Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.
Buy
FullText & PDF
Unlimited re-access via MyKarger
Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *
Select
KAB
Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!
If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.
Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.
Learn more
Access via DeepDyve
Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article
Organize, annotate And mark up articles
Printing And downloading restrictions apply
Select
Subscribe
Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years
Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger
Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more
Subcription rates
Select
* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.
Article / Publication Details
Abstract
Objective Gestational Trophoblastic Diseases (GTD) comprise a group of rare diseases originating from the trophoblast, affecting women of child-bearing age. Providing optimal information to patients with a rare disease is challenging, because of the small number of patients and limited clinical expertise of many healthcare professionals. Both knowledge and lack of knowledge in patients may influence illness perception. We investigated whether a web-based interactive intervention influences illness perception and knowledge in women with GTD.
Design Multicenter randomized control trial.
Setting General and academic hospitals in the Netherlands.
Population Newly diagnosed GTD patients between 2017-2019.
Methods Sixty-nine patients were randomized between direct access or postponed access to an online tool on GTD and received online questionnaires about illness perception, knowledge and anxiety. The main outcome measures were illness perception (primary outcome measure) and knowledge (secondary outcome measure)
Results Patients using the online tool were satisfied with the information from the tool (92%). Although they had a higher level of knowledge compared to the control group (p = 0.006), illness perception did not change. Also, no differences in levels of anxiety, depression and distress were observed between the groups.
Limitations: Participants had access to other information sources and many searched other websites. It is unknown what kind of websites were visited and when. It is unknown if the increased knowledge levels and low levels of distress will sustain over time as no long term follow-up took place. Healthcare professionals were not interviewed on how they experienced the consultation before and after using the tool by the patients.
Conclusions The online tool did not change illness perception, but was shown to be valuable for newly-diagnosed GTD patients to gain knowledge. The improvement in knowledge after digital education, indicates that this tool can be used as an effective method of supporting GTD patients’ informational needs without causing extra distress.
S. Karger AG, Basel
Article / Publication Details
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
Comments (0)