THE RISE OF PATIENT-SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS: FROM 3D RECONSTRUCTIONS TO DIGITAL TWINS
Section:
ChooseTop of pageTHE RISE OF PATIENT-SPECI... <<PATIENT-SPECIFIC DIGITAL ...THE ISSUE OF ACCURACY AND...FROM DIGITAL TWINS TO IN ...FUTURE PERSPECTIVE: CHALL...The clinical and bioengineering arenas are experiencing tremendous technological progress. Imaging technologies yield images with continuously improved time- and space-resolution; image processing is being boosted by the introduction of artificial intelligence (AI) techniques allowing for time-efficient, automated, and reliable segmentation of tissues or organs; and the performance of computational infrastructures is increasing exponentially. In this scenario, it is becoming easier and faster to exploit the anatomical and functional information generated by medical imaging to feed computer models meant to gain insights into clinically relevant scenarios.
In their most basic version (Fig. 1), such models are detailed reconstructions that allow for the 3D quantification of the anatomy and of its motion, as well as for the quantification of clinically relevant functional metrics, e.g., 3D strain distributions as computed from ultrasound imaging (Rego et al., 201829. Rego, B. V., Khalighi, A. H., Drach, A., Lai, E. K., Pouch, A. M., Gorman, R. C., Gorman, J. H. III, and Sacks, M. S., “ A noninvasive method for the determination of in vivo mitral valve leaflet strains,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 34(12), e3142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3142) and fluid dynamic footprints of blood velocity fields as derived from 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (Piatti et al., 201723. Piatti, F., Sturla, F., Bissell, M. M., Pirola, S., Lombardi, M., Nesteruk, I., Della Corte, A., Redaelli, A., and Votta, E., “ 4D flow analysis of BAV-related fluid-dynamic alterations: Evidences of wall shear stress alterations in absence of clinically-relevant aortic anatomical remodeling,” Front. Physiol. 8, 441 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00441). In clinics, these models provide physicians with exhaustive and non-misleading information to plan interventions: relevant examples are the choice of the best access and path to reach a target without harming noble structures, as in neurosurgery (Ferroli et al., 20138. Ferroli, P., Tringali, G., Acerbi, F., Schiariti, M., Broggi, M., Aquino, D., and Broggi, G., “ Advanced 3-dimensional planning in neurosurgery,” Neurosurgery 72(Suppl.), A54–A62 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1227/NEU.0b013e3182748ee8). The advent of augmented reality and virtual reality is empowering this type of model by providing the end-user with fully 3D and immersive renderings that allow for the better understanding of particularly complex anatomies, as in the case of patients whose anatomy is deranged by major congenital diseases (Butera et al., 20195. Butera, G., Sturla, F., Pluchinotta, F. R., Caimi, A., and Carminati, M., “ Holographic augmented reality and 3D printing for advanced planning of sinus venosus ASD/partial anomalous pulmonary venous return percutaneous management,” JACC: Cardiovasc. Interventions 12(14), 1389–1391 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.03.020).In their most sophisticated version (Fig. 1), patient-specific models simulate the physics of the analyzed organ or tissue (see, e.g., Krishnan et al., 201513. Krishnan, K., Ge, L., Haraldsson, H., Hope, M. D., Saloner, D. A., Guccione, J. M., and Tseng, E. E., “ Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm wall stress analysis using patient-specific finite element modeling of in vivo magnetic resonance imaging,” Interact. Cardiovasc. Thorac. Surg. 21(4), 471–480 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivv186; Collia et al., 20196. Collia, D., Zovatto, L., and Pedrizzetti, G., “ Analysis of mitral valve regurgitation by computational fluid dynamics,” APL Bioeng. 3, 036105 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5097245). To this aim, the information on anatomy and motion of organs is complemented by the quantitative description of tissue micro-architecture (Lee et al., 201415. Lee, C. H., Amini, R., Gorman, R. C., Gorman, J. H., 3rd, and Sacks, M. S., “ An inverse modeling approach for stress estimation in mitral valve anterior leaflet valvuloplasty for in-vivo valvular biomaterial assessment,” J. Biomech. 47(9), 2055–2063 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.10.058)—e.g., myocardial fiber organization derived from diffusion tensor imaging (Whittaker et al., 201935. Whittaker, D. G., Benson, A. P., Teh, I., Schneider, J. E., and Colman, M. A., “ Investigation of the role of myocyte orientations in cardiac arrhythmia using image-based models,” Biophys. J. 117(12), 2396–2408 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.09.041)—and physical properties—e.g., mechanical properties, porosity, and electrical conductivity (Avazmohammadi et al., 20172. Avazmohammadi, R., Hill, M., Simon, M., and Sacks, M. S., “ Transmural remodeling of right ventricular myocardium in response to pulmonary arterial hypertension,” APL Bioeng. 