Awareness and practice pertaining to the use of digital imaging for orthodontic purposes among undergraduate dental students


 Table of Contents   ORIGINAL ARTICLE Year : 2022  |  Volume : 13  |  Issue : 6  |  Page : 568-572  

Awareness and practice pertaining to the use of digital imaging for orthodontic purposes among undergraduate dental students

V Rieshy1, Nivethigaa Balakrishnan2, T R Prasanna Arvind2
1 Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Date of Submission19-Apr-2022Date of Acceptance22-Jul-2022Date of Web Publication30-Dec-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Nivethigaa Balakrishnan
Department of Orthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospitals, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Saveetha University, Chennai, Tamil Nadu
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Crossref citationsCheck

DOI: 10.4103/japtr.japtr_156_22

Rights and Permissions


The current study aimed at evaluation of the awareness of undergraduate dental students regarding the use of digital imaging that are used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment. An online survey using google forms was conducted among the undergraduate dental students as a part of this study setting. The sample size of participants was 109. The survey was composed of a set of 14 questions including demographics. Ethical clearance was obtained from the Institutionalized ethical committee. SPSS software was used for data analysis and descriptive statistics. Among the entire population, 46.2% participants said that they would be using digital dental imaging during their practices and in their career and the remaining 53.8% participants said that they would not be using digital imaging due to various reasons. This study found out that undergraduate dental students have an average level of awareness regarding the use of digital dental imaging that are used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords: Digital imaging, innovative technology, knowledge, orthodontic purposes, radiation


How to cite this article:
Rieshy V, Balakrishnan N, Arvind T R. Awareness and practice pertaining to the use of digital imaging for orthodontic purposes among undergraduate dental students. J Adv Pharm Technol Res 2022;13, Suppl S2:568-72
How to cite this URL:
Rieshy V, Balakrishnan N, Arvind T R. Awareness and practice pertaining to the use of digital imaging for orthodontic purposes among undergraduate dental students. J Adv Pharm Technol Res [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 30];13, Suppl S2:568-72. Available from: https://www.japtr.org/text.asp?2022/13/6/568/366344   Introduction Top

Since the invention of X-rays, the field of imaging has progressed from 2D images to more comprehensive imaging, known as 3D imaging, that can significantly improve various treatment options.[1] These advanced imaging techniques have improved the diagnosis of many diseases as well as the quality of their treatment.[2] To avoid exposing the patient to the deleterious effects of ionizing radiation, it is very much crucial to choose an appropriate screening or testing approach at the diagnosis stage.[3] New studies are focused on improving image acquisition with importance on minimal adverse radiation effects.[4] In any new strategy, the benefit of the transformation to any fundamental shift in representation should not only be taken into account but also in terms of expense and risk.[5]

Computed tomography (CT), including its 3D and ortho CT variants, has recently been used to diagnose a number of dental problems.[6] Dental radiology is a clinical specialty that is rapidly developing. Dental X-ray radiation exposure is typically not noticeably more dangerous than other commonplace dangers, such as intraoral X-rays.[7] The extent of the effect following a diagnostic level of radiation is unclear.[8] The field of CT was introduced in the late 1900s, but because of its high costs, radiation sensitivity, and limited usage, its application was limited to situations such as complicated anomalies.[9],[10] Because of the relative availability of reduced cost and decreased exposure of cone-beam CT (CBCT), interest in the use of 3D imaging has developed drastically over the last two decades, especially in orthodontic treatment strategies.[11] A new forum for diagnosis and care preparation has been launched with the implementation of CBCT for the dentomaxillofacial zone.[12]

In the last decade, the dentist has created 3D-diagnostics possibilities for the most innovative breakthrough in dentistry.[13] It offers multi-dimensional images in real time, which have extended the function of imaging from diagnosis to image operations for postoperative evaluations.[1] In recent days, dentists have been prominent with CBCT in our country and have favored imaging.

Our research and knowledge have resulted in high-quality publications from our team.[14],[15],[16],[17],[18],[19],[20],[21],[22],[23],[24],[25],[26],[27],[28] Thus, the current study aimed to evaluating the awareness of undergraduate dental students regarding the use of digital dental imaging that is used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment.

