3D Navigation-guided resection of giant ventral cervical intradural schwannoma with 360-degree stabilization.

Clin Spine Surg. 31: E257-E265Navarro-Ramirez R. Lang G. Lian X. et al.

Total navigation in spine surgery; a concise guide to eliminate fluoroscopy using a portable intraoperative computed tomography 3-dimensional navigation system.

World Neurosurg. 100: 325-335Janssen I. Lang G. Navarro-Ramirez R. et al.

Can fan-beam interactive computed tomography accurately predict indirect decompression in minimally invasive spine surgery fusion procedures?.

World Neurosurg. 107: 322-333Kim C.W. Lee Y.P. Taylor W. et al.

Use of navigation-assisted fluoroscopy to decrease radiation exposure during minimally invasive spine surgery.

Spine J. 8: 584-590Kraus M.D. Krischak G. Keppler P. et al.

Can computer-assisted surgery reduce the effective dose for spinal fusion and sacroiliac screw insertion?.

Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 468: 2419-2429Buza J.A. Good C.R. Lehman R.A. et al.

Robotic-assisted cortical bone trajectory (CBT) screws using the Mazor X Stealth Edition (MXSE) system: workflow and technical tips for safe and efficient use.

J Robotic Surg. 15: 13-23Fan Y. Du J. Zhang J. et al.

Comparison of accuracy of pedicle screw insertion among 4 guided technologies in spine surgery.

Med Sci Monitor. 23: 5960-5968Bhatt F.R. Orosz L.D. Tewari A. et al.

Augmented reality-assisted spine surgery: an early experience demonstrating safety and accuracy with 218 screws.

Glob Spine J. 0: 1-6Garg S. Kleck C.J. Gum J.L. et al.

Navigation options for spinal surgeons: state of the art 2021.

Instr Course Lect. 71: 399-411

Machine vision navigation in spine surgery.

Front Surg. 8https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2021.640554Gebhard F. Kraus M. Schneider E. et al.

Radiation dosage in orthopedics -- a comparison of computer-assisted procedures.

Unfallchirurg. 106: 492-497Gebhard F. Weidner A. Liener U.C. et al.

Navigation at the spine.

Injury. 35: 35-45Gebhard F.T. Kraus M.D. Schneider E. et al.

Does Computer-Assisted Spine Surgery Reduce Intraoperative Radiation Doses?.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 31: 2024-2027Smith H. Welsch M. Ugurlu H. et al.

Comparison of radiation exposure in lumbar pedicle screw placement with fluoroscopy vs computer-assisted image guidance with intraoperative three-dimensional imaging.

J Spinal Cord Med. 31: 532-537Nelson E.M. Monazzam S.M. Kim K.D. et al.

Intraoperative fluoroscopy, portable X-ray, and CT: patient and operating room personnel radiation exposure in spinal surgery.

Spine J. 14: 2985-2991Theocharopoulos N. Perisinakis K. Damilakis J. et al.

Occupational Exposure from Common Fluoroscopic Projections Used in Orthopaedic Surgery.

J Bone Joint Surg. 85: 1698-1703Jones D.P.G. Robertson P.A. Lunt B. et al.

Radiation exposure during fluoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion in the lumbar spine.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25: 1538-1541Nakashima H. Sato K. Ando T. et al.

Comparison of the percutaneous screw placement precision of isocentric C-arm 3-dimensional fluoroscopy-navigated pedicle screw implantation and conventional fluoroscopy method with minimally invasive surgery.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 22: 468-472Merloz P. Troccaz J. Vouaillat H. et al.

Fluoroscopy-based navigation system in spine surgery.

Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 221: 813-820Lee G.Y.F. Massicotte E.M. Raja Rampersaud Y.

Clinical accuracy of cervicothoracic pedicle screw placement.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 20: 25-32Laine T. Lund T. Ylikoski M. et al.

Accuracy of pedicle screw insertion with and without computer assistance: a randomised controlled clinical study in 100 consecutive patients.

Eur Spine J. 9: 235-240Kotani Y. Abumi K. Ito M. et al.