1, 016105 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011639). These models are expected to be high-fidelity replicas, or digital twins, of the tissues of organs affected by the disease. As such, they are used to simulate potential treatments and quantify the associated response of the relevant tissue or organ in terms of, e.g., tissue stresses (Rausch et al., 201728. Rausch, M. K., Zöllner, A. M., Genet, M., Baillargeon, B., Bothe, W., and Kuhl, E., “ A virtual sizing tool for mitral valve annuloplasty,” Int. J. Numer. Method. Biomed. Eng. 33(2), e02788 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.2788) or tissue remodeling (He et al., 20199. He, Y., Zuo, D., Hackl, K., Yang, H., Mousavi, S. J., and Avril, S., “ Gradient-enhanced continuum models of healing in damaged soft tissues,” Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 18(5), 1443–1460 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01155-z; Boland et al., 20194. Boland, E. L., Grogan, J. A., and McHugh, P. E., “ Computational modelling of magnesium stent mechanical performance in a remodelling artery: Effects of multiple remodelling stimuli,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 35(10), e3247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cnm.3247). The computed variables are considered relevant, and sometimes pivotal, to predict potential acute intra- or peri-operative adverse events and longer-term effects of surgery. The potential of these models as tools to support decision making is in the possibility to define a set of parameters characterizing the envisioned treatment (e.g., type of technique; type, size, and location of the devices to be implanted and changes in patient conditions driven by drug therapy) and to systematically quantify the effects of the corresponding changes.Owing to their potential, these patient-specific image-based computational models are becoming ubiquitous in (i) industrial R&D, where they are used to virtually test the effects of prototypal devices and, consistently with the 3R principles, they are coupled with in vitro testing to reduce the need for animal models; (ii) regulatory processes, where not only the results of computational modeling of medical devices are considered crucial to their approval by agencies but also computational modeling can embody the actual medical device (Software as Medical Device—SAMD); and (iii) clinical practice, where computational models are used as SAMDs for the analysis of pathological conditions, prognosis, and decision making.
PATIENT-SPECIFIC DIGITAL TWINS IN THE CLINICAL ARENA
Section:
ChooseTop of pageTHE RISE OF PATIENT-SPECI...PATIENT-SPECIFIC DIGITAL ... <<THE ISSUE OF ACCURACY AND...FROM DIGITAL TWINS TO IN ...FUTURE PERSPECTIVE: CHALL...To be adopted in the clinical routine, patient-specific digital twins must provide evidence of additional values as compared to standard approaches.
On the one hand, they can provide objective forecast capabilities and quantitative information, allowing for choosing among different surgical approaches, devices, or sizes. Possibly, they should be capable of reducing the need for invasive planning procedures by identifying those cases where the surgical approach is actually beneficial. This is the case, for instance, of software to support the planning of transcatheter valve implantation by assessing the device post-implant deformation, as well as the risk for device migration, paravalvular leakage and, in the case of the aortic valve, conduction abnormalities (Rocatello et al., 201931. Rocatello, G., Faquir, N. E., de Backer, O., Swaans, M. J., Latib, A., Vicentini, L., Segers, P., De Beule, M., de Jaegere, P., and Mortier, P., “ The impact of size and position of a mechanical expandable transcatheter aortic valve: Novel insights through computational modelling and simulation,” J. Cardiovasc. Transl. Res. 12(5), 435–446 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12265-019-09877-2).On the other hand, they can provide information in a cheaper or most effective way or a combination of the two. This is the case, for instance, of computational fluid-dynamics models for the estimation of the coronary Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) in stenosed coronary vessels. This approach has proved a valid alternative to coronary angiography, showing a comparable sensitivity, i.e., capability to correctly identify patients with coronary obstruction, and specificity, i.e., capability to correctly identify those without coronary obstruction but at a significantly lower cost and without the risks associated with catheterism (Min et al., 201519. Min, J. K., Taylor, C. A., Achenbach, S., Koo, B. K., Leipsic, J., Nørgaard, B. L., Pijls, N. L., and De Bruyne, B., “ Noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary CT angiography: Clinical data and scientific principles,” JACC: Cardiovasc. Imaging 8(10), 1209–1222 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.08.006).At the same time, to be effectively exploited in real clinical settings, a patient-specific digital twin must be (i) easy to use, i.e., it must not require end-users to master simulations; this may require the creation of an automated black-box system, where pre-operative medical imaging is uploaded and the computational results are then presented, through a completely automated processing system or by using an outsourcing service completing the model setup upon clinical data input; (ii) fast, i.e., the time-expense to obtain results must be compatible with clinical agendas; this can be obtained through state-of-the-art and robust supercomputing platforms available on the supervised computing system in the cloud; and (iii) reliable, i.e., the simplifications in the model must not lead the end-user to misjudge the simulated scenario. At this purpose, since computational results can be driven by many model parameters, these should be systematically changed within reasonable ranges to exhaustively explore the parameter space and assess the corresponding changes in model outputs, thus yielding results to the end user with confidence intervals.