  Materials and Methods Top

This cross-sectional study was conducted among dental students in a private institution in August 2021. An online questionnaire was distributed through Google Forms among the undergraduate dental students till the final year. The sample size of participants was estimated to be 109 from the study done by Balabaskaran et al.[29] Ethical approval and informed consent from the participants were obtained. Stratified random sampling was used among first to final-year students. The measure taken to minimize the sampling bias was stratification and matching independent variables in a selected sample. The internal validity was the usage of a pretested questionnaire.

The questionnaire presented consisted of a set of 14 questions including demographic information. Data collection software was used. Data manipulation/cleanup in Excel spreadsheet. The list of output variables assessed was the knowledge, awareness, and practice among undergraduate dental students regarding the use of digital dental imaging that is used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment. Each output variable was represented and framed in a table form. The statistical software used was SPSS 23.0, which was a statistical software developed by International Business Machines Corporation (IBM), Armonk, New York, United States of America. Descriptive and association tests were done to analyze the interrelationship between the variables. The institutional clearance certificate number is IHEC/SDC/ORTHO/21/051.

  Results Top

The results that were obtained from the survey have been arranged in tabular form as shown in [Table 1] and were plotted graphically for a clear assessment as shown in [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4].

Table 1: Table represents the questionnaire asked and the survey answers that were replied by the participants

Click here to view

Figure 1: Bar chart representing the gender-based association between CBCT and CT in comparison of radiation. The X-axis depicts the gender distribution and Y-axis depicts the percentage of students. Out of 100% of the population who preferred CBCT emits low radiation than CT, 62.5 were females and 37.5 constituted males. Hence, more females preferred to use CBCT than CT as it emits very low radiation when compared to CT. CT: Computed tomography, CBCT: Cone-beam computed tomography

Click here to view

Figure 2: Bar chart representing the association of gender and the best technology that was preferred to view the periodontal status. X-axis depicts participant gender and Y-axis depicts the Percentage of students. Out of 100% of the population who preferred CBCT as the best technology to view the periodontal status, 50 constituted females and 50 constituted males. Hence, both females and males preferred CBCT as the best technology to view the periodontal status. CBCT: Cone-beam computed tomography

Click here to view

Figure 3: Bar chart represents the association of gender and the best technology that was preferred to view the root resorption. X-axis depicts participant gender and Y-axis depicts the Percentage of students. Out of 15.4% of the population who preferred CBCT as the best technology to view the root resorption, 7.7 constituted females and 7.7 constituted males. Hence, both males and females preferred CBCT as the best technology to view the root resorption. CBCT: Cone-beam computed tomography

Click here to view

Figure 4: Bar chart representing the association of gender and accuracy of 2D image obtained from CBCT. The X-axis depicts the gender of the participant and Y-axis depicts the Percentage of students. Out of 100 of the population who said 2D image obtained from CBCT is accurate, 62.5 constituted females and 37.5 constituted males. Hence, more females prefer CBCT for obtaining an accurate 2D image. CBCT: Cone-beam computed tomography

Click here to view

  Discussion Top

The therapy of oral and maxillofacial pathologies with a lower radiation dosage of CBCT plays an important role in dentistry.[29] The majority of people believe that CBCT differs from CT in that it emits less radiation. The findings were comparable to those of Chau and Fung's experiment,[13],[30] which found that CBCT gave lower doses whereas CT produced larger amounts. The majority of respondents agreed that they would utilize digital imaging in their clinical practices and future careers, while the remaining stated that they would not use digital imaging for a variety of reasons. The findings differed from those of Aditya et al.,[31] who discovered that digital imaging technology such as CBCT was less commonly employed in clinical practice due to a lack of understanding of its applicability in orthodontic procedures. Almost everyone reported that CBCT is better suited for dental purposes when compared to CT. The findings were in relation to previous study which[32] reported that dental practitioners prescribe CBCT imaging only with patient care in mind, enhanced patient safety measures, and improved clinical results. Majority of the population are not aware of the terminology used in CBCT such as field-of-view, second scout view second scout view SSV, and maximum intensity projection. This study is in accordance with the study by Yeh JK, Chen CH[33] on Turkish dental students which highlighted difficulties in acquiring knowledge of different systems without practical experience and may constitute a significant factor contributing to students' indifference to this technology.