Accuracy Analysis of Pedicle Screw Placement in Posterior Scoliosis Surgery.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 32: 1543-1550Kotani Y. Abumi K. Ito M. et al.

Improved accuracy of computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw insertion.

J Neurosurg. 99: 257-263Ito H. Neo M. Yoshida M. et al.

Efficacy of computer-assisted pedicle screw insertion for cervical instability in RA patients.

Rheumatol Int. 27: 567-574Ishikawa Y. Kanemura T. Yoshida G. et al.

Clinical accuracy of three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement: a retrospective comparative study of conventional versus computer-assisted cervical pedicle screw placement.

J Neurosurg. 13: 606-611

[Spinal navigation with intra-operative 3D-imaging modality in lumbar pedicle screw fixation].

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 88: 1905-1908Yson S.C. Sembrano J.N. Sanders P.C. et al.

Comparison of cranial facet joint violation rates between open and percutaneous pedicle screw placement using intraoperative 3-D CT (O-arm) computer navigation.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 38: E251-E258Verma S.K. Singh P.K. Agrawal D. et al.

O-arm with navigation versus C-arm: a review of screw placement over 3 years at a major trauma center.

Br J Neurosurg. 30: 658-661van de Kelft E. Costa F. van der Planken D. et al.

A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the o-arm imaging system and stealthstation navigation.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 37: E1580-E1587Shin M.H. Ryu K.S. Park C.K.

Accuracy and safety in pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spines : comparison study between conventional c-arm fluoroscopy and navigation coupled with o-arm® guided methods.

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 52: 204Luther N. Iorgulescu J.B. Geannette C. et al.

Comparison of navigated versus non-navigated pedicle screw placement in 260 patients and 1434 screws.

J Spinal Disord Tech. 28: E298-E303Larson A.N. Santos E.R.G. Polly D.W. et al.

Pediatric pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography and 3-dimensional image-guided navigation.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 37: E188-E194Amiot L.P. Lang K. Putzier M. et al.

Comparative results between conventional and computer-assisted pedicle screw installation in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral spine.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25: 606-614Towner J.E. Li Y.I. Singla A. et al.

Retrospective review of revision surgery after image-guided instrumented spinal surgery compared with traditional instrumented spinal surgery.

Clin Spine Surg. 33: E317-E321Baky F.J. Milbrandt T. Echternacht S. et al.

Intraoperative Computed Tomography–Guided Navigation for Pediatric Spine Patients Reduced Return to Operating Room for Screw Malposition Compared With Freehand/Fluoroscopic Techniques.

Spine Deformity. 7: 577-581Sclafani J.A. Regev G.J. Webb J. et al.

Use of a quantitative pedicle screw accuracy system to assess new technology: Initial studies on O-arm navigation and its effect on the learning curve of percutaneous pedicle screw insertion.

SAS J. 5: 57-62Malham G.M. Wells-Quinn T.

What should my hospital buy next?—Guidelines for the acquisition and application of imaging, navigation, and robotics for spine surgery.

J Spine Surg. 5: 155-165Overley S.C. Cho S.K. Mehta A.I. et al.

Navigation and robotics in spinal surgery: where are we now?.

Neurosurgery. 80: S86-S99Zausinger S. Scheder B. Uhl E. et al.

Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in spinal stabilizations.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 34: 2919-2926Drazin D. Al-Khouja L. Shweikeh F. et al.

Economics of image guidance and navigation in spine surgery.

Surg Neurol Int. 6: S323-S326Huang M. Tetreault T.A. Vaishnav A. et al.

The current state of navigation in robotic spine surgery.

Ann Transl Med. 9https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-2020-ioi-07D’Souza M. Gendreau J. Feng A. et al.

Robotic-assisted spine surgery: history, efficacy, cost, and future trends.

Robotic Surg Res Rev. 6: 9-23Nathoo N. Çavuşoğlu M.C. Vogelbaum M.A. et al.

In touch with robotics: neurosurgery for the future.

Neurosurgery. 56: 421-433Lee N.J. Zuckerman S.L. Buchanan I.A. et al.

Is there a difference between navigated and non-navigated robot cohorts in robot-assisted spine surgery? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 2,800 screws and 372 patients.