THE ISSUE OF ACCURACY AND UNCERTAINTIES
Section:
ChooseTop of pageTHE RISE OF PATIENT-SPECI...PATIENT-SPECIFIC DIGITAL ...THE ISSUE OF ACCURACY AND... <<FROM DIGITAL TWINS TO IN ...FUTURE PERSPECTIVE: CHALL...Patient specific modeling is still far from being standardized. The most delicate issue related to patient specific models is their verifiability and validation. Verification consists in evaluating whether the model meets the requirements and specifications; it typically consists of the careful check of the hypotheses underlying the model and of the equations and parameters chosen for the description of the phenomenon. Validation consists of the assessment of the capacity of the model to fulfill its intended purpose and to replicate the behavior of the real system.
The problem of accuracy is related mainly to the validation process and to the model robustness to “perturbations,” i.e., the possibility that model inputs are, to some extent, uncertain.
Each aspect of the modeling process is a potential source of uncertainty. Even the initial, and apparently most basic, step, i.e., the 3D reconstruction of the relevant anatomies, is no exception. Despite the use of cutting-edge imaging technology, some anatomical structures may be not clearly visible or not visible at all because of insufficient space-resolution or contrast of the images. For example, with reference to cardiac biomechanics, valve leaflets are too thin for their thickness distribution to be captured from CMR or CT images; zoomed-in 3D ultrasound images can be used to this aim, but measurements are very operator-dependent. The chordal apparatus of atrioventricular valves cannot be reconstructed from in vivo clinical imaging. In small vessels, the space-resolution of clinical images is comparable to the lumen of the vessel and greater than the wall thickness.
The patient-specific mechanical properties of solid tissues are typically unknown. Their displacement can be estimated from imaging, as for the compliance of blood vessels. However, mechanical properties also depend on further parameters that may not be measurable, as, for vessel, wall thickness. The modeling of mechanical properties becomes particularly prone to uncertainty when dealing with soft tissues, whose stress–strain response is non-linear and in some cases anisotropic and viscoelastic. In the absence of patient-specific data, this complex response may be modeled based on data obtained from ex vivo mechanical testing. However, these are often obtained from animal models and, even when obtained from human tissue, are rarely specific to, e.g., the age, gender, ethnicity, and pathophysiological condition of the patient. The reliable modeling of tissue mechanical properties becomes even more complicated when dealing with contractile tissue, as for myocardium. Muscle contraction is dictated by the arrangement of myofibers, which can be appreciated with diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Avazmohammadi et al., 20191. Avazmohammadi, R., Soares, J. S., Li, D. S., Raut, S. S., Gorman, R. C., and Sacks, M. S., “ A contemporary look at biomechanical models of myocardium,” Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 21, 417–442 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-062117-121129), but only in ex vivo studies or on animals, by the inotropic state of the heart as a whole, and by regional contractility, which can be dramatically heterogeneous especially in the case of post-ischemic and dilated pathological hearts. Similarly, the rheological properties of fluids (density and viscosity) in fluid dynamics simulations are, in almost every work in the literature, assumed regardless of the real situation of the patient. Although in this case it is possible to take a blood sample and carry out characterization tests and derive viscosity from the hematocrit measurement, this is never done. It has been estimated that the error made using data distributed within the physiological range can be of the order of 10% (Morbiducci et al., 201121. Morbiducci, U., Gallo, D., Massai, D., Ponzini, R., Deriu, M. A., Antiga, A., Redaelli, A., and Montevecchi, F. M., “ On the importance of blood rheology for bulk flow in hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation,” J. Biomech. 44(13), 2427–2438 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2011.06.028). Concerning blood, the comprehension of the mechanisms underlying its susceptibility to abnormal flow conditions is also crucial since abnormal flows determined by pathologic vessel morphologies or implanted devices can trigger thromboembolic events, which are ultimately responsible for a wide class of cardiovascular diseases (Kim et al., 201911. Kim, D., Bresette, C., Liu, Z., and Ku, D. N., “ Occlusive thrombosis in arteries,” APL Bioeng. 