  Conclusion Top

Precise information on the use of digital imaging in dentistry is important considering the different applications and varied potential of various technologies such as CBCT and CT in dentistry. Digital imaging is necessary for diagnostic and therapeutic understanding in the field of dentistry. The present study observed, in comparison with other optical imaging systems, that many respondents did not know their radiation exposures. The present study shows that undergraduate dental students have an average level of awareness regarding the use of digital imaging that is used for orthodontic diagnosis and treatment.

Acknowledgment

We thank Saveetha Dental College for providing us the support to conduct the study.

Financial support and sponsorship

The present study was supported by the following agencies:

Saveetha Dental CollegeSIMATS, Saveetha UniversityJeevan Clinic.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

  References Top
1.Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Bosmans H. Modern dental imaging: A review of the current technology and clinical applications in dental practice. Eur Radiol 2010;20:2637-55.  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Venezia P, Ronsivalle V, Rustico L, et al. Accuracy of orthodontic models prototyped for clear aligners therapy: a 3D Imaging analysis comparing different market segments 3D printing protocols. J Dent 2022; Jul 2;124:104212. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2022. 104212.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Leonardi RM. 3D imaging advancements and new technologies in clinical and scientific dental and orthodontic fields. J Clin Med Res 2022;11:2200.  Back to cited text no. 3
    4.Drage N. Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) in general dental practice. Prim Dent J 2018;7:26-30.  Back to cited text no. 4
    5.Roser C, Hilgenfeld T, Sen S, Badrow T, Zingler S, Heiland S, et al. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-An in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig 2021;25:1423-31.  Back to cited text no. 5
    6.Wesemann C, Muallah J, Mah J, Bumann A. Accuracy and efficiency of full-arch digitalization and 3D printing: A comparison between desktop model scanners, an intraoral scanner, a CBCT model scan, and stereolithographic 3D printing. Quintessence Int 2017;48:41-50.  Back to cited text no. 6
    7.de Barros F, da Costa Serra M, Kuhnen B, Orthodontic 2D and 3D frontal sinus imaging records: an important role in human identification. RSD 2021; 10: e49110313608–e49110313608.  Back to cited text no. 7
    8.Dastoori M, Bouserhal JP, Halazonetis DJ, Athanasiou AE. Anterior teeth root inclination prediction derived from digital models: A comparative study of plaster study casts and CBCT images. J Clin Exp Dent 2018;10:e1069-74.  Back to cited text no. 8
    9.Masri R, Driscoll CF. Clinical Applications of Digital Dental Technology. John Wiley & Sons, 2015. DOI:10.1002/9781119045564.  Back to cited text no. 9
    10.Chopra S, Kamboj A. Clinical comparison of pain: Self-ligating versus conventional fixed orthodontic appliance systems. Int J Orthod Rehabil 2021;12:108.  Back to cited text no. 10
    11.Gaêta-Araujo H, Leite AF, Vasconcelos KF, Jacobs R. Two decades of research on CBCT imaging in DMFR-An appraisal of scientific evidence. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2021;50:20200367.  Back to cited text no. 11
    12.Bayat F, Eldib ME, Altunbas C. Megavoltage cross-scatter rejection and correction using 2D antiscatter grids in kilovoltage CBCT imaging. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 2022;12031:120311K.  Back to cited text no. 12
    13.Erten O, Yılmaz BN. Three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics. Turk J Orthod 2018;31:86-94.  Back to cited text no. 13
    14.Wu F, Zhu J, Li G, Wang J, Veeraraghavan VP, Krishna Mohan S, et al. Biologically synthesized green gold nanoparticles from Siberian ginseng induce growth-inhibitory effect on melanoma cells (B16). Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol 2019;47:3297-305.  Back to cited text no. 14
    15.Patil SB, Durairaj D, Suresh Kumar G, Karthikeyan D, Pradeep D. Comparison of extended nasolabial flap versus buccal fat pad graft in the surgical management of oral submucous fibrosis: A prospective pilot study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2017;16:312-21.  Back to cited text no. 15
    16.Uthrakumar R, Vesta C, Raj CJ, Bulk crystal growth and characterization of non-linear optical bisthiourea zinc chloride single crystal by unidirectional growth method. Curr Appl Phys 2010; 10: 548–552.  Back to cited text no. 16