Spine J. 21: 1504-1512Fatima N. Massaad E. Hadzipasic M. et al.

Safety and accuracy of robot-assisted placement of pedicle screws compared to conventional free-hand technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Spine J. 21: 181-192Peng Y.N. Tsai L.C. Hsu H.C. et al.

Accuracy of robot-assisted versus conventional freehand pedicle screw placement in spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Ann Translational Med. 8: 824Lee N.J. Buchanan I.A. Zuckermann S.L. et al.

What is the comparison in robot time per screw, radiation exposure, robot abandonment, screw accuracy, and clinical outcomes between percutaneous and open robot-assisted short lumbar fusion? a multicenter, propensity-matched analysis of 310 patients.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 47: 42-48Roser F. Tatagiba M. Maier G.

Spinal Robotics.

Neurosurgery. 72: A12-A18Good C.R. Orosz L.D. Thomson A.E. et al.

Robotic-guidance allows for accurate S2AI screw placement without complications.

J Robotic Surg. 0123456789: 2-7Lee N.J. Leung E. Buchanan I.A. et al.

A multicenter study of the 5-year trends in robot-assisted spine surgery outcomes and complications.

J Spine Surg. 8: 9-20Lee N.J. Buchanan I.A. Boddapati V. et al.

Do robot-related complications influence 1 year reoperations and other clinical outcomes after robot-assisted lumbar arthrodesis? A multicenter assessment of 320 patients.

J Orthopaedic Surg Res. 16https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02452-zYu C.C. Carreon L.Y. Glassman S.D. et al.

Propensity-matched comparison of 90-day complications in robotic-assisted versus non-robotic assisted lumbar fusion.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 47: 195-200Fiani B. Quadri S.A. Farooqui M. et al.

Impact of robot-assisted spine surgery on health care quality and neurosurgical economics: A systemic review.

Neurosurg Rev. 43: 17-25Gum J.L. Crawford C.H. Djurasovic M. et al.

Introducing navigation or robotics into TLIF techniques: are we optimizing our index episode of care or just spending more money?.

Spine J. 19: S61-S62Menger R.P. Savardekar A.R. Farokhi F. et al.

A cost-effectiveness analysis of the integration of robotic spine technology in spine surgery.

Neurospine. 15: 216-224Urakov T.M. Chang K.H. Burks S.S. et al.

Initial academic experience and learning curve with robotic spine instrumentation.

Neurosurg Focus. 42: E4Kam J.K.T. Gan C. Dimou S. et al.

Learning curve for robot-assisted percutaneous pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery.

Asian Spine J. 13: 920-927Siddiqui M.I. Wallace D.J. Salazar L.M. et al.

Robot-assisted pedicle screw placement: learning curve experience.

World Neurosurg. 130: e417-e422

What is the learning curve for robotic-assisted pedicle screw placement in spine surgery?.

Clin Orthopaedics Relat Res. 472: 1839-1844

Spine surgery assisted by augmented reality: where have we been?.

Yonsei Med J. 63: 305-316Felix B. Kalatar S.B. Moatz B. et al.

Augmented reality spine surgery navigation.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 47: 865-872Carl B. Bopp M. Saß B. et al.

Implementation of augmented reality support in spine surgery.

Eur Spine J. 28: 1697-1711Elmi-Terander A. Nachabe R. Skulason H. et al.

Feasibility and accuracy of thoracolumbar minimally invasive pedicle screw placement with augmented reality navigation technology.

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 43: 1018-1023Elmi-Terander A. Burström G. Nachabé R. et al.

Augmented reality navigation with intraoperative 3D imaging vs fluoroscopy-assisted free-hand surgery for spine fixation surgery: a matched-control study comparing accuracy.

Scientific Rep. 10: 1-8Liu A. Jin Y. Cottrill E. et al.

Clinical accuracy and initial experience with augmented reality-assisted pedicle screw placement: the first 205 screws.

J Neurosurg Spine. 36: 351-357

Editorial. Navigation in spine surgery: an innovation here to stay.

J Neurosurg Spine. 36: 347-349