3, 041502 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5115554; Slepian et al., 201733. Slepian, M. J., Sheriff, J., Hutchinson, M., Tran, P., Bajaj, N., Garcia, J. G. N., Scott Saavedra, S., and Bluestein, D., “ Shear-mediated platelet activation in the free flow: Perspectives on the emerging spectrum of cell mechanobiological mechanisms mediating cardiovascular implant thrombosis,” J. Biomech. 50, 20–25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.11.016). Finally, there is a problem related to the simulation of the adaptive response of tissues and organs to surgical or pharmacological treatments: on the short and medium-terms, these may induce tissue growth and changes in solid tissue mechanical properties or in fluid tissue rheology. Such responses may be modeled mathematically, but predicting their time-evolution, even for the average patient, requires feeding the adaptation models with data gathered from longitudinal studies on wide cohorts of patients.The boundary conditions and the associated uncertainty are also crucial. It is the case of patient-specific fluid dynamics simulations, where the 3D inflow velocity profile can significantly impact the domain flow field. However, clinical imaging has strong limitations in this perspective. Echo-Doppler can measure peak velocities, but it is strongly operator dependent and cannot provide information about the 3D velocity profile. Phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging (PC-MRI) in through-plane mode allows for the indirect measurement of blood through-plane velocity component distribution, and in 3D mode, the in-plane components can also be assessed (Pirola et al., 201824. Pirola, S., Jarral, O. A., O'Regan, D. P., Asimakopoulos, G., Anderson, J. R., Pepper, J. R., Athanasiou, T., and Xu, X. Y., “ Computational study of aortic hemodynamics for patients with an abnormal aortic valve: The importance of secondary flow at the ascending aorta inlet,” APL Bioeng. 2, 026101 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5011960). However, the use of to impose boundary conditions to patient specific models is not yet widespread, and PC-MRI data are hampered by relatively poor space- and time-resolution as compared to computational settings and by noise. As a result, PC-MRI does not yield accurate data on the small vessels; this limitation can affect also the simulation of blood fluid dynamics in medium- and large-size vessels with bifurcations (as in carotid arteries) or lateral branches (as for the supra-aortic vessels stemming from the aortic arch). Correctly imposing the flow rate repartition among outflow vessels is also pivotal, and even small errors can determine unrealistic velocity flow fields, e.g., with artificially created vorticosity and pressure gradients immediately upstream from the outlet sections (Morbiducci et al., 201020. Morbiducci, U., Gallo, D., Massai, D., Consolo, F., Ponzini, R., Antiga, L., Bignardi, C., Deriu, M. A., and Redaelli, A., “ Outflow conditions for image-based hemodynamic models of the carotid bifurcation: Implications for indicators of abnormal flow,” J. Biomech. Eng. 132(9), 091005 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001886; Pirola et al., 201725. Pirola, S., Cheng, Z., Jarral, O. A., O'Regan, D. P., Pepper, J. R., Athanasiou, T., and Xu, X. Y., “ On the choice of outlet boundary conditions for patient-specific analysis of aortic flow using computational fluid dynamics,” J. Biomech. 60, 15–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.06.005). The setting of percentage distribution between the various outflow vessels, an option typically present in simulation codes, generates macroscopic errors. The use of one-dimensional lumped or 1D models connected to the 3D domain is a valid alternative that preserves the physics of the system but is sometimes complex to implement.FUTURE PERSPECTIVE: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Section:
ChooseTop of pageTHE RISE OF PATIENT-SPECI...PATIENT-SPECIFIC DIGITAL ...THE ISSUE OF ACCURACY AND...FROM DIGITAL TWINS TO IN ...FUTURE PERSPECTIVE: CHALL... <<In conclusion, after 20+ years from their conception, patient specific models can now really drive the pace in the biomedical arena, providing evidence of efficacy of novel medical devices, making available huge in silico patient populations for medical trials, allowing for real time simulation of different therapeutic scenarios thanks to a strict symbiosis of sophisticated in vivo data and advanced in silico technologies.
Comments (0)