    17.Vijayakumar Jain S, Muthusekhar MR, Baig MF, Senthilnathan P, Loganathan S, Abdul Wahab PU, et al. Evaluation of three-dimensional changes in pharyngeal airway following isolated lefort one osteotomy for the correction of vertical maxillary excess: A prospective study. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2019;18:139-46.  Back to cited text no. 17
    18.Vishnu Prasad S, Kumar M, Ramakrishnan M, Ravikumar D. Report on oral health status and treatment needs of 5-15 years old children with sensory deficits in Chennai, India. Spec Care Dentist 2018;38:58-9.  Back to cited text no. 18
    19.Eapen BV, Baig MF, Avinash S. An assessment of the incidence of prolonged postoperative bleeding after dental extraction among patients on uninterrupted low dose aspirin therapy and to evaluate the need to stop such medication prior to dental extractions. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2017;16:48-52.  Back to cited text no. 19
    20.Krishnamurthy A, Sherlin HJ, Ramalingam K, Natesan A, Premkumar P, Ramani P, et al. Glandular odontogenic cyst: Report of two cases and review of literature. Head Neck Pathol 2009;3:153-8.  Back to cited text no. 20
    21.Dua K, Wadhwa R, Singhvi G, Rapalli V, Shukla SD, Shastri MD, et al. The potential of siRNA based drug delivery in respiratory disorders: Recent advances and progress. Drug Dev Res 2019;80:714-30.  Back to cited text no. 21
    22.Abdul Wahab PU, Senthil Nathan P, Madhulaxmi M, Muthusekhar MR, Loong SC, Abhinav RP. Risk factors for post-operative infection following single piece osteotomy. J Maxillofac Oral Surg 2017;16:328-32.  Back to cited text no. 22
    23.Thanikodi S, Singaravelu D Kumar, Devarajan C, Teaching learning optimization and neural network for the effective prediction of heat transfer rates in tube heat exchangers. Therm Sci 2020; 24: 575–581.  Back to cited text no. 23
    24.Subramaniam N, Muthukrishnan A. Oral mucositis and microbial colonization in oral cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy and chemotherapy: A prospective analysis in a tertiary care dental hospital. J Investig Clin Dent 2019;10:e12454.  Back to cited text no. 24
    25.Kumar SP, Girija ASS, Priyadharsini JV. Targeting NM23-H1-mediated inhibition of tumour metastasis in viral hepatitis with bioactive compounds from Ganoderma lucidum: A computational study. pharmaceutical-sciences; 82. Epub ahead of print 2020. 82(2):300-305. DOI: 10.36468/pharmaceutical-sciences.650.  Back to cited text no. 25
    26.Manickam A, Devarasan E, Manogaran G, Score level based latent fingerprint enhancement and matching using SIFT feature. Multimed Tools Appl 2019; 78: 3065–3085.  Back to cited text no. 26
    27.Ravindiran M, Praveenkumar C. Status review and the future prospects of CZTS based solar cell – A novel approach on the device structure and material modeling for CZTS based photovoltaic device. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;94:317-29.  Back to cited text no. 27
    28.Vadivel JK, Govindarajan M, Somasundaram E, Muthukrishnan A. Mast cell expression in oral lichen planus: A systematic review. J Investig Clin Dent 2019;10:e12457.  Back to cited text no. 28
    29.Balabaskaran K, Saveetha Dental college, India. Awareness and Attitude among Dental Professional towards CBCT. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences 2013; 10: 55–59.  Back to cited text no. 29
    30.Rustia S, Lam J, Tahir P, Al Kharafi L, Oberoi S, Ganguly R. Three-dimensional morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic patients who undergo orthodontic treatment: A systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2022;134:397-406. [doi: 10.1016/j.oooo. 2022.05.003].  Back to cited text no. 30
    31.Rustia S, Lam J, Tahir P, Three-dimensional morphological changes in the temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic patients who undergo orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. Epub ahead of print 13 May 2022. S2212-4403(22)00975-0 .DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.05.003.  Back to cited text no. 31
    32.Balabaskaran K. Awareness and attitude among dental professional towards CBCT. IOSR J Dent Med Sci 2013;10:55-9.  Back to cited text no. 32
    33.Yeh J-K, Chen C-H. Estimated radiation risk of cancer from dental cone-beam computed tomography imaging in orthodontics patients. BMC Oral Health; 18. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-018-0592-5.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
 
 
  [Table 1]

 

Top  

Comments (0)

No login
gif