Telecommunication in the COVID-19 era: As an assessment tool for patients with dermatomyositis



   Table of Contents   LETTER TO EDITOR Year : 2022  |  Volume : 17  |  Issue : 7  |  Page : 431-432

Telecommunication in the COVID-19 era: As an assessment tool for patients with dermatomyositis

Prakash Gupta1, Latika Gupta2
1 MBBS Student, Saint Louis University Hospital of the Sacred Heart Baguio city, Virgen Milagrosa University Foundation-College of Medicine, San Carlos City, Pangasinan, Philippines
2 Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India

Date of Submission13-Oct-2020Date of Acceptance15-Oct-2020Date of Web Publication24-Dec-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Latika Gupta
Department of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Crossref citationsCheck

DOI: 10.4103/injr.injr_286_20

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Gupta P, Gupta L. Telecommunication in the COVID-19 era: As an assessment tool for patients with dermatomyositis. Indian J Rheumatol 2022;17, Suppl S3:431-2

Dear Editor,

A 36-year-old female with anti-Mi-2-positive dermatomyositis reported inability to continue injectable methotrexate during the nationwide lockdown due to the coronavirus disease 2 (COVID-19) pandemic, while requesting a switch to oral drugs. Three months later, she complained of difficulty in climbing stairs, and also reported periungual skin changes and diffuse hair loss. On a teleconsultation, a relapse was confirmed by periungual changes and the V-sign, which was itchy, with areas of excoriation [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b. Pictures of the face suggested malar rash indoors, which could not be identified when clicked in bright sunlight [Figure 1]c and [Figure 1]d. Because an objective assessment using the manual muscle test was not feasible remotely, she was asked to record 2 min of walk distance and the time in seconds to lift the arms overhead ten times twice over a week. The corresponding values were 150 m and 40 s, much lower than the reported average for most patients in remission (180–220 and 8–18 s) in the authors' experience. Elevated muscle enzymes (creatine phosphokinase 580 U/L [25–170], lactate dehydrogenase 870 U/L [12–250], serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase 91 IU/L [10–50], and serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase 68 IU/L [10–50]) confirmed a relapse.

Figure 1: Cutaneous manifestations in a patient with relapse of dermatomyositis. (a) Fingers with periungual desquamation. (b) V-sign and areas of excoriation. (c) Malar rash indoors. (d) Malar rash not identified due to bright light

Click here to view

Teleconsultation can be a challenge in patients with chronic diseases, who may suffer from poor mobility in addition to a possibly accentuated risk of contracting COVID-19.[1] While certain distinctive rashes may be identified by the patients themselves, transformed cutaneous manifestations such as rashes in new areas or of a different phenotype may be difficult to identify. The systematic and early detection of worsening disease by the patient is fraught with confounding variables such as awareness, education level, familiarity with the usage of technology, and availability of proper lighting and conditions for useful clinical images.[2] In patients without rashes, early identification of muscle weakness would require regular assessment using remote patient-driven outcome measures.[3] While several tools such as SF-36 and PROMIS capture quality of life, their cost and language barrier may limit accessibility. Although the importance of a formal physical examination cannot be overemphasized, technological advances including the widespread use of smartphones may allow better remote monitoring than was feasible a few years ago.[2]

The author is using the abovementioned two simple tools for remote assessment, which helped with an early diagnosis of relapse in this case. Because the projected pandemic duration seems rather long at this point, it is imperative for clinicians to devise measures for quick and easy remote assessment. It is also vital to identify and educate the patients regarding the possible lacunae while sharing appropriate clinical images, such as appropriate lighting, distance, focus, and clarity.

To conclude, remote monitoring can be a challenge in chronic diseases. In the present case, timely attention to a flare was brought by the rash and confirmed by two simple patient-reported outcome measures. As patients prepare for a long haul at home during the pandemic, it is prudent to develop simple tools of remote assessment for wider usage and better patient care.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank connecting researchers and Malke Asaad for their help with this work.

Declaration of patient consent

The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given her consent for her images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that her name and initial will not be published, and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 

  References Top
1.Gupta L, Lilleker J, Agarwal V, Chinoy H, Agarwal R. COVID-19 and myositis-unique challenges. Rheumatology 2020;00:1-4.doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa610. [Accepted for publication].  Back to cited text no. 1
    2.Gupta L, Misra DP, Agarwal V, Balan S, Agarwal V. Response to: 'Telerheumatology in COVID-19 era: A study from a psoriatic arthritis cohort' by Costa et al. Ann Rheum Dis Epub ahead of print.doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217953.  Back to cited text no. 2
    3.Saygin D, Oddis CV, Moghadam-Kia S, Rockette-Wagner B, Neiman N, Koontz D, et al. Hand-held dynamometry for assessment of muscle strength in patients with inflammatory myopathies. Rheumatology2020;0:1–11. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keaa419.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
  [Figure 1]
  Top  

留言 (0)

沒有登入
gif