Optical coherence tomography angiography in diabetic macular edema treated with intravitreal aflibercept: a 48-week observational study (the DOCTA study)

Log in to MyKarger to check if you already have access to this content.

Buy FullText & PDF Unlimited re-access via MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use
read more

CHF 38.00 *
EUR 35.00 *
USD 39.00 *

Select

KAB

Buy a Karger Article Bundle (KAB) and profit from a discount!

If you would like to redeem your KAB credit, please log in.

Save over 20% compared to the individual article price.

Learn more

Access via DeepDyve Unlimited fulltext viewing of this article Organize, annotate And mark up articles Printing And downloading restrictions apply

Select

Subscribe Access to all articles of the subscribed year(s) guaranteed for 5 years Unlimited re-access via Subscriber Login or MyKarger Unrestricted printing, no saving restrictions for personal use read more

Subcription rates

Select

* The final prices may differ from the prices shown due to specifics of VAT rules.

Article / Publication Details Abstract

Introduction: Central vision loss due to diabetic macular edema (DME) is related to the macular edema itself, but also in some cases to alterations of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ). The aim of this trial was to study changes in macular vessels in eyes with DME treated with aflibercept using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: This was a longitudinal, prospective, non-controlled, single arm study. The primary objective was the quantitative assessment of macular vessels over time in patients with DME treated with intravitreal aflibercept during a 48-week follow-up using OCTA. Results: Twenty-six DME eyes from 26 patients were included (mean age, 64.6 years; women, 53.8%; prior anti-VEGF treatment, 46.1%). Each eye received a mean (SD) of 7.2 (2.2) injections. The parameters of the FAZ did not change during the 48-week follow-up: the mean (SD) FAZ area varied from 0.19 (0.19) mm2 at baseline (n=22) to 0.23 (0.20) mm2 at week 48 (n=15), boundary from 1.54 (1.21) to 2.04 (1.20) mm and circularity from 0.45 (0.33) % to 0.57 (0.20) %. There was no change in perfusion density and vessel density of the macula in the 3-mm circle. As expected, mean central retinal thickness, macular volume and visual acuity improved during follow-up. Discussion/Conclusion: No change in macular perfusion was observed in eyes with DME during a 48-week follow-up after intravitreal injections of aflibercept. Randomized controlled trials using OCT-angiography in large populations with extended observation periods are needed to assess changes in macular vessels after intravitreal anti-VEGF treatment.

S. Karger AG, Basel

Article / Publication Details Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

Comments (0)

No login
gif